Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Medical Resource Planning for Combat Operations: Utilizing Percentile Estimates as an Alternative to the Mean

  • Published:
Journal of Medical Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Forecasting medical resource requirements during combat operations is dependent upon reliable estimates of the anticipated patient load. Traditionally, mean patient load estimations are used to determine the medical resources and supplies. However, these approximations can underestimate the resources needed to treat casualties during certain peak periods of an operation. This paper discusses the use of percentile estimates in forecasting patient loads as an alternative to using measures of central tendency. To assist in providing alternative estimates of ground casualty rates, the SLICECAS model has been developed to compute the varying percentile estimates. Design and construction of the model is based on data and trends observed during previous combat operations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Blood, C.G., Zouris, J.M., and Rotblatt, D., Using the Ground Forces Casualty Forecasting System (FORECAS) to Project Casualty Sustainment, NHRC Technical Report No. 97-39, Naval Health Research Center, San Diego, Calif., 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Blood, C.G., Rotblatt, D., and Marks, J.S., Incorporating Adversary-Specific Adjustments into the FORECAS Ground Casualty Projection System, NHRC Technical Report No. 96-10J. Naval Health Research Center, San Diego, Calif., 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Medical Analysis Tool Version 1.0 Technical Reference Manual, Booz Allen & Hamilton Inc, McLean, Va, 1998.

  4. Dupuy, T.N., Attrition: Forecasting Battle Casualties and Equipment Losses in Modern War, Hero Books, Fairfax, Va, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Blood, C.G., Gauker, E.D., Anderson, M.E., et al., Projection of Battlefield Medical Casualties Among U.S. Marine Forces for Various Theaters of Operations, NHRC Technical Report No. 93-35, Naval Health Research Center Report, San Diego, Calif., 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Blood, C.G., Gauker, E.D., Jolly, R., and Pugh, W.M., Comparisons of Medical Presentation and Admission Rates During Various Combat Operations, NHRC Technical Report No. 93-12. Naval Health Research Center, San Diego, Calif., 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  7. O'Donnell, E., and Blood, C.G., Distribution Characteristics of Marine Corps Casualty and Illness Rates, NHRC Technical Report No. 93-20, Naval Health Research Center, San Diego, Calif., 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Berry, D.A., and Lindgren, B.W., Statistics: Theory and Methods, Brooks/Cole Publishing Company, Pacific Grove, Calif., 1990.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Modeling and Simulation Program, Naval Health Research Center, P.O. Box 85122, San Diego, California, 92186-5122

    James M. Zouris & Christopher G. Blood

Authors
  1. James M. Zouris
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Christopher G. Blood
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zouris, J.M., Blood, C.G. Medical Resource Planning for Combat Operations: Utilizing Percentile Estimates as an Alternative to the Mean. Journal of Medical Systems 24, 379–387 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005500811074

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005500811074

Search

Navigation