Skip to main content
Log in

Helm and Boltzmann: Energetics at the Lübeck Naturforscherversammlung

  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The energetics controversy is understood variously as energy vs. atoms, thermodynamics vs. statistical mechanics, phenomenalism vs. realism, equations vs. pictures, and especially Ostwald vs. Boltzmann. It is generally thought that at Lübeck in 1895 Boltzmann and Planck demolished energetics, but while its momentum was slowed, energetics in one or more of the above senses still retained supporters as late as the great physics conference at the St. Louis World’s Fair in 1904. Indeed, after Ostwald himself abandoned it in 1908, Ernst Mach began for the first time to defend it. The main emphasis in this paper, however, is on Georg Helm (1851–1923) who had been invited to Lübeck to be the main speaker on energetics. He had adopted his position earlier than Ostwald and his views avoided many of the errors and oversights in Ostwald’s approach. Indeed, Helm could be called the strongest defender of energetics, even if Ostwald was Boltzmann’s main target. Helm was largely Machist in philosophy at that time and did not reify energy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Verhandlungen der Gesellschaft deutscher Naturforscher und Ärzte, 67. Versammlung zu Lübeck, 16-20 September 1895 (F. C. W. Vogel: Leipzig, 1895-1896). As was common by 1895, the Lübeck Verhandlungen are divided as follows: Erster Theil: Die aligemeinen Sitzungen; Zweiter Theil, I. Hälfte: Naturwissenschaftlichen Abtheilungen; Zweiter Theil. II. Hälfte: Medicinische Abtheilungen. Both parts were published as a single volume, which in this article will often be cited as Lübecker Verhandlungen.As for Conferences of the society during other years and in other cities, they will be cited under the first title above.

  • Deltete, Robert J.: 1983, The Energetics Controversy in Late Nineteenth Century Germany: Helm, Ostwald, and their Critics, Yale University doctoral dissertation, 2 volumes, UMI, Ann Arbor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs and Ostwald: 1996, 'A Contrast in Scientific Style', Journal of Chemical Education 73(4), 289-295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helm and Boltzmann: 1996, 'Gibbs and the Energeticists', in A. J. Kox and D. Siegel (eds.), No Truth Except in the Details: Essays in Honor of Martin J. Klein,Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht, pp. 135-169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Körber, Hans Günther (ed.): I. 1961 & II. 1969, Aus dem wissenschaftlichcn Brieftwechsel Wilhelm Ostwalds, Akademie Verlag: Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curd, M. V.: 1978, Ludwig Boltzmann's Philosophy of Science: Theories, Pictures, and Analogies, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Pittsburgh.

  • Dugas, René: 1959, La Théorie physique an sens de Boltzmann et ses prolongement modernes, Griffon: Neuchâtel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duhem, P.: 1894, 'Les principles fondamentaux de l'énergetique et leur application aux phénomènes chimique', Journal de Physique 3, 289-307, 352-371.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helm, G.: 1887, Die Lehre von der Energie, historisch-kritisch entwickelt, A. Felix: Leipzig.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helm, G.: 1895a, 'Ñberblick über der derzeitigen Zustand der Energetik', Beilage zu den Annalen der Physik 55, III-XVIII.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helm, G.: 1895b, 'DeÑber den derzeitigcn Zustand der Energetik', Verhandlungen der Gesellschaft deutscher Naturforscher und Ärzte,Leipzig,67, II, 1, 28-33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helm, G.: 1898, Die Energetik nach ihrer geschichitlichen Entwicklung, Veit: Leipzig.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hertz, Heinrich: 1894, Die Principien der Mechanik in neuem Zusammenhang dargestellt, edited by P. Lenard, Barth: Leipzig.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hiebert, Erwin: 1968, The Conception of Thermodynamics in the Scientific Thought of Mach and Planck, Ernst-Mach-Institut: Freiburg im Breisgau.

  • Hiebert, E. N.: 1971, 'The Energetics Controversy and the New Thermodynamics', in D. H. D. Roller (ed.), Perspectives in the History of Science and Technology, University of Oklahoma Press, Norman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasswitz, K.: 1893, 'Die moderne Energetik in ihrer Bedeutung für die Erkenntnislehre', Philosophische Monatsheft 29, 1-30.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCormmach, R.: 1974, 'On Academic Scientists in Wilhelminian Germany', Daedalus 193, 57-172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, V.: 'Problem der Atomistik', 1895, Verhandlungen der Gesellschaft deutscher Naturforscher und Ärzte, 67, II, 1, 95-110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostwald, W.: 1895, A review of Helm's paper: 'Ñberblick über der derzeitigen Zustand der Energetik', in Zeitschrift für physikalische Chemie 18, 186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostwald, W.: 1926-1927, Lebenslinien: Eine Selbstbiographic, 3 volumes, Klasing: Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Planck, M.: 1948, Wissenschaftliche Selbstbiographie, Barth, Leipzig.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sommerfeld, A.: 1944, 'Das Werk Boltzmanns', Wiener Chemiker Zeitung 47, 25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wien, W.: 1890, 'Die gegenwärtige Lage der Energielehre', in Verhandlungen der Gesell-schaft deutscher Naturforscher und Ärzte, Leipzig, Pt. 2, pp. 45-49.

  • Wislicenus, Johannes: 1893, Die Chemie und das problem von der Materie, Engelmann: Leipzig, 1893.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Deltete, R. Helm and Boltzmann: Energetics at the Lübeck Naturforscherversammlung. Synthese 119, 45–68 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005287003138

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005287003138

Keywords

Navigation