Abstract
The primary goal of ethics consultation should be to provide effective assistance to patients and families in obtaining care that is duly responsive to their rights and their needs. The consultation reported by Mark Bliton fails in this regard because it never ascertains why the consultation was called; makes little attempt to ascertain the motives of those involved; avoids exploration of the ethical concerns of family, attending or staff; makes no connection with institutional policies or practices; uncritically adopts and serves the medical treatment ethos; and substitutes fellowfeeling for compassionate action.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ackerman, T.F. (1989). Conceptualizing the Role of the Ethics Consultant: Some Theoretical Issues. In John C. Fletcher, Norman Quist and Albert R. Jonsen (Eds.). Ethics Consultation in Health Care. Ann Arbor: Health Administration Press.
Bliton, M.J. (1999). Ethics Talk; Talking Ethics: An Example of Clinical Ethics Consultation. Human Studies 22(1): 7–24.
Fletcher J.C. and Siegler, M. (1996). What Are the Goals of Ethics Consultation? A Consensus Statement. The Journal of Clinical Ethics 7(2): 22–26.
Glover, J.J., Ozar, D.T. and Thomasma, D.C. (1986). Teaching Ethics On Rounds: The Ethicist as Teacher, Consultant and Decision-Maker. Theoretical Medicine 7(1): 13–32.
Moreno, J. (1991). Ethics Consultation as Moral Engagement. Bioethics 5(1): 44–56.
Robertson, J.A. (1989). Clinical Medical Ethics and the Law: The Rights and Duties of Ethics Consultants. In John C. Fletcher, Norman Quist and Albert R. Jonsen (Eds.), Ethics Consultation in Health Care. Ann Arbor: Health Administration Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tomlinson, T. Ethics Consultant: Problem Solver or Spiritual Counselor?. Human Studies 22, 43–52 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005408718236
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005408718236