Climatic Change

, Volume 42, Issue 2, pp 351–375 | Cite as

Impact of ENSO-Related Climate Anomalies on Crop Yields in the U.S.

  • David M. Legler
  • Kelly J. Bryant
  • James J. O'Brien


Historical daily thermal and precipitation data from selected stations across the United States are composited into climate scenarios for the three phases of ENSO: Warm Events (El Niño), Cold Events (El Viejo or La Niña), and Neutral. Using these scenarios, yields of 7 field crops were simulated using the EPIC biophysical model during the one-year period coincident with maximum SST anomalies in the equatorial Pacific. The response of simulated agricultural productivity to the ENSO-related climate-variability parameters, is presented. A sensitivity calculation confirms the relevance of precipitation totals/medians and suggests ENSO-related yields are sensitive to changes in statistical properties characterizing precipitation distribution and occurrence. Results are spatially dependent, with the southwest and northern plains regions indicating the highest sensitivity to the inclusion of additional precipitation characteristics. The southeast yields are not as sensitive. The yield deviations (expressed as normalized differences to neutral yields) associated with the two extreme ENSO phases (Warm Events and Cold Events) are spatially and crop dependent with ranges up to ±120%. The largest yield deviations are in the south, southwest, and northern plains. Overall, Cold Events demonstrate larger impacts in the southern regions and Warm Events have a larger impact in the north. Additionally, the notion that climate anomalies associated with Cold and Warm Events and subsequent impacts on yields should be of opposite sign (i.e., linear) is not valid in many regions. For the eastern half of the U.S., modeled yield deviations under Warm Event conditions are nearly all less than neutral. Conversely, in the western half, results are more mixed. Under Cold Event conditions, yields in the east are enhanced in the south, but worsened in the north; while in the western half, yields have decreased in general. The results highlight the critical role of climate and production-related data on station or county levels in quantifying the impact of ENSO climate anomalies on yields. Both the diverse nature of the ENSO-related yield deviations as well as their sensitivity to monthly frequency distribution and occurrence characteristics imply that ENSO-related seasonal precipitation forecasts might be beneficial for agricultural application only if details were provided regarding not only totals, but also predicted changes in temporal and spatial variability of a more comprehensive suite of characteristics.


Cold Event Climate Anomaly Yield Deviation Precipitation Forecast Warm Event 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Adams, R. M., Bryant, K. J., McCarl, B. A., Legler, D. M., O'Brien, J. J., Solow, A., and Weiher, R.: 1995, ‘The Value of Improved Long-Range Weather Information: Southeastern U.S. ENSO Forecasts as They Influence U.S. Agriculture’ Contemp. Econ. Pol. 13, 10-13.Google Scholar
  2. Brenner, J.: 1991, ‘Southern Oscillation Anomalies and their Relationship to Wildfire Activity in Florida’ Intl. J. Wildland Fire 1, 73-78.Google Scholar
  3. Bryant, K. J., Benson, V. W., Kiniry, J. R., Williams, J. R., and Lacewell, R. D.: 1992, ‘Simulating Corn Yield Response to Irrigation Timing: Validation of the EPIC Model’ J. Prod. Agric. 5, 237-242.Google Scholar
  4. Cane, M. A., Eshel, G., and Buckland, R. W.: 1994, ‘Forecasting Zimbabwean Maize Yield Using Eastern Equatorial Pacific Sea Surface Temperature’ Nature 370, 204-205.Google Scholar
  5. Cayan, D. R. and Webb, R. H.: 1992, ‘El Niño/Southern Oscillation and Streamflow in the Western U.S.’ in Diaz, H. F. and Markgraf, V. (eds.), Historical and Pacleoclimatic Aspects of the Southern Oscillation, Cambridge University Press, pp. 29-68.Google Scholar
  6. Chen, D., Zebiak, S. E., Busalacchi, A. J., and Cane, M. A.: 1995, ‘An Improved Procedure for El Niño Forecasting: Implications for Predictability’ Science 269, 1699-1702.Google Scholar
  7. Douglas, A. V. and Englehart, P.: 1981, ‘On a Statistical Relationship between Autumn Rainfall in the Central Equatorial Pacific and Subsequent Winter Precipitation in Florida’ Mon. Wea. Rev. 109, 2377-2382.Google Scholar
  8. Green, P.: 1996, Regional Analysis of Canada, Alaska, and Mexico Precipitation and Temperature for ENSO Impact, COAPS Report 96-6, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL 32306-2840, p. 110.Google Scholar
  9. Green, P. M., Legler, D. M., Miranda V, C. J. M., and O'Brien, J. J.: 1997, The North American Climate Patterns Associated with El Niño-Southern Oscillation, Report 97-1, Center for Ocean-Atmospheric Prediction Studies, Tallahassee, FL 32306-2840, p. 17.Google Scholar
  10. Hansen, J. W., Hodges, A. W., and Jones, J. W.: 1998, ‘ENSO Influences on Agriculture in the Southeastern U.S.’ J. Climate 11, 404-411.Google Scholar
  11. Hughes, P. Y., Mason, E. H., Karl, T. R., and Brower, W. A.: 1992, United States Historical Climatology Network Daily Temperature and Precipitation Data, ORNL/CDIAC-50, NDP-042, Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, p. 133.Google Scholar
  12. Jones, C. S., Shriver, J. F., and O'Brien, J. J.: 1992, The Effects of El Niño on Florida Rainfall and Fire Data, Mesoscale Air-Sea Interaction Group, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL 32306-2840, p. 25.Google Scholar
  13. Kahya, E. and Dracup, J. A.: 1993, ‘U.S. Streamflow Patterns in Relation to the El Niño/Southern Oscillation’ Water Resour. Res. 29, 2491-2503.Google Scholar
  14. Karl, T. R., Williams Jr., C. N., and Quinlan, F. T.: 1990, United States Historical Climatology Network (HCN) Serial Temperature and Precipitation Data, ORNL/CDIAC-30, NDP-019/R1, Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, p. 374.Google Scholar
  15. Keppenne, C. L.: 1995, ‘An ENSO Signal in Soybean Futures Prices’ J. Climate 8, 1685-1689.Google Scholar
  16. Kiladis, G. N. and Diaz, H. F.: 1989, ‘Global Climatic Anomalies Associated with Extremes in the Southern Oscillation’ J. Climate 2, 1069-1090.Google Scholar
  17. Kiniry, J. R., Major, D. J., Izaurralde, R. C., Williams, J. R., Gassman, P. W., Morrison, M., Bergentine, R., and Zentner, R. P.: 1995, ‘EPIC Model Parameters for Cereal, Oilseed, and Forage Crops in the Northern Great Plains Region’ Can. J. Plant Sci. 75, 679-688.Google Scholar
  18. McBride, J. L. and Nicholls, N.: 1983, ‘Seasonal Relationships between Australian Rainfall and the Southern Oscillation’ Mon. Wea. Rev. 111, 1998-2004.Google Scholar
  19. Mearns, R. O., Rosenzweig, C., and Goldberg, R.: 1996, ‘The Effect of Changes in Daily and Interannual Climatic Variability on CERES-Wheat: A Sensitivity Study’ Clim. Change 32, 257-292.Google Scholar
  20. Mullan, A. B.: 1995, ‘On the Linearity and Stability of Southern Oscillation-Climate Relationships for New Zealand’ Int. J. Climatol. 15, 1365-1386.Google Scholar
  21. Nonhebel, S.: 1993, ‘The Effects of Use of Average Instead of Daily Weather Data in Crop Growth Simulation Models’ Clim. Change 44, 377-396.Google Scholar
  22. Phillips, J. G., Rosenzweig, C., and Cane, M.: 1996, ‘Exploring the Potential for Using ENSO Forecasts in the U.S. Corn Belt’ Int. Drought Newsl. 8, 6-10.Google Scholar
  23. Riha, S. J., Wilks, W., and Simoens, P.: 1996, ‘Impact of Temperature and Precipitation Variability on Crop Model Predictions’ Clim. Change 32, 293-311.Google Scholar
  24. Ropelewski, C. F. and Halpert, M. S.: 1986, ‘North American Precipitation and Temperature Patterns Associated with the El Niño Southern Oscillation (ENSO)’ Mon. Wea. Rev. 114, 2352-2362.Google Scholar
  25. Ropelewski, C. F. and Halpert, M. S.: 1987, ‘Global and Regional Scale Precipitation Patterns Associated with El Niño/Southern Oscillation’ Mon. Wea. Rev. 115, 1606-1626.Google Scholar
  26. Ropelewski, C. F. and Halpert, M. S.: 1996, ‘Quantifying Southern Oscillation-Precipitation Relationships’ J. Climate 9, 1043-1059.Google Scholar
  27. Rosenberg, N. J., Izaurralde, R. C., Tiscareno-Lopez, M., Legler, D., Srinivasan, R., Brown, R. A., and Sands, R. D.: 1997, Sensitivity of North American Agriculture to ENSO-Based Climate Scenarios and their Socio-Economic Consequences: Modeling in an Integrated Assessment Framework, PNL-11699/UC-0000, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Washington, D.C., p. 146.Google Scholar
  28. Semenov, M. A. and Porter, J. R.: 1995, ‘Climatic Variability and Modelling of Crop Yields’ Agric. For. Meteorol. 73, 265-283.Google Scholar
  29. Sittel, M.: 1994, Differences in the Means of ENSO Extremes for Maximum Temperature and Precipitation in the United States, COAPS Report 94-2, Florida State University, COAPS, Tallahassee, FL 32306-2840, p. 76.Google Scholar
  30. Solow, A., Adams, R. M., Bryant, K. J., Legler, D. M., O'Brien, J. J., McCarl, B. A., Nayda, W., and Weiher, R.: 1998, ‘The Value of Improved ENSO Prediction to U.S. Agriculture’ Clim. Change 39, 47-60.Google Scholar
  31. Steiner, J. L., Williams, J. R., and Jones, O. R.: 1987, ‘Evaluation of EPIC Using a Dryland Wheat-Sorghum-Fallow Crop Rotation’ Agron. J. 79, 732-738.Google Scholar
  32. Sweetnam, T. W. and Betancourt, J.: 1990, ‘Fire-Southern Oscillation Relations in the Southwestern United States’ Science 249, 1017-1020.Google Scholar
  33. Williams, J. R., Jones, C. A., and Dyke, P. T.: 1984, ‘A Modeling Approach to Determining the Relationship between Erosion and Soil Productivity’ Trans. ASAE 27, 129-144.Google Scholar
  34. Williams, J. R., Jones, C. A., Kiniry, J. R., and Spanel, D. A.: 1989, ‘The EPIC Crop Growth Model’ Trans. ASAE 32, 497-511.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • David M. Legler
    • 1
  • Kelly J. Bryant
    • 2
  • James J. O'Brien
    • 1
  1. 1.Center for Ocean Atmospheric Prediction StudiesFlorida State UniversityTallahasseeU.S.A.
  2. 2.Southeast Research and Extension CenterUniversity of ArkansasU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations