Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Interrogative Quantifiers within Scope

  • Published:
Linguistics and Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alshawi, Hiyan (ed.): 1992, The Core Language Engine, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aoun, Joseph and Yen-hui Audrey Li: 1993, Syntax of Scope, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Åqvist, Lennart: 1965, A New Approach to the Logical Theory of Interrogatives, Filosofiska Föreningen, Uppsala. (Reprint: Tübingen: Narr 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, Sigrid: 1996, 'Quantified Structures as Barriers for LF Movement', Natural Language Semantics 4, 1–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beghelli, Filippo: 1997, The Syntax of Distributivity and Pair-List Readings, in Szabolcsi (ed.), pp. 349–408.

  • Belnap, Nuel D., Jr.: 1963, An Analysis of Questions: Preliminary Report, System Development Corporation, Santa Monica, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belnap, Nuel D., Jr.: 1982, 'Questions and Answers in Montague Grammar', in Stanley Peters and Esa Saarinen (eds.), Processes, Beliefs, and Questions, Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 165–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, Michael: 1979, Questions in Montague Grammar, Indiana University Linguistics Club, Bloomington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berman, Stephen: 1991, On the Semantics and Logical Form of wh-Clauses, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berman, Stephen: 1994, Wh-Clauses and Quantificational Variability, Arbeitspapiere des Sonderforschungsbereichs 340 (Stuttgart/Tübingen), Bericht Nr. 61.

  • Brody, Michael: 1995, Lexico-Logical Form: A Radically Minimalist Theory, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, Gregory N.: 1977, Reference to Kinds in English, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chierchia, Gennaro: 1993, 'Questions with Quantifiers', Natural Language Semantics 1, 181–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dayal [former: Srivastav], Veneeta: 1991, Wh Dependencies in Hindi and the Theory of Grammar, Ph.D. dissertation, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engdahl, Elisabet: 1986, Constituent Questions. The Syntax and Semantics of Questions with Special Reference to Swedish, Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frege, Gottlob: 1884, Die Grundlagen der Arithmetik. Eine logisch mathematische Untersuchung über den Begriff der Zahl, Koeben, Breslau.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey, Werner: 1993, Syntaktische Bedingungen für die semantische Interpretation, Akademie, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groenendijk, Jeroen and Martin Stokhof: 1982, 'Semantic Analysis of wh-complements', Linguistics and Philosophy 5, 173–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groenendijk, Jeroen and Martin Stokhof: 1984, Studies on the Semantics of Questions and the Pragmatics of Answers, Academisch Proefschrift, Universiteit van Amsterdam.

  • Groenendijk, Jeroen and Martin Stokhof: 1989, 'Type-Shifting Rules and the Semantics of Interrogatives', in: Gennaro Chierchia and Barbara H. Partee and Raymond Turner (eds.), Properties, Types and Meaning, Volume II, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp. 21–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haas-Spohn, Ulrike: 1989, 'Zur Interpretation der Einstellungszuschreibungen', in Gabriel Falkenberg (Hrsg.), Wissen, Wahrnehmen, Glauben: epistemische Ausdrücke und propositionale Einstellungen, Niemeyer, Tübingen, pp. 49–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heim, Irene: 1991, 'Artikel und Definitheit', in Arnim von Stechow and Dieter Wunderlich (eds.), Semantics. An International Handbook of Contemporary Research, de Gruyter, Berlin and New York, pp. 487–535.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heim, Irene: 1994, 'Interrogative Semantic's and Karttunen's Semantics for Know' in R. Buchalla and A. Mittwoch (eds.), IATL 1. The Proceedings of the Ninth Annual Conference and the Workshop on Discourse of the Israel Association for Theoretical Linguistics, Academon, Jerusalem, pp. 128–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higginbotham, James: 1991, 'Interrogatives I', in Lisa L. S. Cheng and Hamida Demirdash (eds.), More on wh-Movement, MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, vol. 15, pp. 47–76.

  • Higginbotham, James: 1993, 'Interrogatives', in Kenneth Hale and Samuel Jay Keyser (eds.), The View from Building 20, Essays in Linguistics in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 195–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higginbotham, James: 1996, 'The Semantics of Questions', in Shalom Lappin (ed.), The Handbook of Contemporary Semantic Theory, Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 361–383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higginbotham, James and Robert May: 1981, 'Questions, Quantifiers, and Crossing', The Linguistic Review 1, 41–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hintikka, Jaakko: 1976, The Semantics of Questions and the Question of Semantics, North-Holland, Amsterdam. (Acta Philosophica Fennica, vol. 28,no. 4).

    Google Scholar 

  • Höhle, Tilman N.: 1992, 'Über Verum-Fokus im Deutschen', in: Joachim Jacobs (Hrsg.), Informationsstruktur und Grammatik, Westdeutscher Verlag, Opladen, pp. 112–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoji, Hajime: 1986, 'Scope Interpretation in Japanese and its Theoretical Implications', in Proceedings of the West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, vol. 5, pp. 87–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ioup, Georgette: 1975a, 'Some Universals for Quantifier Scope', in John P. Kimball (ed.), Syntax and Semantics 4, Academic Press, New York, pp. 37–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ioup, Georgette: 1975b, The Treatment of Quantifier Scope in a Transformational Grammar, Ph.D. dissertation, University of New York.

  • Joo, Yanghee Shim: 1989, A Cross-Linguistic Approach to Quantification in Syntax, Ph.D. dissertation, Madison, University of Wisconsin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karttunen, Lauri: 1977, 'Syntax and Semantics of Questions', Linguistics and Philosophy 1, 3–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karttunen, Lauri and Stanley Peters: 1980, 'Interrogative Quantifiers', in: Christian Rohrer (ed.), Time, Tense and Quantifiers, Niemeyer, Tübingen, pp. 181–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, Jerrold and Paul M. Postal: 1964, An Integrated Theory of Linguistic Description, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Soowon: 1991, Chain Scope and Quantification Structure, Ph.D. dissertation, Brandeis University.

  • Krifka, Manfred, Francis Jeffry Pelletier, Gregory N. Carlson, Alice ter Meulen, Gennaro Chierchia, and Godehard Link: 1995, 'Genericity: An Introduction', in Gregory N. Carlson and Francis Jeffry Pelletier (eds.), The Generic Book, University of Chicago Press, Chicago and London, pp. 1–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kripke, Saul: 1979, 'Speaker's Reference and Semantic Reference', in: Peter A. French, Theodore E. Uehling, Jr. and Howard K. Wettstein (eds.), Contemporary Perspectives in the Philosophy of Language, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, pp. 6–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kroch, Anthony S.: 1974, The Semantics of Scope in English, Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.

  • Kuno, Susumu: 1991, 'Remarks on Quantifier Scope', in Heizo Nakajima (ed.), Current English Linguistics in Japan, Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin, pp. 261–287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurtzman, Howard S. and Maryellen C. MacDonald: 1993, 'Resolution of Quantifier Scope Ambiguities', Cognition 48, 243–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lahiri, Utpal: 1991, Embedded Interrogatives and Predicates that Embed Them, Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.

  • Landman, Fred: 1989, 'Groups I', Linguistics and Philosophy 12, 559–606.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, David: 1991, Parts of Classes, Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Link, Godehard: 1983, 'The Logical Analysis of Plurals and Mass Terms: A Lattice-Theoretical Approach', in Rainer Bäuerle, Christoph Schwarz and Arnim von Stechow (eds.), Meaning, Use, and Interpretation, de Gruyter, Berlin and New York, pp. 302–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Feng-hsi: 1990, Scope Dependency in English and Chinese, Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.

    Google Scholar 

  • May, Robert: 1985, Logical Form: Its Structure and Derivation, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • May, Robert: 1989, 'Interpreting Logical Form', Linguistics and Philosophy 12, 387–435.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pafel, Jürgen: 1991, 'Zum relativen Skopus von w-und Q-Phrasen (w/Q-Interaktion)', in Marga Reis and Inger Rosengren (Hrsg.), Fragesätze und Fragen, Niemeyer, Tübingen, pp. 145–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pafel, Jürgen: 1993, 'Scope and Word Order', in Joachim Jacobs, Arnim von Stechow, Wolfgang Sternefeld and Theo Vennemann (eds.), Syntax. An International Handbook of Contemporary Research, Volume 1, de Gruyter, Berlin and New York. pp. 867–880.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pafel, Jürgen: 1996a, 'Die syntaktische und semantische Struktur von “was für”-Phrasen', Linguistische Berichte 161, 37–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pafel, Jürgen: 1996b, 'Absolute and Relative. On Scope in German wh-Sentences Including w...w-Construction', in Uli Lutz and Gereon Müller (eds.), Papers on wh-Scope Marking. Arbeitspapiere des Sonderforschungsbereichs 340 (Stuttgart/Tübingen), Bericht Nr. 76, pp. 231–256.

  • Pafel, Jürgen: 1997, Skopus und logische Struktur. Studien zum Quantorenskopus im Deutschen, Habilitationsschrift, Universität Tübingen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reich, Ingo: 1997, Wer will wann wieviel wissen? Eine Untersuchung verschiedener Frage-Antwort-Bedingungen im Deutschen, Arbeitspapiere des Sonderforschungsbereichs 340 (Stuttgart/Tübingen), Bericht Nr. 89.

  • Reinhart, Tanya: 1983, Anaphora and Semantic Interpretation, Croom Helm, London and Sydney.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reis, Marga: 1992, 'The Category of Invariant 'alles' in wh-Clauses', in Rosemarie Tracy (ed.), Who Climbs the Grammar Tree? Niemeyer, Tübingen, pp. 465–492.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz, Bernhard: 1993, Gewisse Fälle eingebetteter Fragesätze, MA thesis, Universität Tübingen.

  • Schwarzschild, Roger: 1992, 'Types of Plural Individuals', Linguistics and Philosophy 15, 641–675.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharvy, Richard: 1980, 'A More General Theory of Definite Descriptions', The Philosophical Review 89, 607–624.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simons, Peter M.: 1987, Parts. A Study in Ontology, Clarendon, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swart, Henriëtte de: 1992, 'Intervention Effects, Monotonicity and Scope', in Chris Barker and David Dowty (eds.), Proceedings from the Second Conference on Semantics and Linguistic Theory (Ohio State University May 1–3, 1992). The Ohio State University Working Papers in Linguistics No. 40, pp. 387–406.

  • Szabolcsi, Anna: 1997, Quantifiers in Pair-List Readings, in Szabolcsi (ed.), pp. 311–347.

  • Szabolcsi, Anna (ed.): 1997, Ways of Scope Taking, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • VanLehn, Kurt A.: 1978, Determining the Scope of English Quantifiers, Technical Report, Artifical Intelligence Laboratory MIT.

  • Zimmermann, Thomas Ede: 1993, 'On the Proper Treatment of Opacity in Certain Verbs', Natural Language Semantics 1, 149–179.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Deutsches Seminar, Universität Tübingen, Wilhelmstraβe 50, D-72074, Tübingen, Germany

    Jürgen Pafel

Authors
  1. Jürgen Pafel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pafel, J. Interrogative Quantifiers within Scope. Linguistics and Philosophy 22, 255–310 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005499211238

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005499211238

Keywords

Search

Navigation