Abstract
The energetics controversy is understood variously as energy vs. atoms, thermodynamics vs. statistical mechanics, phenomenalism vs. realism, equations vs. pictures, and especially Ostwald vs. Boltzmann. It is generally thought that at Lübeck in 1895 Boltzmann and Planck demolished energetics, but while its momentum was slowed, energetics in one or more of the above senses still retained supporters as late as the great physics conference at the St. Louis World’s Fair in 1904. Indeed, after Ostwald himself abandoned it in 1908, Ernst Mach began for the first time to defend it. The main emphasis in this paper, however, is on Georg Helm (1851–1923) who had been invited to Lübeck to be the main speaker on energetics. He had adopted his position earlier than Ostwald and his views avoided many of the errors and oversights in Ostwald’s approach. Indeed, Helm could be called the strongest defender of energetics, even if Ostwald was Boltzmann’s main target. Helm was largely Machist in philosophy at that time and did not reify energy.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
REFERENCES
Verhandlungen der Gesellschaft deutscher Naturforscher und Ärzte, 67. Versammlung zu Lübeck, 16-20 September 1895 (F. C. W. Vogel: Leipzig, 1895-1896). As was common by 1895, the Lübeck Verhandlungen are divided as follows: Erster Theil: Die aligemeinen Sitzungen; Zweiter Theil, I. Hälfte: Naturwissenschaftlichen Abtheilungen; Zweiter Theil. II. Hälfte: Medicinische Abtheilungen. Both parts were published as a single volume, which in this article will often be cited as Lübecker Verhandlungen.As for Conferences of the society during other years and in other cities, they will be cited under the first title above.
Deltete, Robert J.: 1983, The Energetics Controversy in Late Nineteenth Century Germany: Helm, Ostwald, and their Critics, Yale University doctoral dissertation, 2 volumes, UMI, Ann Arbor.
Gibbs and Ostwald: 1996, 'A Contrast in Scientific Style', Journal of Chemical Education 73(4), 289-295.
Helm and Boltzmann: 1996, 'Gibbs and the Energeticists', in A. J. Kox and D. Siegel (eds.), No Truth Except in the Details: Essays in Honor of Martin J. Klein,Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht, pp. 135-169.
Körber, Hans Günther (ed.): I. 1961 & II. 1969, Aus dem wissenschaftlichcn Brieftwechsel Wilhelm Ostwalds, Akademie Verlag: Berlin.
Curd, M. V.: 1978, Ludwig Boltzmann's Philosophy of Science: Theories, Pictures, and Analogies, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Pittsburgh.
Dugas, René: 1959, La Théorie physique an sens de Boltzmann et ses prolongement modernes, Griffon: Neuchâtel.
Duhem, P.: 1894, 'Les principles fondamentaux de l'énergetique et leur application aux phénomènes chimique', Journal de Physique 3, 289-307, 352-371.
Helm, G.: 1887, Die Lehre von der Energie, historisch-kritisch entwickelt, A. Felix: Leipzig.
Helm, G.: 1895a, 'Ñberblick über der derzeitigen Zustand der Energetik', Beilage zu den Annalen der Physik 55, III-XVIII.
Helm, G.: 1895b, 'DeÑber den derzeitigcn Zustand der Energetik', Verhandlungen der Gesellschaft deutscher Naturforscher und Ärzte,Leipzig,67, II, 1, 28-33.
Helm, G.: 1898, Die Energetik nach ihrer geschichitlichen Entwicklung, Veit: Leipzig.
Hertz, Heinrich: 1894, Die Principien der Mechanik in neuem Zusammenhang dargestellt, edited by P. Lenard, Barth: Leipzig.
Hiebert, Erwin: 1968, The Conception of Thermodynamics in the Scientific Thought of Mach and Planck, Ernst-Mach-Institut: Freiburg im Breisgau.
Hiebert, E. N.: 1971, 'The Energetics Controversy and the New Thermodynamics', in D. H. D. Roller (ed.), Perspectives in the History of Science and Technology, University of Oklahoma Press, Norman.
Lasswitz, K.: 1893, 'Die moderne Energetik in ihrer Bedeutung für die Erkenntnislehre', Philosophische Monatsheft 29, 1-30.
McCormmach, R.: 1974, 'On Academic Scientists in Wilhelminian Germany', Daedalus 193, 57-172.
Meyer, V.: 'Problem der Atomistik', 1895, Verhandlungen der Gesellschaft deutscher Naturforscher und Ärzte, 67, II, 1, 95-110.
Ostwald, W.: 1895, A review of Helm's paper: 'Ñberblick über der derzeitigen Zustand der Energetik', in Zeitschrift für physikalische Chemie 18, 186.
Ostwald, W.: 1926-1927, Lebenslinien: Eine Selbstbiographic, 3 volumes, Klasing: Berlin.
Planck, M.: 1948, Wissenschaftliche Selbstbiographie, Barth, Leipzig.
Sommerfeld, A.: 1944, 'Das Werk Boltzmanns', Wiener Chemiker Zeitung 47, 25.
Wien, W.: 1890, 'Die gegenwärtige Lage der Energielehre', in Verhandlungen der Gesell-schaft deutscher Naturforscher und Ärzte, Leipzig, Pt. 2, pp. 45-49.
Wislicenus, Johannes: 1893, Die Chemie und das problem von der Materie, Engelmann: Leipzig, 1893.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Deltete, R. Helm and Boltzmann: Energetics at the Lübeck Naturforscherversammlung. Synthese 119, 45–68 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005287003138
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005287003138