Skip to main content

Structural and Process History of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change

Abstract

In the nine years since its establishment in 1988, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has attempted to walk the tightrope of being scientifically sound and politically acceptable. This paper investigates how the IPCC has evolved over two assessment cycles. It provides an in-depth examination of important characteristics of the IPCC process including the peer review mechanism, participation of developing countries, and its interactions with the intergovernmental negotiation process on climate change.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  • Acosta-Moreno, R.: 1997, Interview with Author, Bonn, Germany, 4 March.

  • Agrawala, S.: 1998, ‘Context and Early Origins of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’, Clim. Change 39, 605-620.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bodansky, D.: 1994. ‘Prologue to the Climate Change Convention’, in Mintzer, I. and Leonard, J. A. (eds.), Negotiating Climate Change: The Inside Story of the Rio Convention, Cambridge University Press, pp. 45-74.

  • Boehmer-Christiansen, S.: 1994a, ‘Global Climate Protection Policy: The Limits of Scientific Advice, Part 1’, Glob. Environ. Change, 4(2), 140-159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boehmer-Christiansen, S.: 1994b, ‘Global Climate Protection Policy: The Limits of Scientific Advice, Part 2’, Glob. Environ. Change, 4(3), 185-200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boehmer-Christiansen, S. and Skea, J. F.: 1994c, ‘The Operation and Impact of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change: Results of a Survey of Participants and Users’, Governing Our Environment, Copenhagen, Denmark, 16-18 November.

  • Bolin, B.: 1997, Interview with Author, Stockholm, Sweden, 6 March.

  • Borione, D. and Ripert, J.: 1994, ‘Exercising Common but Differentiated Responsibility’, in Mintzer, I. and Leonard, J. A. (eds.), Negotiating Climate Change: The Inside Story of the Rio Convention, Cambridge University Press, pp. 77-96.

  • Brenton, T.: 1994, The Greening of Machiavelli: The Evolution of International Environmental Politics, Earthscan Publications, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Estrada-Oyela, R.: 1993, Letter to IPCC Chairman Bert Bolin, INC, Geneva, 13 March.

  • Estrada-Oyela, R.: 1994, Speech at Royal Geographic Society, London, 31 May.

  • Fitzgerald, J.: 1990, ‘The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change: Taking the First Steps Towards a Global Response’, Southern Illinois Law Journal 14, 231-254.

    Google Scholar 

  • IPCC: 1988, WMO/UNEP Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change: Report of the First Session, WCP TD-No. 267, Geneva, 9-11 November.

  • IPCC: 1989, WMO/UNEP Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change: Report of the First Session of the IPCC Bureau, WCP TD-No. 294, Geneva, 6-7 February.

  • IPCC: 1990a, Policymaker Summary of the IPCC Special Committee on the Participation of Developing Countries, IPCC, August.

  • IPCC: 1990b, WMO/UNEP Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change: Report of the Second Session of the IPCC Bureau.

  • IPCC: 1991, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change: Report of the Fourth Session of the IPCC Bureau.

  • IPCC: 1992, Report of the Eighth Session of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Harare, Zimbabwe, November.

  • IPCC: 1993, Report of the Ninth Session of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Geneva, Switzerland, August.

  • Jäger, J. (ed.): 1988, Developing Policies for Responding to Climatic Change, WCIP-1, WMO/TD No. 225, World Meteorological Organization, Geneva.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jefferson, M.: 1996, Climate Change 1995: The IPCC Second Assessment Reviewed, Report No. 5, World Energy Council, London, March.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linden, H.: 1993, ‘A Dissenting View on Global Climate Change’, Electricity Journal, July.

  • Lindzen, R.: 1992, The Origin of Alleged Scientific Consensus, Proceedings of the OPEC Seminar on the Environment, Vienna, April 13-15.

  • Meyer, A. and Cooper, T.: 1995, ‘A Recalculation of the Social Costs of Climate Change’, Occasional Paper, Global Commons Institute London, July.

  • Moss, R.: 1994, ‘Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’, Human Dimensions Quarterly 1(2).

  • Nakicenovic, N.: 1997, Discussion with Harvard Global Environmental Assessment Fellows, IIASA, Laxenburg, Austria, 24 January.

    Google Scholar 

  • Obasi, G. O. P.: 1988. Letter to WMO Member Governments, WMO, Geneva, 25 March.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, D. W., Cline, W. R. et al.: 1995, The Social Costs of Climate Change: Greenhouse Damage and the Benefits of Control, June 1995 Draft Chapter for IPCC Working Group III Second Assessment Report.

  • Ripert, J.: 1997, Interview with Author, Paris, France, 14 March.

  • Schneider, S.: 1991, ‘Three Reports of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’, Environment 33(1), 25-30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, S. F.: 1996. ‘A Preliminary Critique of IPCC’s Second Assessment of Climate Change’, The Global Warming Debate: The Report of the European Science and Environment Forum, ESEF, London, pp. 146-156.

    Google Scholar 

  • The New Scientist: 1994, ‘Frankenstein Syndrome Hits Climate Treaty’, The New Scientist, 11 June.

  • UNGA: 1989, Protection of Global Climate for Present and Future Generations of Mankind, Resolution 43/53 adopted by the United Nations General Assembly, New York City, 27 January.

    Google Scholar 

  • Usher, P.: 1997, Interview with Author, Bonn, Germany, 4 March.

  • Watson, R. T.: 1997, White Paper on the Third Assessment Report of the IPCC, IPCC, Washington, D.C., 28 May.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wirth, T.: 1997, Comments at Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, 10 April.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Agrawala, S. Structural and Process History of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Climatic Change 39, 621–642 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005312331477

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005312331477

Keywords

  • Climate Change
  • Intergovernmental Panel
  • Negotiation Process
  • Review Mechanism
  • Intergovernmental Negotiation