Abstract
This essay attempts to develop a psychologically informed semantics of perception reports, whose predictions match with the linguistic data. As suggested by the quotation from Miller and Johnson-Laird, we take a hallmark of perception to be its fallible nature; the resulting semantics thus necessarily differs from situation semantics. On the psychological side, our main inspiration is Marr's (1982) theory of vision, which can easily accomodate fallible perception. In Marr's theory, vision is a multi-layered process. The different layers have filters of different gradation, which makes vision at each of them approximate. On the logical side, our task is therefore twofold
- to formalise the layers and the ways in which they may refine each other, and
- to develop logical means to let description vary with such degrees of refinement.
The first task is formalised by means of an inverse systems of first order models, with reality appearing as its inverse limit. The second task is formalised by means of so-called conditional quantifiers, a new form of generalised quantification which can best be described as resource bounded quantification. We show that the logic provides for a semantics and pragmatics of direct perception reports. In particular, direct perception reports have a possibly nonveridical, approximative semantics, which becomes veridical only by virtue of our pragmatic expectation that what is perceived would continue to be the case, were we to perceive more accurately.
It is a general feature of resource bounded logics that the underlying logics are weak, but that stronger principles can be obtained pragmatically, by strengthening the resource. For the logic of vision this feature is clarified by showing how changes in the resource capture different notions of partiality, and by studying how the perception verb interacts with connectives and quantifiers in different visual contexts. The inference Veridicality, which is now viewed rather as a nonmonotonic inference, is also studied in depth.
We end with an attempt to buttress the proposed model by comparing it with suggestions put forward in Cognitive or Conceptual Semantics, in the literature on evidentials, and in Husserl's philosophy of perception.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Akmajian, A.: 1977, ‘The Complement Structure of Perception Verbs in an Autonomous Syntax Framework’ in Culicover et al. (eds.), Formal Syntax, Academic Press, New York, 427-460.
Anderson, L. B.: 1986, ‘Evidentials, Paths of Change, and Mental Maps: Typologically Regular Asymmetries’ in W. Chafe and J. Nichols (eds.), Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology, Advances in Discourse Processes. Vol. XX, Chap. 17, Ablex Publishing Corporation, Norwood, New Jersey, 273-312.
Anscombe, G. E. M.: 1981, The Intensionality of Sensation: A Grammatical Feature, Basil Blackwell, Oxford. This chapter published in 1965.
Aoki, H. 1986: ‘Evidentials in Japanese’ in W. Chafe and J. Nichols (eds.), Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology, Advances in Discourse Processes, Vol. XX, Chap. 14, Ablex Publishing Corporation, Norwood, New Jersey.
Asher, N. and D. Bonevac: 1989, ‘Determiners and Resource Situations’ Linguistics and Philosophy 10, 567-596.
Ayer, A. J.: 1971, Language, Truth and Logic, Pelican Books. Harmondsworth, Middlesex, England: Penguin Books. First published: 1936, second edition: 1946, fifth Penguin reprint: 1978.
Barnes, J.: 1984, ‘Evidentials in the Tuyuca Verb’ International Journal of American Linguistics 50(3), 255-271.
Barwise, J.: 1981, ‘Scenes and Other Situations’ Journal of Philosophy LXXVIII, 369-397.
Barwise, J.: 1989, ‘Logic and Information’ in The Situation in Logic, Lecture Notes. Vol. 17. CSLI Publications, Stanford, California. Distributed by Cambridge University Press.
Barwise, J. and J. Perry: 1983, Situations and Attitudes, The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Biederman, I.: 1987, ‘Recognition-by-Components: A Theory of Human Image Understanding’ Psychological Review 94(a), 115-147.
Boden, M. A.: 1988, Computer Models of Mind, Problems in Behavioural Sciences. Vol. 4, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Cairns, D.: 1973, Guide for Translating Husserl, Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague.
Chafe, W. and J. Nichols: 1986, Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology, Advances in Discourse Processes, Vol. XX, Ablex Publishing Corporation, Norwood, New Jersey.
Engelking, R.: 1989, General Topology, Sigma Series in Pure Mathematics, Vol. 6, Heldermann, Berlin. Revised and completed edition.
Gärdenfors, P.: 1997a, ‘Meanings as Conceptual Structures’ in M. Carrier and P. Machamer (eds.), Mindscapes: Philosophy, Science, and the Mind, Pittsburgh University Press, Pittsburgh, pp. 61-86.
Gärdenfors, P.: 1997b, ‘Symbolic, Conceptual and Subconceptual Representations’ in V. Cantoni, V. di Ges, A. Setti, and D. Tegolo (eds.), Human and Machine Perception: Information Fusion, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 255-270.
Gee, J.: 1977, ‘Comments on the Paper by Akmajian’ in Culicover et al. (eds.), Formal Syntax, Academic Press, New York, pp. 461-481.
Graetzer, C.: 1971, Universal Algebra, 2nd edition, Springer-Verlag, New York.
Grice, H. P.: 1961, ‘The Causal Theory of Perception’ Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 35(suppl.): 121-152. Revised version published as chapter 15 in Grice 1989.
Grice, H. P.: 1989, Studies in the Ways of Words, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Halmos, P. R.: 1952, ‘Algebraic Logic, I: Monadic Boolean Algebras’ Compositio Mathematica 12, 217-249.
Hendriks, H.: 1993, Studied Flexibility. Categories and Types in Syntax and Semantics, Doctoral dissertation, ILLC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam. ILLC Dissertation Series 1993-5.
Higginbotham, J.: 1983, ‘The Logic of Perceptual Reports: An Extensional Alternative to Situation Semantics’ Journal of Philosophy LXXX, 100-127.
Hintikka, K. J. J.: 1969, ‘On the Logic of Perception’ in Models for Modalities, Synthese Library, Vol. 23, D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht.
Holzapfel, A.: 1997, Zur Evidentialität Im Japanischen. Research report. Eberhard-Karls-Universität Tübingen: Seminar für Sprachwissenschaft.
Hone, K.: 1993, A Cross-Linguistic Study of Perception and Cognition; Verb Complements: A Cognitive Perspective, Doctoral dissertation, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, August.
Horn, L.: 1989, A Natural History of Negation, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Husserl, E.: 1950, Ideen zu einer reinen Phänomenologie und phänomenologisehe Philosophie, Husserliana, Vol. Band I. Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague.
Husserl, E.: 1966, Analysen zur passiven Synthesis, Husserliana, Band XI. Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague.
Husserl, E.: 1972, Erfahrung und Urteil, Philosophische Bibliothek, Band 280, Felix Meiner, Hamburg.
Husserl, F.: 1977, Cartesianische Meditationen, Philosophische Bibliothek, Band 291, Felix Meiner, Hamburg.
Jackendoff, R.: 1983, Semantics and Cognition, MIT Press.
Jackendoff, R.: 1987, Consciousness and the Computational Mind, MIT Press.
Jackendoff, R.: 1990, Semantic Structures, MIT Press.
Koons, R. C.: 1996, ‘Information, Representation and the Possibility of Error’ in J. Seligman and D. Westerståhl (eds.), Logic, Language, and Computation, Chap. 22, Lecture Notes, CSLI Publications, Stanford, 333-345.
Lakoff, G. (ed.): 1987, Women, Fire and Dangerous Things, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Landau, B. and R. Jackendoff: 1993, ‘“What” and “Where” in Language and Spatial Cognition’ Behavioral and Brian Sciences 16, 217-265.
Landau, B., L. Smith and S. Jones: 1988, ‘The Importance of Shape in Early Lexical Learning’ Cognitive Development 3, 299-321.
Landnian, F.: 1986, Towards a Theory of Information, Doctoral dissertation, Department of Philosophy, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam. Also published with Foris.
Lewis, D.: 1972, ‘General Semantics’ in D. Davidson and G. Harman (eds.), Semantics of Natural Language, D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, 169-218.
Marr, D.: 1982, Vision: A Computational Investigation into the Human Representation and Processing of Visual Information, W. H. Freeman, San Fransisco.
Miller, G. A. and P. N. Johnson-Laird: 1976, Language and Perception, Harvard University Press, Harvard.
Mittwoch, A.: 1990, ‘On the Distribution of Bare Infinitive Complements in English’ Journal of Linguistics 26, 103-131.
Muskens, R.: 1989, Meaning and Partiality, Doctoral dissertation, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam.
Neale, S.: 1992, ‘Paul Grice and the Philosophy of Language’ Linguistics and Philosophy 15, 509-559. Review article of Grice 1989.
O'Connor, M. C.: 1987, Topic in Northern Pomo Grammar, Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, March.
Reiter, R.: 1980, ‘A Logic for Default Reasoning’ Artificial Intelligence 13, 81-132.
Thomason, S. K.: 1989, ‘Free Construction of Time from Events’ Journal of Philosophical Logic 18, 43-67.
Thurgood, G.: 1986, ‘The Nature and Origin of the Akha Evidentails System’ in W. Chafe and J. Nichols (eds.), Evidentiality: The Liguistic Coding of Epistemology, Advances in Discourse Processes, Vol. XX, Chap. 13, Norwood, New Jersey: Ablex Publishing Corporation, 214-222.
Van der Does, J.: 1991, ‘A Generalized Quantifier Logic for Naked Infinitives’ Linguistics and Philosophy 14, 241-294.
Van Lambalgen, M.: 1999, Conditional Quantification, or Poor Man's Probability, Technical report. Submitted.
Van Lambalgen, M. and J. van der Does: t.a., ‘A Logic of Vision: Preliminaries’ in G. R. Renardel de Lavalette and C. Condaravdi (eds.), Proceedings of the Stanford LLC-workshop (prov. title), Lecture Notes, Stanford, California: CSLI Publications.
Verkuyl, H.: 1993, A Theory of Aspectuality. The interaction between Temporal and Atemporal Structure. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Viberg, Å.: 1984, The Verbs of Perception: A Typological Study’ in Butterworth, Comrie and Dahl (eds.), Explanations for Language Universals, Mouton De Gruyter, Berlin.
Voorbraak, F.: 1997, A Nonmonotonic Observation Logic, research report LP-97-09. ILLC, University of Amsterdam.
Willett, T.: 1988, ‘A Cross-Linguistic Survey of the Grammaticization of Evidentiality’ Studies in Language 12(1), 51-97.
Wright, F. B.: 1962, ‘Convergence of Quantifiers and Martingales’ Pacific Journal of Mathematics 6, 296-307.
Zwarts, J.: 1995, ‘The Semantics of Relative Position’ in Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory, SALT 5, Cornell University. A revised version to appear in Journal of Semantics.
Zwarts, J. and Y. Winter: 1997, A Semantic Characterization of Locative PPs. Manuscript, OTS, Utrecht.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
van der Does, J.M., van Lambalgen, M. A Logic of Vision. Linguistics and Philosophy 23, 1–92 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005584121495
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005584121495