Abstract
The article briefly analyzes the concept of a person, arguing that personhood does not coincide with the actual enjoyment of certain intellectual capacities, but is coextensive with the embodiment of a human individual. Since in PVS patients we can observe a human individual functioning as a whole, we must conclude that these patients are still human persons, even if in a condition of extreme impairment. It is then argued that some forms of minimal treatment may not be futile for these patients; they may constitute a form of respect for their human dignity and benefit these patients, even if they are not aware of that. Moreover, it is important to consider the symbolic significance of care: while many believe that PVS is a kind of imprisonment, for others providing food and fluids is the only way to testify our proximity to these persons. The best policy would be to provide, as a general rule, artificial nutrition and hydration to PVS patients: this treatment could be withdrawn, after a period of observation and reflection by the family and proxies, on the basis of the proxies' objection to the continuation or of the patient's advance directives specifically referring to this situation.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Engelhardt Jr. HT. The Foundations of Bioethics. New York: Oxford University Press, 1986.
Tooley M. Abortion and Infanticide. New York: Oxford University Press, 1983.
Feinberg J. Potentiality, Development, and Rights. In Feinberg J., ed. The Problem of Abortion. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, 1984: 145–150.
Singer P. Practical Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979.
Mounier E. Personalism. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 1952.
Shewmon DA. Brain Death: A valid theme with invalid variations, blurred by semantic ambiguities. In: White RJ, Angstwurm H, Carrasco de Paula I, eds. The Determination of Brain Death and its Relationship to Human Death. Vatican City: Pontificia Academia Scientiarum, 1992: 23–51.
Shewmon DA, Holmes GL. Brainstem plasticity in cogenitally decerebrate children. Brain & Development 1990; 12: 664.
Poplawski N., Gillett G. Ethics and embryos. Journal of Medical Ethics 1991; 17: 62–69.
Veatch RM. The impending collapse of the whole-brain definition of death. Hastings Center Report 1993; 23 (Jul-Aug): 18–24.
Callahan D. The Troubled Dream of Life. Living with Mortality. New York: Simon & Schuster, 1993.
Dworkin R. Life's Dominion: An Argument about Abortion and Euthanasia. New York: Collins, 1993.
Capron AM. Medical futility: Strike two. Hastings Center Report 1994; 24 (Sep-Oct): 42–3.
Van McCrary S et al. Physicians' quantitative assessments of medical futility. Journal of Clinical Ethics Summer 1994; 5: 100–105.
The Appleton International Conference. Developing Guidelines for Decisions to Forgo Life-Prolonging Medical Treatment, Journal of Medical Ethics 1992; 18, Supplement.
Brody B. Special ethical issues in the management of PVS patients. Law, Medicine and Health Care 1990; 20: 109.
Bopp J. Choosing death for Nancy Cruzan. Hastings CenterReport 1990; 20 (Jan- Feb): 42–44.
Callahan D. On feeding the dying, Hastings Center Report 1983; 13 (Sep-Oct): 22.
Schneiderman LJ. Exile and PVS. Hastings Center Report 1990; 20 (May-Jun): 5.
The Hastings Center. Guidelines on the Termination of Life-Sustaining and the Care of the Dying. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1987.
Cranford RE. Termination of treatment in the PVS. Seminars in Neurology 1984; 4: 36–44.
The Multi-Society Task Force on PVS. Medical aspects of the persistent vegetative state Second Part. New England Journal of Medicine 1994 (June 2): 1572–1579.
Davis DS. Shifting the burden of proof. Second Opinion 1993; 18 (Jan): 31–36.
Cattorini P. Sotto scacco. Bioetica di fine vita. Naples: Liviana, 1993.
Emanuel LL. Appropriate and inappropriate use of advance directives. Journal of Clinical Ethics 1994; 5: 357–359.
Lynn J. Why I don't have a living will. Law, Medicine, and Health Care 1991; 19: 101–104.
Robertson JA. Second thoughts on living wills. Hastings Center Report 1991; 21 (Nov-Dec): 6–9.
American Academy of Neurology. Position of the American Academy of Neurology on certain aspects of the care and management of the PVS patient. Neurology 1989; 39: 125–126.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cattorini, P., Reichlin, M. Persistent Vegetative State: A Presumption to Treat. Theor Med Bioeth 18, 263–281 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005713511205
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005713511205