Journal of Chemical Ecology

, Volume 26, Issue 8, pp 1991–2005 | Cite as

Role of Toxins in Intake of Varied Diets by Sheep

  • E. A. Burritt
  • F. D. Provenza


Herbivores foraging on toxic plants may consume a variety of foods that contain different toxins to increase food intake and to avoid toxicosis. We studied whether lambs offered two foods, each containing a different toxin, could ingest more food than lambs offered one food with a single toxin. Thirty-two lambs were allotted to four groups that received: (1) a ration with toxin A, (2) a ration with toxin B, (3) two rations, one with toxin A and the other with toxin B, and (4) a ration with no toxins. Toxin pairs used in the study were (1) amygdalin and lithium chloride (LiCl), (2) LiCl and LiCl, (3) sparteine and saponin, (4) oxalate and nitrate, and (5) tannin and saponin. For an hour each morning, lambs were offered their ration(s) and intakes were measured. Lambs were maintained on an alfalfa pellet or grass hay diet. Each trial lasted either five or six days. Whether or not lambs ate more when offered foods with different toxins depended on the kind and amount of toxin in the food. Lambs offered rations with amygdalin and LiCl or oxalate and nitrate consumed more food than lambs offered a ration with only one of these toxins. Lambs offered rations with sparteine and saponin or tannin and saponin did not eat more food than lambs offered a ration with either saponin or sparteine or tannin alone. Nor did lambs eat more when offered two rations both containing LiCl. In all trials, lambs offered toxins showed no signs of toxicosis, and they ate less food than lambs offered rations without toxins. Our results indicate that in some cases ruminants can increase intake of toxic foods by consuming foods containing different toxins. However, currently the only way to determine how specific toxins may interact in the body to influence intake would be to conduct feeding trials using plants or ground diets that contain toxins.

Toxins secondary compounds intake sheep lithium chloride amygdalin saponin sparteine oxalate nitrate tannin toxins 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Aharoni, Y., Gilboa, N., Nitsan, Z., and Perevolotsky, A. 1998. Analysis of the suppressive effect of tannins on ruminal degradation by compartmental models. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 71:251–267.Google Scholar
  2. Aminlari, M., and Gilanpour, H. 1991. Comparative studies on the distribution of rhodanese in different tissues of domestic mammals. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 99B:673–677.Google Scholar
  3. Atwood, S. B., Provenza, F. D., Wiedmeier, R. D., and Banner, R. E. 2000. Behavioral and economic effects of feeding free-choice and total-mixed rations on fattening cattle. J. Anim. Sci. Submitted.Google Scholar
  4. Banner, R. E., Rogesic, J., Provenza, F. D., and Burritt, E. A. 2000. Supplementation of barley and charcoal increase intake of sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata) by lambs. J. Range Manage. In press.Google Scholar
  5. Burritt, E. A., and Provenza, F. D. 1989. Food aversion learning: Ability of lambs to distinguish safe from harmful foods. J. Anim. Sci. 67:1732–1739.Google Scholar
  6. Cheeke, P. 1998. Natural Toxicants in Feeds, Forages and Poisonous Plants. Interstate Publ., Danville, Illinois.Google Scholar
  7. Clapperton, K., Matthews, L. R., Fawkes, M. S., and Pearson, A. J. 1996. Lithium and cyanideinduced conditioned food aversions in brushtail possums. J. Wildl. Manage. 60:195–201.Google Scholar
  8. Duncan, A. J., and Milne, J. A. 1992. Effect of long-term intra-ruminal infusion of the glucosinate metabolite allyl cyanide on the voluntary food intake and metabolism of lambs. J. Sci. Food Agric. 58:9–14.Google Scholar
  9. Duncan, A. J., Frutos, P., and Young, S. A. 2000. The effect of rumen adaptation to oxalic acid on selection of oxalic acid-rich plants by goats. Submitted.Google Scholar
  10. DUToit, J. T., Provenza, F. D., and Nastis, A. S. 1991. Conditioned taste aversions: How sick must a ruminant get before it detects toxicity in foods? Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 30:35–46.Google Scholar
  11. Early, D. M., and Provenza, F. D. 1998. Food flavor and nutritional characteristics alter dynamics of food preference in lambs. J. Anim. Sci. 76:728–734.Google Scholar
  12. Foley, W. J., McLean, S., and Cork, S. J. 1995. Consequences of biotransformation of plant secondary metabolites on acid-base metabolism in mammals-a final common pathway? J. Chem. Ecol. 21:721–743.Google Scholar
  13. Foley, W. J., Iason, G. R., and Mcarthur, C. 1999. Role of plant secondary metabolites in the nutritional ecology of mammalian herbivores—how far have we come in 25 years. 5th International Symposium on the Nutrition of Herbivores, pp. 130–209, in H. G. Jung and G. C. Fahey (eds.).Nutritional Ecology of Herbivores, American Society of Animal Science, Sovoy, IL.Google Scholar
  14. Freeland, W. J., and Janzen, D. H. 1974. Strategies in herbivory by mammals: The role of plant secondary compounds. Am. Nat. 108:269–288.Google Scholar
  15. Freeland, W. J., Calcott, P. H., and Anderson, L. R. 1985. Tannins and saponins: Interaction in herbivore diets. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 13:189–193.Google Scholar
  16. Gee, J. M., Price, K. R., Rideout, C. L., Wortley, G. M., Hurrell, R. F., and JOHNSON, I. T. 1993. Saponins of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa): Effects processing on their abundance in quinoa products and the biological effects on intestinal mucosal tissue. J. Sci. Food Agric. 63:201–209.Google Scholar
  17. Harrison, F. A., Hill, K. J., and Mangan, J. L. 1963: Absorption and excretion of lithium and magnesium in the sheep. Biochem. J. 89:99p-100p.Google Scholar
  18. Hubbard, C. L. 1995. Responses of sheep to variation in endopyte infection of Festuca rubra. MS thesis. York University, Toronto, Canada.Google Scholar
  19. Illius, A. W., and Jessop, N. S. 1995. Modeling metabolic costs of allelochemical ingestion by foraging herbivores. J. Chem. Ecol. 21:693–719.Google Scholar
  20. Johnson, J. H., Crookshank, H. R., and Smalley, H. E. 1980. Lithium toxicity in cattle. Vet. Hum. Toxicol. 22:248–251.Google Scholar
  21. KRONBERG, S. L., MUNTIFERING, E. L., AYERS, E. L., and MARLOW, C. B. 1993. Cattle avoidance of leafy spurge: A case of conditioned aversion. J. Range. Manage. 46:364–366.Google Scholar
  22. KUMAR, R., and SINGH, M. 1984. Tannins, their adverse role in ruminant nutrition. J. Agric. Food Chem. 32:447–453.Google Scholar
  23. Kumar, R., and Vaithiyanathan, S. 1990. Occurrence, nutritional significance and effect on animal productivity of tannins in tree leaves. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 30:21–38.Google Scholar
  24. Kyriazakis, I., Anderson, D. H., and Duncan, A. J. 1998. Conditioned flavour aversions in sheep: the relationship between the dose rate of a secondary plant compound and the acquisition and persistence of aversions. Br. J. Nutr. 79:55–62.Google Scholar
  25. Launchbaugh, K. L., Burritt, E. A., and Provenza, F. D. 1993. How herbivores track variable environments: Response to variability to phytotoxins. J. Chem. Ecol. 19:1047–1056.Google Scholar
  26. Makkar, H. P. S., Blummel, M., and Becker, K. 1995. Formation of complexes between polyvinyl pyrrolidones or polyethylene glycols and tannins, and their implications in gas production and true digestibility in in vitro techniques. Br. J. Nutr. 73:897–913.Google Scholar
  27. Mcarthur, C., Hagerman, A. E., and Robbins, C. T. 1991. Physiological strategies of mammalian herbivores against plant defenses. pp. 103–114. In R. T. Palo and C. T. Robbins (eds.). Plant Defenses Against Mammalian Herbivory. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida. NRC. 1985. Nutrient Requirements of Sheep. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  28. Olson, J. D., and Ralphs, M. H. 1986. Feed aversions induced by intraruminal infusion with larkspur extract in cattle. Am. J. Vet. Res. 47:1829–1833.Google Scholar
  29. Osweiler, G. D., Carson, T. L., Buck, W. B., and Van Gelder, G. A. 1985. Clinical and diagnostic veterinary toxicology, 3rd ed. Kendall/Hunt, Dubuque, Iowa.Google Scholar
  30. Pfister, J. A., Provenza, F. D., and Manners, G. D. 1990. Ingestion of tall larkspur by cattle: Separating the effects of flavor from post-ingestive consequences. J. Chem. Ecol. 16:1697–1705.Google Scholar
  31. Pfister, J. A., Provenza, F. D., Manners, G. D., Gardner, D. R., and Ralphs, M. H. 1997. Tall larkspur ingestion: Can cattle regulate intake below toxic levels? J. Chem. Ecol. 23:759–777.Google Scholar
  32. Poage, G. W., Scott, C. B., Bisson, M. G., and Hartmann, S. 2000.Activated charcoal attenuates bitterweed toxicosis in sheep. J. Range Manage. 53:73–78.Google Scholar
  33. Provenza, F. D. 1995. Postingestive feedback as an elementary determinant of food preference and intake in ruminants. J. Range Manage. 48:2–17.Google Scholar
  34. Provenza, F. D. 1996. Acquired aversions as the basis for varied diets of ruminants foraging on rangelands. J. Anim. Sci. 74:2010–2020.Google Scholar
  35. Provenza, F. D., Burritt, E. A., Clausen, T. P., Bryant, J. P., Reichardt, P. B., and Distel, R. A. 1990. Conditioned flavor aversion: A mechanism for goats to avoid condensed tannins in blackbrush. Am. Nat. 136:810–828.Google Scholar
  36. PROVENZA, F. D., ORTEGA-REYES, L., SCOTT, C. B., LYNCH, J. J., and BURRITT, E. A. 1994a. Anti-emetic drugs attenuate food aversions in sheep. J. Anim. Sci. J. Anim. Sci. 72:1989–1994.Google Scholar
  37. Provenza, F. D., Lynch, J. J., Burritt, E. A., and Scott, C. B. 1994b. How goats learn to distinguish between novel foods that differ in postingestive consequences. J. Chem. Ecol. 20:609–624.Google Scholar
  38. REED, J. D. 1995. Nutritional toxicology of tannins and related polyphenols in forage legumes. J. Anim. Sci. 73:1516–1528.Google Scholar
  39. Scheline, R. R. 1991. CRC Handbook of Mammalian Metabolism of Plant Compounds. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida.Google Scholar
  40. Silanikove, N., Nitsan, Z., and Perevolotsky, A. 1994. Effect of a daily supplementation of polyethylene glycol on intake and digestion of tannin-containing leaves (Ceratonia siliqua) by sheep. J. Agric. Food Chem. 42:2844–2847.Google Scholar
  41. Silanikove, N., Gilboa, N., Nir, I., Perevolotsky, A., and Nitsan, Z. 1996a. Effect of a daily supplementation of polyethylene glycol on intake and digestion of tannin-containing leaves (Quercus calliprinos, Pistacia lentiscus and Ceratonia siliqua) by goats. J. Agric. Food Chem. 44:199–205.Google Scholar
  42. Silanikove, N., Shinder, D., Gilboa, N., Eyal, M., and Nitsan, Z. 1996b. Polyethylene glycol binding to plant samples as an assay for the biological effects of tannins: Predicting the negative effects of tannins in Mediterranean browse on rumen degradation.J. Agric. Chem. Food Sci. 44:3230–3234.Google Scholar
  43. Smith, A. D. 1959. Adequacy of some important browse species in overwintering mule deer. J. Range. Manage 12:9–13.Google Scholar
  44. Villalba, J. J., and Provenza, F. D. 1996. Preference for flavored wheat straw by lambs conditioned with intraruminal administrations of sodium propionate. J. Anim. Sci. 74:2362–2368.Google Scholar
  45. Villalba, J. J., and Provenza, F. D. 1997a. Preference for flavored wheat straw by lambs conditioned with intraruminal infusions of acetate and propionate. J. Anim. Sci. 75:2905–2914.Google Scholar
  46. Villalba, J. J., and Provenza, F. D. 1997b. Preference for flavoured foods by lambs conditioned with intraruminal administration of nitrogen. Br. J. Nutr. 78:545–561.Google Scholar
  47. Villalba, J. J., and Provenza, F. D. 1997c. Preference for wheat straw by lambs conditioned with intraruminal infusions of starch. Br. J. Nutr. 77:287–297.Google Scholar
  48. Wang, J., and Provenza, F. D. 1996. Dynamics of preference by sheep offered foods varying in flavors, nutrients and a toxin. J. Chem. Ecol. 23:275–288.Google Scholar
  49. Wang, J., and Provenza, F. D. 1997. Dynamics of preference by sheep offered foods varying in flavors, nutrients, and a toxin. J. Chem. Ecol. 23:275–288.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • E. A. Burritt
    • 1
  • F. D. Provenza
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Rangeland ResourcesUtah State UniversityLogan
  2. 2.Department of Rangeland ResourcesUtah State UniversityLogan

Personalised recommendations