Biogeochemistry

, Volume 36, Issue 3, pp 223–237 | Cite as

Decomposition of litter produced under elevated CO2: Dependence on plant species and nutrient supply

  • VALERIE M. FRANCK
  • BRUCE A. HUNGATE
  • F. STUART CHAPINIII
  • CHRISTOPHER B. FIELD

Abstract

We investigated the effect of CO2 concentration and soilnutrient availability during growth on the subsequent decomposition andnitrogen (N) release from litter of four annual grasses that differ inresource requirements and native habitat. Vulpia microstachys isa native grass found on California serpentine soils, whereas Avenafatua, Bromus hordaceus, and Lolium multiflorum areintroduced grasses restricted to more fertile sandstone soils (Hobbs & Mooney 1991). Growth in elevated CO2 altered litter C:N ratio,decomposition, and N release, but the direction and magnitude of thechanges differed among plant species and nutrient treatments. ElevatedCO2 had relatively modest effects on C:N ratio of litter,increasing this ratio in Lolium roots (and shoots at high nutrients),but decreasing C:N ratio in Avena shoots. Growth of plants underelevated CO2 decreased the decomposition rate of Vulpialitter, but increased decomposition of Avena litter from the high-nutrient treatment. The impact of elevated CO2 on N loss fromlitter also differed among species, with Vulpia litter from high-CO2 plants releasing N more slowly than ambient-CO2litter, whereas growth under elevated CO2 caused increased Nloss from Avena litter. CO2 effects on N release in Lolium and Bromus depended on the nutrient regime in whichplants were grown. There was no overall relationship between litter C:Nratio and decomposition rate or N release across species and treatments.Based on our study and the literature, we conclude that the effects ofelevated CO2 on decomposition and N release from litter arehighly species-specific. These results do not support the hypothesis thatCO2 effects on litter quality consistently lead to decreasednutrient availability in nutrient-limited ecosystems exposed to elevatedCO2.

decomposition elevated CO2 litter quality nitrogen mineralization serpentine grassland 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Barnes JD & Pfirrmann T (1992) The influence of CO2 and O3, singly and in combination, on gas exchange, growth and nutrient status of radish (Raphanus sativus). New Phytol. 121: 403–412Google Scholar
  2. Bazzaz FA (1990) The response of natural ecosystems to the rising global CO2 levels. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 21: 167–196Google Scholar
  3. Billes G, Rouhier H & Bottner P (1990) Modifications of the carbon and nitrogen allocations in the plant (Triticum aestivumL.) soil system in response to increased atmospheric CO2 concentration. Plant Soil 157: 215–225Google Scholar
  4. Boerner REJ & Rebbeck J (1995) Decomposition and nitrogen release from leaves of three hardwood species grown under elevated O3 and/or CO2. Plant Soil 170: 149–157Google Scholar
  5. Brown KR (1991) Carbon dioxide enrichment accelerates the decline in nutrient status and relative growth rate of Populus tremuloidesMichx. seedlings. Tree Physiol. 8: 161–173Google Scholar
  6. Chu CC, Coleman JS & Mooney HA (1992) Control of biomass partitioning between roots and shoots: Atmospheric CO2 enrichment and the acquisition and allocation of carbon and nitrogen in wild radish. Oecologia 89: 580–587Google Scholar
  7. Chu CC, Field CB & Mooney HA (in press) Effects of CO2 and nutrient enrichment on tissue quality of two California annuals. OecologiaGoogle Scholar
  8. Comins HN & McMurtrie RE (1993) Long-term response of nutrient-limited forests to CO2 enrichment: equilibrium behavior of plant-soil models. Ecol. Appl. 3: 666–681Google Scholar
  9. Cotrufo MF & Ineson P (1995) Effects of enhanced atmospheric CO2 and nutrient supply on the quality and subsequent decomposition of fine roots of Betula pendulaRoth. and Picea sitchensis(Bong.) Carr. Plant Soil 170: 267–277Google Scholar
  10. Cotrufo MF, Ineson P & Rowland AP (1994) Decomposition of tree leaf litters grown under elevated CO2: Effect of litter quality. Plant Soil 163: 121–130Google Scholar
  11. Coûteaux M-M, Mousseau M, Celerier M-L & Bottner P (1991) Increased atmospheric CO2 and litter quality: Decomposition of sweet chestnut leaf litter with animal food webs of different complexities. Oikos 61: 54–64Google Scholar
  12. Curtis PS, Balduman LM, Drake BG & Whigham DF (1990) Elevated atmospheric CO2 effects on belowground processes in C3 and C4 estuarine marsh communities. Ecology 71: 2001–2006Google Scholar
  13. Diaz SA, Grime JP, Harris J & McPherson E (1993) Evidence of a feedback mechanism limiting plant response to elevated carbon dioxide. Nature 364: 616–617Google Scholar
  14. Dixon RK & Turner DP (1991) The global carbon cycle and climate change: Responses and feedbacks from below-ground systems. Environ. Pollu. 73: 245–262Google Scholar
  15. Field C, Chapin FS III, Matson PA & Mooney HA(1992) Responses of terrestrial ecosystems to the changing atmosphere: A resource-based approach. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 23: 201–235Google Scholar
  16. Field CB, Chapin FS III, Chiariello NR, Holland EA & Mooney HA (1996) The Jasper Ridge CO2 experiment: Design and motivation. In: Koch GW & Mooney HA (Eds) Carbon Dioxide and Terrestrial Ecosystems (pp 121–145). Academic Press, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
  17. Garbutt K, Williams WE & Bazzaz FA (1990) Analysis of the differential response of five annuals to elevated CO2 during growth. Ecology 71: 1185–1194Google Scholar
  18. Hickman JC (1993) The Jepson Manual, Higher Plants of California. University of California Press, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  19. Hobbie SE (in press) Temperature and plant species' control over litter decomposition in Alaskan tundra. EcologyGoogle Scholar
  20. Hobbs RJ & Mooney HA (1991) Effects of rainfall variability and gopher disturbance on serpentine annual grassland dynamics. Ecology 72: 59–68Google Scholar
  21. Huenneke LF, Hamburg SP, Koide R, Mooney HA & Vitousek PM (1990) Effects of soil resources on plant invasion and community structure in Californian serpentine grassland. Ecology 71: 478–491Google Scholar
  22. Hungate BA, Canadell JC & Chapin FS III (in press) Plant species mediate changes in microbial N in response to elevated CO2. EcologyGoogle Scholar
  23. Hungate BA, Chapin FS III, Zhong H, Holland EA & Field CB (in press) Stimulation of grassland nitrogen cycling under carbon dioxide enrichment. OecologiaGoogle Scholar
  24. Kemp PR, Waldecker DG, Owensby CE, Reynolds JF & Virginia RA(1994) Effects of elevated CO2 and nitrogen fertilization pretreatments on decomposition on tallgrass prairie leaf litter. Plant Soil 165: 115–127Google Scholar
  25. Kohen EI, Rouhier H & Mousseau M (1992) Changes in dry weight and nitrogen partitioning induced by elevated CO2 depend on soil nutrient availability in sweet chestnut (Castanea sativaMill.). Ann. Sci. For. 49: 83–90Google Scholar
  26. Lambers H (1993) Rising CO2, secondary plant metabolism, plant-herbivore interactions and litter decomposition. Vegetatio 104: 263–271Google Scholar
  27. Lindroth RL, Kinney KK & Platz CL (1993) Responses of deciduous trees to elevated atmospheric CO2: Productivity, phytochemistry and insect resistance. Ecology 74: 763–777Google Scholar
  28. Luo Y, Field CB & Mooney HA(1994) Predicting responses of photosynthesis and root fraction to elevated [CO2]: Interactions among carbon, nitrogen, and growth. Plant Cell Environ. 17: 1195–1204Google Scholar
  29. McNaughton SJ (1968) Structure and function of California grasslands. Ecology 49: 962–972Google Scholar
  30. Melillo JM, Aber JD & Muratore JF (1982) Nitrogen and lignin control of hardwood leaf litter decomposition dynamics. Ecology 63: 621–626Google Scholar
  31. Mooney HA, Drake BG, Luxmoore RJ, Oechel WC & Pitelka LF (1991) Predicting ecosystem responses to elevated CO2 concentrations. BioScience 41: 96–104Google Scholar
  32. Mooney HA, Hobbs RJ, Gorham J & Williams K (1986) Biomass accumulation and resource utilization in co-occurring grassland annuals. Oecologia 70: 555–558Google Scholar
  33. Norby RJ & O'Neill EG (1991) Leaf area compensation and nutrient interactions in CO2-enriched seedlings of yellow-poplar (Liriodendron tulipiferaL.). New Phytol. 117: 515–528Google Scholar
  34. Norby RJ, Pastor J & Melillo JM (1986) Carbon-nitrogen interactions in CO2-enriched white oak: Physiological and long term perspectives. Tree Physiology 2: 233–241Google Scholar
  35. O'Neill EG (1994) Responses of soil biota to elevated atmospheric carbon dioxide. Plant Soil 165: 55–65Google Scholar
  36. Post WM, Peng T-H, Emanuel WR, King AW, Dale VH & DeAngelis DL (1990) The global carbon cycle. Am. Sci. 78: 310–326Google Scholar
  37. Shaver GR, Billings WD, Chapin FS III, Giblin AE, Nadelhoffer KJ, Oechel WC & Rastetter EB (1992) Global change and the carbon balance of arctic ecosystems. BioScience 61: 415–435Google Scholar
  38. Taylor BR, Parkinson D & Parsons WFJ (1989) Nitrogen and lignin as predictors of litter decay rates: A microcosm test. Ecology 70: 97–104Google Scholar
  39. Turitzin SN (1982) Nutrient limitations to plant growth in a California serpentine grassland. Am. Midl. Nat. 107: 95–99Google Scholar
  40. Vitousek PM & Howarth RW (1991) Nitrogen limitation on land and in the sea: How can it occur? Biogeochemistry 13: 87–115Google Scholar
  41. Winer BJ, Brown DR & Michels KM (1991) Statistical Principles in Experimental Design. McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York, New York, USAGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • VALERIE M. FRANCK
    • 1
  • BRUCE A. HUNGATE
    • 1
  • F. STUART CHAPINIII
    • 1
  • CHRISTOPHER B. FIELD
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Integrative BiologyUniversity of CaliforniaBerkeleyUSA
  2. 2.Smithsonian Environmental Research CenterEdgewaterUSA
  3. 3.Carnegie Institution of WashingtonStanfordUSA

Personalised recommendations