Skip to main content
Log in

The Third Shift: Gender and Care Work Outside the Home

  • Published:
Qualitative Sociology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Caregiving remains women's work far more than men's. Although women and men often attribute this difference to “nature,” this paper argues for the importance of structure, especially in employment. At least to some extent, women's employment—especially in jobs similar to men's—reduces the care work they do for kin, if not for friends. Examining the different amount and meanings that women and men—like Euro-Americans and African Americans—ascribe to care work, I suggest we view such care work as a survival strategy as well as a demanding labor of love. In this context, recent social policies should be seen as not only privatizing care but also producing growing inequality as well as a vacuum of care.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Abel, Emily. (1991). Who cares for the elderly. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergmann, Barbara. (1997).Work-Family Policies and Equality BetweenWomen and Men. In Francine Blau and Ronald Ehrenberg (Eds.), Gender and family in the workplace (pp. 277–280). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bianchi, Suzanne. (1995). Changing Economic Roles of Women and Men. In Reynolds Farley (Ed.), State of the Union, Vol. 1 (pp. 107–154). New York: Russell Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brines, Julie. (1994). Economic Dependency, Gender and the Division of Labor at Home. American Journal of Sociology, 100, 652–688.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chodorow, Nancy. (1978). The Reproduction of Mothering. CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chodorow, Nancy. (1989). Feminism and Psychoanalytic Theory. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell, R. W. (1987). Gender and power: Society, the person and sexual politics. Cambridge: Polity in association with Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, Francine. (1999). Halving It All: How Equally Shared Parenting Works. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eagley, Alice. (1995). The Science and Politics of ComparingWomen and Men. American Psychologist, 50, 145–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, Cynthia. (1988). Deceptive Distinctions: Sex, Gender and the Social Order. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fausto-Sterling, Anne. (1985). Myths of Gender: Biological Theories About Women and Men. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, Claude. (1982). To Dwell Among Friends: Personal Networks in Town and City. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher, Sally and Gerstel, Naomi. (2000). Connections and Constraints: The Effects of Children on Caregiving. Journal of Marriage and the Family, August.

  • Garey, Anita I. (1999). Weaving Work and Motherhood. PA: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerson, Kathleen. (1985). Hard Choices: How Women Decide About Work, Career and Motherhood. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerson, Kathleen. (1987). Emerging Social Divisions Among Women: Implications for Welfare State Politics. Politics and Society, 15, 213–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerson, Kathleen. (1993). No Man's Land: Men's changing commitments to family and work. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerstel, Naomi. (2000). Family Power and Family Policies: FMLA and TANF. Paper presented at Conference on Power in America: The Big Issues, Leroy Neiman Center Group. UCLA, May.

  • Gerstel, Naomi and Gallagher, Sally K. (1994). Caring for Kith and Kin: Gender, employment, and the Privatization of Care. Social Problems, 41, 519–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerstel, Naomi and Gallagher, Sally K. (Forthcoming). Men's Caregiving: Gender and the Contingent Character of Care. Gender & Society.

  • Gerstel, Naomi and McGonagle, Katherine. (1999). Job Leaves and the Limits of the Family and Medical Leave Act: The Effects of Gender, Race and Family. Work and Occupations, 26, 510–534.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan, Carol. (1982). In a Different Voice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenstein, Theodore. (2000). Economic Dependence, Gender and the Division of Labor in the Home. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 332–335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, Sanjiv. (1999). The Effects ofTransitions in Marital Status on Men's Performance of Housework. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 61, 700–711.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hochschild, Arlie, with Machung, Anne. (1989). The Second Shift:Working Parents and the Revolution at Home. New York: Viking.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lennon, Mary Clare and Rosenfield, Sarah. (1994). Relative Fairness and the Division of Household Labor. American Journal of Sociology, 100, 506–531.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loprest, Pamela. (1999). How Families that Left Welfare are Doing: A National Picture. The Urban Institute, Series B, # B-1, August.

  • Lorber, Judith. (1994). Paradoxes of Gender. Ct: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maccoby, Eleanor. (1998). The two sexes. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marks, N. (1996). Caregiving across the Lifespan: National prevalence and predictors.Family Relations, 45, 27–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliker, Stacey J. (2000). Examining Care atWelfare's End. In Madonna Harrington Meyer (Ed.), Care Work: Gender, Labor, and Welfare States (pp. 167–325). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Press, Julie and Townsley, Eleanor. (1998). Wives' and Husbands' Housework Reporting: Gender, Class and Social Desirability. Gender & Society, 12, 218–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reskin, Barbara and Padavic, Irene. (1994).Women and Men atWork. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Risman, Barbara. (1998). Gender Vertigo. CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roos, Patricia and Gatta, Mary. (1999). The Gender Gap in Earnings: Trends, Explanations, Prospects. In Gary Powell (Ed.), Handbook of Gender and Work (pp. 95–123). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossi, Alice S. and Rossi, Peter H. (1990). Of Human Bonding: Parent-child relations across the life course. New York: Aldine De Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarkisian, Natalia, Gerena, Marianna and Gerstel, Naomi. (2000). More or Less Kin: Addressing Debates on CareWork in African American Communities. Paper presented at Carework Conference. Washington, DC.

  • Udry, J. Richard, Morris, N.M. and Kovenock, J. (1995). Androgen Effects on Women's Gendered Behavior. Journal of Biosocial Science, 27, 359–368.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walzer, Susan. (1998.) Thinking about the Baby: Gender and Transitions into Parenthood. PA: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gerstel, N. The Third Shift: Gender and Care Work Outside the Home. Qualitative Sociology 23, 467–483 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005530909739

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005530909739

Navigation