Advertisement

Journal of Chemical Ecology

, Volume 26, Issue 3, pp 705–719 | Cite as

Responses of Wild Norway Rats (Rattus norvegicus) to Predator Odors

  • Gary N. Bramley
  • Joseph R. Waas
  • Harold V. Henderson
Article

Abstract

If rats could be shown to avoid the odors of predators, then conservation managers could manipulate this behavior to exclude rats from important conservation sites. We evaluated the ability of six predator odors to elicit avoidance responses by wild-caught Norway rats (Rattus norvegicus) from two New Zealand populations (Kapiti Island and North Island). Kapiti Island is free of mammalian predators, while the North Island has established populations of felids, canids, and mustelids. Three of the predator odors were real and three were synthesized volatile ingredients of real animal feces or urine. We compared the rats' responses to predator odors with their responses to three natural herbivore odors. We used a Y maze, and rats were offered the choice of an odor in one arm of the maze and distilled water in the other arm. Each choice arm was ducted at the entrance to remove air and the odor. We recorded: (1) the time until the rat left the first arm of the maze, (2) the time until the rat visited each arm, (3) the number of visits to each arm, (4) the amount of time spent in each arm, and (5) a total activity score for each rat. Kapiti rats showed an aversion to five of the six predator odors, despite never having encountered them before. Kapiti rats visited herbivore odors more often than carnivore odors and were less active in the presence of carnivore odors than they were when tested with herbivore odors. In addition, Kapiti rats approached some herbivore odors more quickly than they approached carnivore odors. North Island rats appeared to avoid cat urine, but despite being predator experienced, did not show a consistent aversion to the carnivore odors we tested. Both samples of rats, but particularly the North Island group, showed high individual variation. We conclude that predator odors are unlikely to be an effective management tool for all populations of this species of rat because of this high individual variability and the likelihood that each island population will differ in its responses to a given odor.

Y maze odor discrimination predator odors semiochemicals avoidance behaviors Rattus norvegicus mustelids Felis catus 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Atkinson, I. A. E. 1985. The spread of commensal species of Rattus to oceanic islands and their effects on island avifaunas, pp. 35-81, in P. J. Moors (ed.), Conservation of Island Birds: Case Studies for the Management of Threatened Island Species. Technical Publications No. 3. International Council for Bird Preservation, Girton, Cambridge, U.K.Google Scholar
  2. Berdoy, M., and Smith, P. 1993. Arms race and rat race: Adaptations against poisoning in the brown rat. Rev. Ecol. (Terre Vie) 48:215–228.Google Scholar
  3. Boag, B., and Mlotkiewicz, J. A. 1994. Effect of odor derived from lion feces on behavior of wild rabbits. J. Chem. Ecol. 24:49–66.Google Scholar
  4. Brunton, C. F. A., Macdonald, D. W., and Buckle, A. P. 1993. Behavioural resistance towards poison baits in brown rats (Rattus norvegicus). Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 38:159–174.Google Scholar
  5. Burwash, M. D., Tobin, M. E., Woolhouse, A. D., and Sullivan, T. P. 1998. Laboratory evaluation of predator odors for eliciting an avoidance response in roof rats (Rattus rattus). J. Chem. Ecol. 24:49–66.Google Scholar
  6. Cocke, R., and Thiessen, D. D. 1986. Chemocommunication among prey and predator species. Anim. Learn. Behav. 14:90–92.Google Scholar
  7. Cowan, P. E. 1992. The eradication of introduced Australian brushtail possums, Trichosurus vulpecula, from Kapiti Island, a New Zealand nature reserve. Biol. Conserv. 61:217–226.Google Scholar
  8. Dell'omo, G., Fiore, M., and Alleva, E. 1994. Strain differences in mouse response to odours and predators. Behav. Proc. 32:105–116.Google Scholar
  9. Dickman, C. R. 1992. Predation and habitat shift in the house mouse, Mus domesticus. Ecology 73:313–332.Google Scholar
  10. Engelhart, A., and Muller-Schwarze, D. 1995. Responses of beaver (Castor canadensis Kuhl) to predator chemicals. J. Chem. Ecol. 21:1349–1364.Google Scholar
  11. Fenn, M. G. P., and MacDonald, D. W. 1995. Use of middens by red foxes: Risk reverses rhythms of rats. J. Mammal. 76:130–136.Google Scholar
  12. Garbe, C. M., Kemble, E. D., and Rawleigh, J. M. 1993. Novel odors evoke risk assessment and suppress appetitive behaviors in mice. Aggress. Behav. 19:447–454.Google Scholar
  13. Gliwicz, J. 1980. Island populations of rodents: Their organisation and functioning. Biol. Rev. 55:109–138.Google Scholar
  14. Heale, V. R., and Vanderwolf, C. H. 1994. Toluene and weasel (2-propylthietane) odors suppress feeding in the rat. J. Chem. Ecol. 20:2953–2958.Google Scholar
  15. Innes, J. G., Warburton, B., Williams, D. S., Speed, H., and Bradfield, P. 1995. Large-scale poisoning of ship rats (Rattus rattus) in indigenous forests of the North Island, New Zealand. N.Z. J. Ecol. 19:5–17.Google Scholar
  16. Kemble, E. D., and Bolwahnn, B. L. 1997. Immediate and long-term effects of novel odors on risk assessment in mice. Physiol. Behav. 61:543–549.Google Scholar
  17. King, C. M. (ed.). 1990. The Handbook of New Zealand Mammals. Oxford University Press, Auckland, New Zealand, 600 pp.Google Scholar
  18. King, C. M., and Moller, H. 1997. Distribution and response of rats Rattus rattus and R. exulans to seedfall to New Zealand beech forests. Pac. Conserv. Biol. 3:143–155.Google Scholar
  19. Krasnov, B., and Khoklova, I. 1996. Discrimination of midday jird's odour by house mice. Anim. Behav. 52:659–665.Google Scholar
  20. Mappes, T., Koskela, E., and Ylonen, H. 1998. Breeding suppression in voles under predation risk of small mustelids: Laboratory or methodological artifact? Oikos 82:365–369.Google Scholar
  21. Mason, J. R., Epple, G., and Nolte, D. L. 1992. Semiochemicals and improvements in rodent control, pp. 327-346, in B. G. Galef, M. Mainardi, and P. Valsecchi (eds.). Behavioral Aspects of Feeding: Basic and Applied Research in Mammals: 6th Workshop of the International School of Ethology, Ettore Majorana Centre for Scientific Culture, Erice, Sicily, Italy, June 8–14, 1992. Harwood Academic Publishers, Chur, Switzerland, 391 pp.Google Scholar
  22. Nolte, D. L., Mason, J. R., Epple, G., Aronov, E., and Campbell, D. L. 1994. Why are predator urines aversive to prey? J. Chem. Ecol. 20:1505–1516.Google Scholar
  23. Palmer, J. D. 1976. An Introduction to Biological Rhythms. Academic Press, New York, 375 pp.Google Scholar
  24. Perrot-Sinal, T., and Petersen, K. 1997. Exposure to predator odor reduces locomotor activity levels in adult male rats: Lack of effect of hippocampal lesion. J. Chem. Ecol. 23:2175–2186.Google Scholar
  25. Randall, J. A., Hatch, S. M., and Hekkala, E. R. 1995. Inter-specific variation in antipredator behavior in sympatric species of kangaroo rat. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 36:243–250.Google Scholar
  26. Robinson, D. L. 1987. Estimation and use of variance components. Statistician 36:3–14.Google Scholar
  27. Spurr, E. B. 1979. A theoretical assessment of the ability of bird species to recover from an imposed reduction in numbers, with particular reference to 1080 poisoning. N.Z. J. Ecol. 12:23–32.Google Scholar
  28. Spurr, E. B. 1991. Effects of brushtail possum control operations on nontarget bird populations. Acta IOC 20:2534–2545.Google Scholar
  29. Sullivan, T. P., Nordstrom, L. O., and Sullivan, D. S. 1985. Use of predator odors as repellents to reduce feeding damage by herbivores I. snowshoe hares (Lepus americanus). J. Chem. Ecol. 11:903–919.Google Scholar
  30. Taylor, R. H., and Thomas, B. W. 1989. Eradication of Norway rats (Rattus norvegicus) from Hawea Island, Fiordland, using brodifacoum. N.Z. J. Ecol. 12:23–32.Google Scholar
  31. Taylor, R. H., and Thomas, B. W. 1993. Rats eradicated from rugged Breaksea Island (170 ha), Fiordland, New Zealand. Biol. Conserv. 65:191–198.Google Scholar
  32. Tobin, M. E., Engemann, R. M., and Sugihara, R. T. 1995. Effects of mongoose odors on rat capture success. J. Chem. Ecol. 21:635–639.Google Scholar
  33. Wace, N. M. 1986. The rat problem on oceanic islands-research is needed. Oryx 20:79–86.Google Scholar
  34. Ward, J. F., MacDonald, D. W., Doncaster, C. P., and Mauget, C. 1996. Physiological response of the European hedgehog to predator and nonpredator odour. Physiol. Behav. 60:1469–1472.Google Scholar
  35. Wuensch, K. L. 1992. Fostering house mice onto rats and deer mice: Effects on response to species odours. Anim. Learn. Behav. 20:253–258.Google Scholar
  36. Ylonen, H., and Ronkainen, H. 1994. Breeding suppression in the bank vole as an antipredatory adaptation in a predictable environment. Evol. Ecol. 8:658–666.Google Scholar
  37. Zangrossi, H., and File, S. E. 1994. Habituation and generalisation of phobic responses to cat odor. Brain Res. Bull. 33:189–194.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gary N. Bramley
    • 1
  • Joseph R. Waas
    • 1
  • Harold V. Henderson
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Biological SciencesUniversity of WaikatoHamiltonNew Zealand
  2. 2.New Zealand Pastoral Agricultural Research Institute (AgResearch Ruakura)HamiltonNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations