Skip to main content
Log in

Toward an Assessment of Suitability of People with Mental Retardation for Cognitive Therapy

  • Published:
Cognitive Therapy and Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Forty people with mild mental retardation completed five tasks which assessed progressively their ability to identify emotions, link emotions to situations, and select either an emotion given a situation and evaluative belief, or an evaluative belief given a situation and emotion. Fewer people passed tasks including a belief than tasks assessing only an event–emotion link. Tasks involving a belief were more difficult if the belief and emotion were incongruent with the situation. We conclude that people with mild mental retardation may commonly have certain requisite skills to use cognitive therapy, yet many may require preparatory training to grasp the concept of cognitive mediation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Beck, J. (1995) Cognitive therapy: Basics and beyond. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borthwick-Duffy, S. A. (1994). Epidemiology and prevalence of psychopathology in people with mental retardation. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 62, 17-27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chadwick, P., Trower, P., & Dagnan, D. (in press). Measuring negative person evaluations: The Evaluative Beliefs Scale. Cognitive Therapy and Research.

  • Costello, C. G. (1992). Conceptual problems in current research on cognitive vulnerability to psychopathology. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 16, 379-390.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dagnan, D., & Chadwick, P. (1997). Cognitive therapy with people with learning disabilities: Assessment and intervention. In B. Kroese, D. Dagnan, & K. Loumidis (Eds.), Cognitive therapy for people with learning disabilities. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dagnan, D., & Proudlove, J. (1997). Using Makaton drawings to assess the ability to recognise facial expression of emotion in people with learning disabilities. Clinical Psychology Forum, 105, 3-5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, L., Dunn, L., Whetton, C., & Pintillie, D. (1982). The British Picture Vocabulary Scale. Windsor, UK: NFER-Nelson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, L. M. (1965). Expanded manual for the Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test. Minneapolis, MN: American Guidance Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, A. (1977). The basic clinical theory of rational emotive therapy. In A. Ellis & R. Grieger (Eds.), Handbook of rational-emotive therapy. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leffert, J. S., & Siperstein, G. N. (1996). Assessment of social-cognitive processes in children with mental retardation. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 100, 441-455.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lukasson, R., Coulter, D. L., Pollaway, E. A., Reiss, S., Schalock, R. L., Snell, M. E., Spitalnik, D. M., & Stark, J. A. (1992). Mental retardation: Definition, classification, and systems of supports. Washington, DC: American Association on Mental Retardation.

    Google Scholar 

  • MaGee, B. (1987). The great philosophers. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nezu, C. M., Nezu, A. M., Rothenburg, J. L., DelliCarpini, L., & Groag, I. (1995). Depression in adults with mild mental retardation: Are cognitive variables involved? Cognitive Therapy and Research, 19, 227-239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reed, J., & Clements, J. (1989). Assessing the understanding of emotional states in a population of adolescents and young adults with mental handicaps. Journal of Mental Deficiency Research, 33, 229-233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Safran, J. D., Segal, Z. V., Vallis, T. M., Shaw, B. F., & Samstag, L. W. (1993). Assessing patient suitability for short-term cognitive therapy with an interpersonal focus. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 17, 23-38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Safran, J. D., Vallis, T. M., Segal, Z. V., & Shaw, B. F. (1986). Assessment of core cognitive processes in cognitive therapy, Cognitive Therapy and Research, 10, 509-526.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stenfert-Kroeze, B., Dagnan, D., & Loumids, K. (1997). Cognitive behaviour therapy for people with learning disabilities. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teasdale, J. D., & Barnard, P. J. (1993). Affect, cognition and change: Remodelling depressive thought. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, M. (1985). Symbols for Makaton. Camberley, UK: Makaton Development Project.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wessler, R. A., & Wessler, R. L. (1980). The principles and practice of rational emotive therapy. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, J., Yeats, A., & Skipworth, G. (1974). Tables for statisticians. London: Stanley Thornes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zajonc, R. B. (1980). Feeling and thinking: preferences need no inferences. American Psychologist, 34, 151-175.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dagnan, D., Chadwick, P. & Proudlove, J. Toward an Assessment of Suitability of People with Mental Retardation for Cognitive Therapy. Cognitive Therapy and Research 24, 627–636 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005531226519

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005531226519

Navigation