Abstract
Kaplan (1977) proposes a neo-Fregean theory of demonstratives which, despite its departure from a certain problematic Fregean thesis, I argue, ultimately founders on account of its failure to give up the Fregean desideratum of a semantic theory that it provide an account of cognitive significance. I explain why Kaplan's (1989) afterthoughts don't remedy this defect. Finally, I sketch an alternative nonsolipsistic picture of demonstrative reference which idealizes away from an agent's narrowly characterizable psychological state, and instead relies on the robust multiply realizable relation between the skilled agent and demonstrated object.
When the unclean spirit has gone out of a person, it wanders through waterless regions looking for a resting place, but it finds none. Then it says, 'I will return to my house from which I came.' When it comes, it finds it empty, swept, and put in order. Then it goes and brings along seven other spirits more evil than itself, and they enter and live there; and the last state of that person is worse than the first. So will it be also with this evil generation.
– attributed to Jesus (Matthew 12:43-45, New Revised Standard Version of the Bible)
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Ackerman, F.: 1989, 'Content, Character, and Nondescriptive Meaning', in Almog et al. (eds.), pp. 1-21.
Almog, J., J. Perry, and H. Wettstein (eds.): 1989, Themes from Kaplan, Oxford University Press, New York.
Burge, T.: 1979, 'Individualism and the Mental', in P. A. French, T. E. Uehling, and H. K. Wettstein (eds.), Midwest Studies in Philosophy, vol. 4, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, pp. 73-121.
Burge, T.: 1982, 'Other bodies', in A. Woodfield (ed.), Thought and Object: Essays on Intentionality, Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 97-120.
Donnellan, K.: 1966, 'Reference and Definite Descriptions', Philosophical Review 75, 281-304.
Fodor, J.: 1987, Psychosemantics, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Frege, G.: 1892a, 'On Sense and Nominatum', from H. Feigl and W. Sellars (eds.): 1949, Readings in Philosophical Analysis, Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York, pp. 85-102. (Trans. H. Feigl).
Frege, G.: 1892b, 'On Concept and Object', reprinted in P. Geach and M. Black (eds.), 1980, Translations from the Philosophical Writings of Gottlob Frege, 3rd ed., Rownman & Littlefield, Totowa, New Jersey.
Kaplan, D.: 1968, 'Quantifying In', Synthese 19, 178-214. (My pagination corresponds to the reprint in A. P. Martinich (ed.), 1990, Philosophy of Language, 2nd ed., Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 370-391.)
Kaplan, D.: 1977, 'Demonstratives', in Almog et al. (eds.), pp. 481-563.
Kaplan, D.: 1989, 'Afterthoughts', in Almog et al. (eds.), pp. 565-614.
Kripke, S.: 1977, 'Speaker's Reference and Semantic Reference', in P. A. French, T. E. Uehling, and H. K. Wettstein (eds.), Contemporary Perspectives in the Philosophy of Language, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, pp. 6-27.
Lewis, D.: 1983, 'Attitudes De Dicto and De Se', Philosophical Papers, vol. 1, Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 133-159.
McClamrock, R.: 1995, Existential Cognition, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Perry, J.: 1977, 'Frege on Demonstratives', Philosophical Review 86, 474-497.
Stalnaker, R.: 1978, 'Assertion', in P. Cole (ed.), Syntax and Semantics 9: Pragmatics, Academic Press, New York, pp. 315-332.
Stalnaker, R.: 1989, 'On What's in the Head', in J. Tomberlin (ed.), Philosophical Perspectives 3: Philosophy of Mind and Action Theory, pp. 287-316.
Taschek, W.W.: 1987, 'Content, character, and cognitive significance',Philosophical Studies 52, 161-189.
Wettstein, H.: 1986, 'Has Semantics Rested on a Mistake?', Journal of Philosophy 83, 185-209.
Wittgenstein, L.: 1953, Philosophical Investigations, Macmillan, New York.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lalor, B. Rethinking Kaplan's ''afterthoughts'' About 'That': An Exorcism of Semantical Demons. Erkenntnis 47, 67–87 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005365918489
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005365918489