Skip to main content
Log in

Field Comparison of two NO2 Passive Samplers to Assess Spatial Variation

  • Published:
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Two-week average NO2 concentrations were measured in Amsterdam (NL), Huddersfield (UK) and Prague (CZ) at 80 sites in each study area, to assess small area spatial variation, using a tube type and a badge type passive sampler. The badges appeared to be less robust than the tubes. The lower detection limit for tubes and badges was 3.7 and 0.91 µg/m3, respectively for fortnightly measurements. Accuracy of the samplers was determined with reference methods (chemiluminescence). The mean ratio of the concentration measured by diffusion tube over that by the reference method was 1.16, 1.03 and 0.77 in Amsterdam, Huddersfield and Prague, respectively. Standardizing the badges for the results obtained in Amsterdam, the relative mean ratio of the concentration measured by the badges over that by the reference method was 0.95 and 0.58 in Huddersfield and Prague, respectively. NO2 concentrations measured by the two designs did not differ significantly. Mean NO2 concentrations were 36, 26 and 22 µg/m3 in Amsterdam, Huddersfield and Prague, respectively. The precision of duplicate tubes and badges was 8% and 11%, respectively. Both samplers are suitable for determining real variation in small area NO2 concentrations in the ranges which occurred. It is concluded that low-cost, simple NO2 passive samplers can provide reliable information about variation in NO2 concentrations within urban or rural areas on a small spatial scale. Based on its robustness and its precision, tubes were preferred over badges.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Atkins, D. H. F, Sandalls, J., Law, D. V., Hough, A. M. and Stevenson, K.: 1986, ‘The Measurement of Nitrogen Dioxide in the Outdoor Environment Using Passive Diffusion Tube Samplers AERE R12133’, Environmental and Medical Sciences Division, Harwell Laboratory, Oxfordshire.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkins, D. H. F. and Lee, D. S.: 1995, ‘Spatial and temporal variation of rural nitrogen dioxide concentrations across the United Kingdom’, Atmospheric Environment 29, 223–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boleij, J. S. M., Lebret, E., Hoek, F., Noij, D. and Brunekreef, B.: 1986, ‘The use of Palmes diffusion tubes for measuring NO2 in homes'. Atmospheric Environment 20, 597–600.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bower, J. S., Lampert, J. E., Stevenson, K. J., Atkins, D. H. F. and Law, D. V.: 1991, ‘A diffusion tube survey of NO2 levels in urban areas of the UK’, Atmospheric Environment 25, 255–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, G.W.: 1988, ‘Measurements of nitrogen dioxide concentrations at rural sites in the United Kingdom using diffusion tubes’, Envir. Poll. 55, 251–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, G.W., Stedman, J.R. and Stevenson, K.: 1994, ‘A survey of nitrogen dioxide concentrations in the United Kingdom using diffusion tubes, July-December 1991’, Atmospheric Environment 28, 477–486.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, P., Briggs, D. J., Lebret, E., Gory\(\tilde s\)ki, P. and Kriz, B.: 1996, ‘Small area variations in air quality and health (the SAVIAH study): design and methods’ (in prep.).

  • Fischer, P. et al.: 1989, ‘Effects of indoor exposure to nitrogen dioxide on pulmonary function of women living in urban and rural areas’, Envir. Int. 15, 375–381.

    Google Scholar 

  • Girman, J. R., Hodgson, A. T., Robison, B. K. and Traynor, G. W.: 1983, ‘Laboratory studies of the temperature dependence of the Palmes NO2 passive sampler Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory’, University of California, Berkeley. Presented at the EPA National Symposium on recent advances in pollutant monitoring of ambient air and stationary sources, Raleigh, NC, May 3–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldsmith, A.: 1986, ‘Measurements of Nitrogen Dioxide at Rural Sites Using Diffusion Samplers’, Warren Spring Laboratory Report no LR 582 (AP)M.

  • Hewitt, C. N.: 1991, ‘Spatial variations in nitrogen dioxide concentrations in an urban area'. Atmospheric Environment 25, 429–434.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoek, G., Brunekreef, B., Meijer, R., Scholten, A. and Boleij, J. S. M.: 1984a, ‘Indoor nitrogen dioxide pollution and respiratory symptoms of schoolchildren’, Int. Arch. Occup. Envir. Health 55, 79–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoek, G., Meijer, R., Scholten, A., Noij, D. and Lebret, E.: 1984b, ‘The relationship between indoor nitrogen dioxide concentration levels and personal exposure: A pilot study’, Int. Arch. Occup. Envir. Health 55, 73–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krochmal, D. and Góki, L.: 1991, ‘Determination of nitrogen dioxide in ambient air by use of a passive sampling technique and triethanolamine as absorbent’, Envir. Sci. Technol. 25, 531–535.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laxen, D. P. H. and Noordally, E.: 1987, ‘Nitrogen dioxide distribution in street canyons’, Atmospheric Environment 21, 1899–1903.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lebret, E., Briggs, D. J., Collins, S., van Reeuwijk, H., Fischer, P. H., Harssema, H., Kriz, B., Gory\(\tilde s\)ki, P. and Elliott, P.: 1996, ‘Small area variations in Ambient NO2 exposures in four European areas’ (in prep.).

  • Noij, D., Lebret, E., Willers, H., Winkes, A., Boleij, J. S. M. and Brunekreef, B.: 1986, ‘Estimating human exposure to nitrogen dioxide: results froma personal monitoring study among housewives’, Envir. Int. 12, 407–411.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mücke, H. G., Manns, H., Turowski, E. and Nitz, G.: 1995, ‘European intercomparison workshops on air quality monitoring - Measuring of SO2, NO and NO2 - Vol. 1. European intercomparison workshops on air quality monitoring - Measuring of SO2, NO and NO2 - Vol. 1'. Berlin. WHO Collaborating Centre for Air Quality Management and Air Pollution Control, Report 7.

  • Palmes, E. D., Gunnison, A. F., DiMattio, J. and Tomczyk, C.: 1976, ‘Personal sampler for nitrogen dioxide’, Am. Ind. Hyg. Assoc. J. 37, 570–577.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Quackenboss, J. J., Spengler, J.D., Kanarek, M. S., Letz, R. and Duffy, C. P.: 1986, ‘Personal exposure to nitrogen dioxide: Relationship to indoor/outdoor air quality and activity patterns’, Envir. Sci. Technol. 20, 775–782.

    Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute Inc.: 1990, SAS® Procedures Guide, Version 6, Third Edition, p. 628; Cary, NC, USA.

  • Scheeren, B. A., Santis, F. de, Allegrini, I. and Heeres, P.: 1994, ‘Monitoring SO2 with passive samplers: a laboratory evaluation of Na2CO3 and triethanolamine as absorbing media’, Intern. J. Envir. Anal. Chem. 56, 73–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spengler, J. D., Duffy, C. P., Letz, R., Tibbitts, T. W. and Ferris, B. G. J. R.: 1983, ‘Nitrogen dioxide inside and outside 137 homes and implications for ambient air quality standards and health effects research’, Envir. Sci. Technol. 17, 164–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willems, J. J. H. and Hofschreuder, P.: 1991, ‘A Passive Monitor for Measuring Ammonia’, in Field Intercomparison Exercise on Ammonia and Ammonium Measurements. Air pollution research report 37. CNR, Commission of the European Communities.

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

van Reeuwijk, H., Fischer, P.H., Harssema, H. et al. Field Comparison of two NO2 Passive Samplers to Assess Spatial Variation. Environ Monit Assess 50, 37–51 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005703722232

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005703722232

Navigation