Skip to main content
Log in

Science-Technology Linkages in an Emerging Research Platform: The Case of Combinatorial Chemistry and Biology

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article focuses on issues concerning science and technology relationships posed by the emergence of a new drug discovery method, namely, combinatorial chemistry and biology. We assess the scientific content of combinatorial chemistry and biology using citations in patents to scientific journals and compare this research platform with biotechnology. We also identify the institutional affiliation of all the authors of the cited papers, which leads us to an analysis of knowledge spillovers between the main participants in the research network. Finally, we examine the relevance of localisation in the process of knowledge exchange with regard to EU countries and the US. The result of the analysis provides evidence to support the view that the inventive capacity of a country is dependent upon the basic research which is carried out, especially in universities and public research centres located in the inventor's country.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, J., N. Williams, F. Seemungal, F. Narin, D. Olivastro (1996), Human genetic technology: exploring the links between science and innovation, Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 8: 135-156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arundel, A., G. Van De Pall, L. Soete (1995), Innovation Strategies of Europe's Largest Industrial Firms. PACE Report prepared for the SPRINT Programme of the European Commission.

  • Borchardt, J. (1998), Combinatorial chemistry: Not just for pharmaceuticals, Today's Chemist at Work, 7: 34-35, 37, 39, 41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borman, S. (1997), Combinatorial chemistry, Chemical & Engineering News, February 24, pp. 43-62.

  • Borman, S. (1997), Combinatorial chemistry, Chemical & Engineering News, April 8, pp. 1-24. http:/pubs.acs.org/hotarcl/cenear/980406/comb.html

  • Brown, K. S. (1996), Drug, biotech firms beginning to embrace combinatorial chemistry, The Scientist, 10: 1, 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunin, B. A., J. A. Ellman (1992), A general and expedient method for the solid-phase synthesis of 1,4-benzodiazepine derivatives, Journal of the American Chemical Society, 114, 10997-10998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, P., M. Cooper, F. Narin (1980), Linkage between research literature and patents, Research Management, March, pp. 30-35.

  • Collins, P., S. Wyatt (1988), Citations in patents to the basic research literature, Research Policy, 17: 65-74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Damms, B., W. Bains (1995), The cost of delivering drugs without needles, Bio/Technology, 13: 1438-1440.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deprez, B., X. Williard, L. Bourel, H. Coste, F. Hyafil, A. Tartar (1995), Orthogonal combinatorial chemical libraries, Journal of the American Chemical Society, 117: 5404-5406.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Witt, S.H., A. W. Czarnik (1995), Combinatorial organic synthesis using Parke-Davies's DIVERSOMER method, Association of Chemical Research, 29: 114-122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ecker, D., S. Crooke (1995), Combinatorial drug discovery: Which methods will produce the greatest value? Bio/Technology, 13: 351-359.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fodor, S. P. A., J. Read, M. C. Pirrung, L. Stryer, A. T. Lu, D. Solas (1991), Light directed, spatially addressable parallel chemical synthesis, Science, 251: 767

    Google Scholar 

  • Furka, Á. (1995), The history of combinatoríal chemistry, Drug Development Research, 36: 1-12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furka, Á, F. SebestyÉn, M. Asgedom, G. DibÓ (1991), General method for rapid synthesis of multicomponent peptide mixtures, International Journal of Protein Research, 37: 487-493.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallop, M., R. Barrett, W. Dower, S. Fodor, E. Gordon (1994), Applications of combinatorial technologies to drug discovery. 1. Background and peptide combinatorial libraries, Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 37: 1233-1251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geysen, H. M., R. H. Meloen, S. J. Barteling (1984), Use of peptide synthesis to probe viral antigens for epitobes to a resolution of a single amino acid, Proceedings in National Academy of Science USA, 81: 3998-4002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geuna, A. (1999), Contribution to innovation and the evolution of scientific specialisation in the chemical and pharmaceutical industries, Paper presented at the European Meeting on Applied Evolutionary Economics, Grenoble 7–9 June.

  • Glaser, V. (1995), Drug companies like combinatorial chemistry, Bio/Technology, 13: 311-312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godin, B. (1995), Research and the practice of publication in industries. Research Policy, 25: 587-606.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, E., M. Gallop, D. Patel (1996), Strategy and tactics in combinatorial organic synthesis. Applications to drug discovery, Account Chemical Research, 2: 144-154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grupp, H., U. Schmoch (1992), Perceptions of scientification of innovation as measure by referencing between patents and papers: Dynamics in science-based field of technology, In: Dynamics of Science-based Innovation, H. Grupp (Ed.), Springer-Verlag.

  • Grupp, H., G. MÜnt, U. Schmoch (1995), Wissensintensive Wirtschaft und ressourcen-schonende Technik. Report to the German Ministry of Education and Research. Karlsruhe.

  • Houghten, R. A. (1985), General method for the rapid solid-phase synthesis of large number of peptides: Specificity of antigen-antibody interaction at the level of individual amino-acids, Proceedings in National Academy of Science USA, 82: 5131-5135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaffe, A. (1989), Real effects of academic research, American Economic Review, 79: 957-970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaffe, A., M. Trajenberg, R. Henderson (1993), Geographic localisation of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 63: 577-598.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klevorick, A., R. Levin, R. Nelson, S. Winter (1996), On the sources and significance of interindustry differences in technological opportunities, Research Policy, 24: 185-205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lebl, M. (1999), Parallel personal comments on ‘classical’ papers in combinatorial chemistry, Journal of Combinatorial Chemistry, 1: 3-24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowe, G. (1995), Combinatorial chemistry, Chemical Society Review, 29: 309-382.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahadi, S., K. Pavitt (1997), Key national factors in the emergence of computational chemistry firms, International Journal of Innovation Management, 1: 355-386.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, B. et al. (1996), The Relationship Between Publicly Funded Basic Research and Economic Performance. Brighton: SPRU, University of Sussex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Narin, F., D. Olivastro (1998), Linkage between patents and papers: An interim EPO/US comparison, Scientometrics, 41: 51-59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Narin, F., D. Olivastro (1992), Status report: Linkage between technology and science, Research Policy, 21: 237-249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Narin F., K. S. Hamilton, D. Olivastro (1997), The increasing linkage between US technology and public science, Research Policy, 26: 317-330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orsenigo, L. (1989), The Emergence of Biotechnology: Institutions and Markets in Industrial Innovation. London: Pinter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plunkett, M. J., J. A. Ellman (1997), Combinatorial chemistry and new drugs, Scientific American, April, pp. 54-59.

  • Rosenberg, N. (1990), Why do firms do basic research with their own money? Research Policy, 19: 169-175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmoch, U. et al. (1993), Indicators of the Scientific Base of European Patents, Luxenbourg: Office for Official Publications of the EC, EUR-15330-EN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmoch, U. (1997), Indicators and relations between science and technology, Scientometrics, 38: 103-116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Service, R. (1998), Winning combination, Research Policy Technology Review, May/June, pp. 34-41.

  • Smith, B. L. R., C. E. Barfield (1996), Contributions of research and technological advance. In: Technology, R&D, and the Economy, B. L. R. Smith, C. E. Barfield (Eds), Washington, D.C.: The Brookings Institution and American Enterprise Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, G. P. (1985), Filamentous fusion phage: Novel expression vectors that display cloned antigens on the virion surface, Science, 228: 1315-1317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terrett, N., M. Gardner, D. Gordon, R. Kobylecki, J. Steele (1995), Combinatorial synthesis — The design of compound libraries and their application to drug discovery, Tetrahedron, 51: 8135-8173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomke, S., E. Von Hippel, R. Franke (1998), Modes of experimentation: An innovation process and competitive variable, Research Policy, 27: 315-332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Vianen, B. G., H. F. Moed, A. F. J. Van Raan (1990), An exploration of the science base of recent technology, Research Policy, 19: 61-81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verspagen, B. (1999), Large firms and knowledge flows in the Dutch R&D system, A case study of Philips Electronics, Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 11: 211-233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells, W. (1999), Combinatorial Chemistry, Making More Drugs. http://outcast.gene.come/ae/AB/BA/combiChem/

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Malo, S., Geuna, A. Science-Technology Linkages in an Emerging Research Platform: The Case of Combinatorial Chemistry and Biology. Scientometrics 47, 303–321 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005643127551

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005643127551

Keywords

Navigation