Skip to main content
Log in

Hybrid wheat seed production potential using the chemical hybridizing agent SC2053

  • Published:
Plant Growth Regulation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The success of hybrid wheat depends greatly on the female seed production. The objectives of this experiment were to evaluate the effects of two doses of a Chemical Hybridizing Agent (CHA) on the stigma receptivity. In a growth chamber, plants were hand emasculated or treated with a normal (D1) or an excessive dose (D2) of the CHA. Spikes were hand pollinated at different dates during the flowering period. The CHA did not affect significantly the female receptivity neither in duration nor in intensity. We pointed out that for the hybrid seed production there was an optimal period of 5 days. If pollination took place during this period, the seed set and the 1000 grain weight were the highest.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Brears T and Bingham J (1989) Exploitation of heterosis in hybrid wheat using gametocides. Vorträge für Pflanzenzüchtung 16: 397–409

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bremner PM, Eckersall RN and Scott RK (1963) The relative importance of embryo size and endosperm size in causing the effects associated with seed size in wheat. J Agr Sci 61: 139–145

    Google Scholar 

  3. Brocklehurst PA (1977) Factors controlling grain weight in wheat. Nature 266: 348–349

    Google Scholar 

  4. De Vries APh (1971) Flowering biology of wheat, particularly in view of hybrid seed production — a review. Euphytica 20: 152–170

    Google Scholar 

  5. De Marco DG (1990) Effect of seed weight, and seed phosphorus and nitrogen concentrations on the early growth of wheat seedlings. Aust J Exp Agr 30: 545–549

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dupuis I and Dumas C (1990) Biochemical markers of female receptivity in maize (Zea mays L.) assessed using in vitro fertilization. Plant Sci 70: 11–19

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gao X, Francis D, Ormrod JC and Bennett MD (1992) Changes in cell number and cell division activity during endosperm development in allohexaploid wheat, Triticum aestivum L. J Exp Bot 43: 1603–1609

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gennur MN, Hanchinal RR, Patil SJ and Goud JV (1990) Receptivity of stigma in the three species of wheat (Triticum species). Indian J Agr Sci 60: 543–544

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gonzales MV, Coque M and Herrero M (1995) Papillar integrity as an indicator of stigmatic receptivity in kiwifruit (Actinidia deliciosa). J Exp Bot 46: 263–269

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hoagland DR and Arnon DI (1938) The water culture method for growing plants without soil. Calif Agr Exp Sta Circ: 347, 39 pp

  11. Howey SJ, Spilde LA, Edwards IB and Laskar WJ (1988) Hybrid hard red spring wheat seed production potential. Agron J 80: 533–536

    Google Scholar 

  12. Imrie BC (1966) Stigma receptivity in cytoplasmic male sterile wheat. Aust J Exp Agr Ani Husb 6: 175–177

    Google Scholar 

  13. Jan CC, Qualset CO and Vogt HE (1976) Chemically induced sterility in wheat for hybrid seed production. Euphytica 25: 375–386

    Google Scholar 

  14. Khan MN, Heyne EG and Arp AL (1973) Pollen distribution and the seedset on Triticum aestivum L. Crop Sci 13: 223–226

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kherde MK, Atkins IM, Merkle OG and Porter KB (1967) Cross pollination studies with male sterile wheats of three cytoplasms, seed size on F1 plants, and seed and anther size of 45 pollinators. Crop Sci 7: 389–394

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kho YO and Bäer J (1968) Observing pollen tubes by means of fluorescence. Euphytica 17: 298–302

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ma YZ, Mackown CT and Van Sanford DA (1990) Sink manipulation in wheat: Compensatory changes in kernel size. Crop Sci 30: 1099–1105

    Google Scholar 

  18. Nepi M and Pacini E (1993) Pollination, pollen viability and pistil receptivity in Cucurbita pepo. Ann Bot 72: 527–536

    Google Scholar 

  19. Radley ME and Thorne GN (1981) Effects of decreasing the number of grains in ears of cvs Hobbit and Maris Huntsman winter wheat. Ann Appl Biol 98: 149–156

    Google Scholar 

  20. Rajki E and Rajki S (1966) Research work on hybrid wheat at Martovasar. Acta Agron Acad Sci Hung 15: 199–214

    Google Scholar 

  21. Shuraki YD and Sedgley M (1994) Effect of pistil age and pollen parent on pollen tube growth and fruit production of pistachio. J Hort Sci 69: 1019–1027

    Google Scholar 

  22. Wilson JA (1968) Problems in hybrid wheat breeding. Euphytica 17,supplement 1: 13–33

    Google Scholar 

  23. Wong M (1993) Etude de l'influence des facteurs du milieu sur les performances du Cintofen, agent chimique d'hybridation du blé d'hiver (Triticum aestivum). Ph.D. Thesis, Institut National Polytechnique de Lorraine, France, 149 pp

    Google Scholar 

  24. Wong M, Blouet A and Guckert A (1995) Effectiveness of SC 2053 as a chemical hybridizing agent for winter wheat. Plant growth Regul 16: 243–248

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Streiff, K., Blouet, A. & Guckert, A. Hybrid wheat seed production potential using the chemical hybridizing agent SC2053. Plant Growth Regulation 21, 103–108 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005716103614

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005716103614

Navigation