Skip to main content
Log in

Relations – through thick and thin

  • Published:
Erkenntnis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

REFERENCES

  • Armstrong, D.: 1989, Universals. An Opinionated Introduction, Westview Press, Boulder, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bacon, J.: 1995, Universals and Property Instances: The Alphabet of Being (Aristotelian Society series, Vol. 15), Blackwell, Oxford, UK; Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, K.: 1990, Abstract Particulars, Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chisholm, R.: 1976, Person and Object: A Metaphysical Study, Allen & Unwin, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denkel, A.: 1996, Object and Property, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, G.: 1985, Collected Papers, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fine, K.: 1995, ‘The Logic of Essence’, Journal of Philosophical Logic 24, 241–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geach, P.: 1981, Logic Matters, Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henninger, M. G.: 1989, Relations. Medieval Theories 1250-1325, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Irwin, T. H.: 1990. Aristotle's First Principles, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johansson, I.: 1989, Ontological Investigations, RKP, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, B.: 1995, ‘Making Comparisons’, Mind 104, 369–392.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kripke, S.: 1993, Naming and Necessity, Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Küng, G.: 1967, Ontology and the Logistic Analysis of Language: an Enquiry into theContemporary Views on Universals, D. Reidel, Dordrecht/Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maund, B.: 1995, Colours. Their Nature and Representation, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meinong, A. von: 1971, ‘Hume-Studien II: Zur Relationstheorie’, Gesamtausgabe, Bd. II, Graz: Akademische Druck-und Verlagsanstalt, pp. 1–172, (1882).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mugnai, M.: 1992, Leibniz' Theory of Relations, F. Steiner, Stuttgart. Studia Leibnitiana, Supplementa, Vol. 28.

  • Mulligan, K., Simons, P. and Smith, B.: 1984, ‘Truth-Makers’, Philosophy and PhenomenologicalResearch XIV, 287–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulligan, K.: 1991, ‘Colours, Corners and Complexity: Meinong and Wittgenstein on some Internal Relations’, in B. C. van Fraassen, B. Skyrms and W. Spohn (eds.), Existenceand Explanation: Essays in Honor of Karel Lambert, The University of Western Ontario Series in Philosophy of Science, Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 77–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulligan, K.: 1993, ‘Internal Relations’, Working Papers in Philosophy, 2, RSSS, Australian National University, Canberra, Proceedings of the 1992 Canberra Metaphysics conference, Brian Garrett and Peter Menzies (eds.), pp. 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulligan, K.: 1993a, ‘Proposizione, stato di cose e altri concetti formali nel pensiero di Wittgenstein e Husserl’, L'uomo, un segno, Fascicolo speciale: Wittgenstein contemporaneo, a cura di A. Gargani, pp. 41–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulligan, K.: 1997, ‘The Essence of Language: Wittgenstein's Builders and Bühler's Bricks’, Revue de Métaphysique et Morale 2, 193–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulligan, K.: 1997a, ‘How Perception Fixes Reference’, in A. Burri (ed.), Language andThought/Sprache und Denken, de Gruyter, Berlin/New York, pp. 122–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulligan, K.: 1998, ‘Perception, Predicates and Particulars’, in D. Fisette (ed.), Consciousnessand Intentionality: Models and Modalities of Attribution, The Western Ontario Series in Philosophy of Science, Kluwer, 237–282, forthcoming.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulligan, K.: 1998a, ‘From Appropriate Emotions to Values’, in P. Menzies (ed.), Secondary Qualities Generalized, The Monist 81, 162–190.

  • Russell, B.: 1919, Introduction to Mathematical Philosophy, London (IMP).

  • Russell, B.: 1956, ‘Logical Atomism’, in R. Marsh (ed.), Logic and Knowledge, London (LA).

  • Russell, B.: 1959, My Philosophical Development, London (MPD).

  • Russell, B.: 1966, ‘The Monistic Theory of Truth’, in Philosophical Essays (MTT).

  • Russell, B.: 1972, The Principles of Mathematics (PoM).

  • Russell, B.: 1973, ‘Meinong's Theory of Complexes and Assumptions’ (1904), Essays inAnalysis, D. Lackey (ed.), Allen & Unwin, London, pp. 21–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, B.: 1986, The Problems of Philosophy, Oxford University Press (PoP).

  • Schönberger, R.: 1994, Relation als Vergleich. Die Relationstheorie des Johannes Buridanim Kontext seines Denkens und der Scholastik, E. J. Brill, Leiden, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Searle, J.: 1995, The Construction of Social Reality, Penguin Books, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simons, P.: 1987, Parts. A Study in Ontology, Clarendon, Oxford.

  • Simons, P.: 1998, ‘Relational Tropes’, in G. Haefliger and P. Simons (eds.), AnalyticPhenomenology, FS for Guido Kueng, Kluwer, forthcoming.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, B.: 1997, ‘On Substances, Accidents and Universals: In Defence of a Constituent Ontology’, Philosophical Papers 27, 105–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tegtmeier, E.: 1992, Grundzüge einer kategorialen Ontologie. Dinge, Eigenschaften,Sachverhalte, Alber, Freiburg.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Relations – through thick and thin. Erkenntnis 48, 325–353 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005454805376

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005454805376

Keywords

Navigation