Abstract
The present study investigates the ways in which Japanese speakers negotiate their opinions in conversational interaction. On the one hand, speakers are apt to exaggerate a particular aspect of a given issue in asserting their opinion, on the other hand, they may also incorporate a self-qualification admitting a potential problem in their claim. By expressing their awareness of the problem before it is pointed out by the co-participants, the speakers seem to get license to proffer an exaggerated or overgeneralized claim and to increase their chance of receiving an affiliative response. This study explicates the mechanism through which such a self-qualifying clause emerges in the development of opinion-negotiation sequences. Further, as a contribution to a growing body of research on "interaction and grammar" (Ochs, Schegloff, and Thompson, 1996), this study explores the use of "contrastive" markers, -kedo and demo, in constructing turns and sequences in opinion-negotiation. The data demonstrate these two structurally different types of markers play distinct roles in differentiating and yet conjoining the speakers' assertion and self-qualification.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ford, C.E. and Fox, B.A. (1996). Interactional motivations for reference formulation: He had. This guy had, a beautiful, thirty-two O:lds. In B.A. Fox (Ed.), Studies in Anaphora. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Goodwin, C. (1981). Conversational Organization: Interaction Between Speakers and Hearers. New York: Academic Press.
Goodwin, C. and Goodwin, M.H. (1987). Concurrent operations on talk: Notes on the interactive organization of assessments. IPrA Papers in Pragmatics 1 (1): 1-54.
Hakulinen, A. and Sorjonen, M. (1993). Research on spoken interaction in Finland. Research on Language and Social Interaction 26 (4): 409-426.
Hayashi, M. (1994). A comparative study of self-repair in English and Japanese conversation. In N. Akatsuka (Ed.), Japanese Korean Linguistics 4. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
Hayashi, M., Mori, J and Takagi, T. (forthcoming). Contingent achievement of co-tellership in a Japanese conversation: An analysis of talk, gaze and gesture. In C.E. Ford, B.A. Fox, and S.A. Thompson (Eds.), The Language of Turn and Sequence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Houtkoop, H. (1987). Establishing Agreement. Province: Foris Publications.
Jacobs, S. and Jackson, S. (1989). Building a model of conversational argument. In B. Dervin (Ed.), Rethinking Communication. Newbury Park: Sage.
Jefferson, G. (1972). Side sequences. In D. Sundow (Ed.), Studies in Social Interaction. New York: Free Press.
Jones, K. (1990). Conflict in Japanese Conversation. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Michigan.
Kim, K. and Suh, K. (1994). The discourse connective nikka in Korean Conversation. In N. Akatsuka (Ed.), Japanese Korean Linguistics 4. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
Luke, K.K. (1990). Utterance Particles in Cantonese Conversation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
McGloin, N. (1989). A Student's Guide to Japanese Grammar. Tokyo: Taishukan.
Mizutani, O. and Mizutani, N. (1981). Nihongo Notes. Tokyo: Japan Times.
Mori, J. (1995). Interactional functions of-kedo clauses in Japanese conversation. A paper presented at the Annual Conference of AAAL, Long Beach, California.
Mori, J. (1996). Negotiating Agreement and Disagreement: The Use of Connective Expressions in Japanese Conversations. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Wisconsin-Madison.
Mori, J. (forthcoming). Negotiating Agreement and Disagreement in Japanese: Connective Expressions and Turn Construction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Morita, Y. (1989). Kiso Nihongo [Basic Japanese]. Tokyo: Japan Times.
Ochs, E., Schegloff, E.A. and Thompson, S.A. (Eds.) (1996). Interaction and Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Oishi, T. (1985). A Description of Japanese Final Particles in Context. Ph. D. Dissertation. University of Michigan.
Ono, T. and Thompson, S.A. (1996). What can conversation tell us about syntax? In P.W. Davis (Ed.), Alternative Linguistics: Descriptive and Theoretical Modes. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Onodera, N.O. (1993). Pragmatic Change in Japanese: Conjunctions and Interjections as Discourse Markers. Ph.D. Dissertation. Georgetown University.
Park, Y. (1996). The Korean connective nuntey in conversational discourse. In N. Akatsuka, S. Iwasaki and S. Strauss (Eds.), Japanese Korean Linguistics 5. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
Pomerantz, A. (1984a). Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes. In M.J. Atkinson and J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of Social Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pomerantz, A. (1984b). Pursuing a response. In M.J. Atkinson and J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of Social Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pomerantz, A. (1986). Extreme case formulations: A way of legitimizing claims. Human Studies 9: 219-229.
Sacks, H. (1987). On the preferences for agreement and contiguity in sequences in conversation. In G. Button and J.R.E. Lee (Eds.), Talk and Social Organization. Clevendon: Multilingual Matters.
Schegloff, E.A. (1979). The relevance of repair for syntax-for-conversation. In T. Givon (Ed.), Syntax and Semantics 12: Discourse and Syntax. New York: Academic Press.
Schegloff, E.A. (1996). Turn organization: one intersection of grammar and interaction. In E. Ochs, E.A. Schegloff and S.A. Thompson (Eds.), Interaction and Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schegloff, E.A., Jefferson, G. and Sacks, H. (1977). The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language 53 (2): 361-382.
Schiffrin, D. (1987). Discourse Markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sorjonen, M. (1996). On discourse particles in Finnish. In E. Ochs, E.A. Schegloff and S.A. Thompson (Eds.), Interaction and Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tsujimura, A. (1987). Some characteristics of the Japanese way of communication. In D.L. Kincaid (Ed.), Communication Theory: Eastern and Western Perspectives. San Diego: Academic Press.
Watanabe, S. (1993). Cultural differences in framing: American and Japanese group discussions. In D. Tannen (Ed.), Framing in Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mori, J. Well I May Be Exaggerating But Self-Qualifying Clauses in Negotiation of Opinions Among Japanese Speakers. Human Studies 22, 447–473 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005440010221
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005440010221