Skip to main content
Log in

Variables influencing parental perception of inherited metabolic diseases before and after genetic counselling

  • Published:
Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease

Abstract

The present study was undertaken to characterize the variables that influence parental perception of metabolic disorders and their genetic origin before and after genetic counselling, the effect of counselling on parental attitudes towards prenatal diagnosis and pregnancy termination, and the factors affecting parental coping with burden.

Parents of children with metabolic diseases from 32 Arab-Muslim families were interviewed, answering a pre-structured questionnaire. These interviews indicate the following. (1) Traditional belief and religious commitment are more important determinants than education in parental perception of inherited metabolic diseases. (2) The number of affected children has a greater impact on parental evaluation of the burden than the number of healthy children. The social component, i.e. the way families are viewed by society, is the most significant factor of the burden. (3) Parents use different techniques to divide responsibility regarding reproduction. Having a healthy child and the availability of prenatal diagnosis and pregnancy termination were the two most important factors in parental reproductive decision making. In the absence of a healthy child and when the burden was perceived as too heavy, parents tended ‘not to decide’. (4) Parental attitude to pregnancy termination was dependent on two factors: religious commitment (leading to objection) and severity of disease (leading to flexibility and approval). (5) In almost all families, genetic counselling altered parental perception of the disease and its hereditary origin.

We conclude that genetic counselling and population education may be helpful in the prevention of consanguineous marriages and in family planning, even in a society that values traditional beliefs very highly.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Beeson D, Golbus MS (1985) Decision making: whether or not to have prenatal diagnosis and abortion for X-linked conditions. Am J Med Genet 20: 107–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekwo EE, Kim JO, Gosselink CA (1987) Parental perceptions of the burden of genetic disease. Am J Med Genet 28: 955–963.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frets PG, Duivenvoorden HJ, Verhage F, Miermeijer MF, Van de Berge SMM, Galjaard H (1990) Factors influencing the reproductive decision after genetic counseling. Am J Med Genet 35: 496–502.

    Google Scholar 

  • Good BJ, Good MD (1981) The meaning of symptoms: a cultural hermeneutic model for clinical practice. In Eisenberg L, Kleinman A, eds. The Relevance of Social Science for Medicine. Boston: D. Riedel, 165–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Handelman L, Menahem S, Eisenbruch IM (1989). Transcultural understanding of a hereditary disorder. Mucopolysaccharidosis VI in a Vietnamese family. Clin Pediatr 28: 470–473.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaber L, Bailey-Wilson J, Haj-Yehia M, Hernandez J, Shohat M (1994) Consanguineous matings in Israeli-Arab community. Arch Pediatr Adolesc. Med 148: 412–415.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janis IL, Mann L (1977) Decision Making: A Psychological Analysis of Conflict, Choice and Commitment. New York: The Free Press, 10–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirscht JP (1988) The health belief model and predictions of health actions. In Gochman DS, ed. Health Behavior: Emerging Research Perspectives. New York: Plenum Press, 27–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleinman A (1978) Concepts and a model for the comparison of medical systems as cultural systems. Soc Sci Med 12: 85–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lippman-Hand A, Fraser FC (1979a): Genetic counseling: provision and reception of information. Am J Med Genet 3: 113–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lippman-Hand A, Fraser FC (1979b) Genetic counseling - the postcounseling period: I. ParentÏ s perceptions of uncertainty. Am J Med Genet 4: 51–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lippman-Hand A, Fraser FC (1979c) Genetic counseling - the postcounseling period: II. Making reproductive choices. Am J Med Genet 4: 73–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenstock IM (1974) The Health Belief Model and preventive health behavior. Health Educ Monogr 2: 354–386.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sagi M, Shiloh Sh, Cohen T (1992) Application of the Health Belief Model in a study on parents' intentions to utilize prenatal diagnosis of cleft lip and/or palate. Am J Med Genet 44: 326–333.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shiloh S, Sagi M (1989) Effect of framing on the perception of genetic recurrence risks. Am J Med Genet 33: 130–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shilo S, Saxe L (1989) Perception of risk in genetic counseling. Psychol Health 3: 45–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tversky A, Kahneman D (1974) Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science 185: 1124–1131.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Saleem, R., Gofin, R., Ben-Neriah, Z. et al. Variables influencing parental perception of inherited metabolic diseases before and after genetic counselling. J Inherit Metab Dis 21, 769–780 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005453301377

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005453301377

Keywords

Navigation