Skip to main content
Log in

Truth, Sentential Non-Compositionalit, and Ontology

  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The paper attempts to clarify some fundamental aspects of an explanationof the concept of truth which is neither “deflationary” nor “substantive”.The main aspect examined in detail concerns the ontological dimension of truth, the mind/language-world connection traditionally associated with the concept of truth. It is claimed that it does not make sense to defend or reject a relatedness of truth to the ontological dimension so long as the kind of presupposed or envisaged ontology is not made explicit and critically examined. In particular, it is shown that generally an “objectual” ontology is – often only implicitly – presupposed, i.e., an ontology admitting “objects” (substances), properties, relations, sometimes also facts, events, and the like. The paper demonstrates that such an ontology derives from the Principle of Semantic Sentential Compositionality and that this principle should be rejected. It introduces instead the Principle of Semantic Sentential Contextuality (or Context Principle) as the semantic basis of a new ontology, an ontology of “primary states of affairs”. After sketching such an ontology, it is shown that the relatedness of truth to the ontological dimension becomes intelligible.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Armstrong, D. M.: 1997, A World of States of Affairs, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, T.: 1991'The Identity Theory of Truth’ Mind 100, 35-52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barwise, J. and J. Perry: 1981'Semantic Innocence and Uncompromising Situations’ Midwest Studies in Philosophy VI, 387-403.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandom, R. B.: 1994, Making It Explicit. Reasoning, Representing, and Discursive Commitment, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, K.: 1990, Abstract Particulars, Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Candlish, S.: 1989'The Truth About F. H. Bradley’ Mind 98, 331-48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodd, J.: 1995'Mcdowell and Identity Theories of Truth’ Analysis 55(3), 160-5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodd, J.: 1999'Farewell to States of Affairs’ Australasian Journal of Philosophy 7, 146-60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodd, J. and J. Hornsby: 1992'The Identity Theory of Truth: Reply to Baldwin’ Mind 101, 319-22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dummett, M.: 1978, Truth and Other Enigmas, Harvard University Press, Cambridge,MA. Second printing, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dummett, M.: 1991, Frege, Philosophy of Mathematics, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Earman, J.: 1989, World Enough and Space-Time: Absolute versus Relational Theories of Space and Time, The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Findlay, J. N.: 1963, Meinong's Theory of Objects and Values, 2nd ed., Clarendon Press, Oxford. (1st edn 1933).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitch, F. B.: 1971'Propositions as the Only Realities’ American Philosophical Quarterly 8, 99-103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frege, G.: (1884) 1953, The Foundations of Arithmetic [Die Grundlagen der Arithmetik, 1884], transl. by J. L. Austin, 2nd edn, Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frege, G.: 1967'The Thought’ in P. F. Strawson (ed.), Philosophical Logic, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 17-38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garcia-Carpinetero, M. and M. P. Ontero: 1998'Davidson, Correspondence Truth and the Frege-Gödel-Church Argument’ History and Philosophy of Logic 19, 63-81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greimann, D.: 1999, Freges Theorie der Wahrheit'Habilitationsschrift' University of Munich, Munich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halbach, V.: 1996, Axiomatische Wahrheitstheorien, Akademie Verlag, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heck, Jr., R. G.: 1997'Tarski, Truth, and Semantics’ The Philosophical Review 106, 533-554.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hintikka, J.: (this issue) ‘Post-Tarskian Truth'.

  • Hintikka, J. and G. Sandu: 1999'Tarski's Guilty Secret: Compositionality’ in J. Vole´nski and E. Köhler (eds), Alfred Tarski and the Vienna Circle. Austro-Polish Connections in Logical Empiricism, Vienna Circle Institute Yearbook [1998], vol 6, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 217-230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horwich, P.: [1990] 1998, Truth, 2nd edn, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janssen, T. M. V.: 1997'Compositionality’ in J. van Benthem and A. ter Meulen (eds), Handbook of Logic and Language, Elsevier/The MIT Press, Amsterdam/Cambridge, MA, 417-473.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemp, G.: 1995'Truth in Frege's “Laws of Truth”’ Synthese 105, 31-51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemp, G.: 1998'Meaning and Truth-Conditions’ The Philosophical Quarterly 48, 483-493.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDowell, J.: 1996, Mind and World. With a New Introduction, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA. 1st edn 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, K. J.: 1994'The “Context Principle” in the LaterWittgenstein’ The Philosophical Quarterly 44, 294-310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neale, S.: 1995'The Philosophical Significance of Gödel's Slingshot’ Mind 104, 761-825.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neale, S. and J. Dever: 1997'Slingshots and Boomerangs’ Mind 105, 153-168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oppy, G.: 1997'The Philosophical Insignificance of Gödel's Slingshot’ Mind 106, 121-141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pelletier, F. J.: 1994'The Principle of Semantic Compositionality’ TOPOI 13, 11-24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Puntel, L. B.: 1990, Grundlagen einer Theorie der Wahrheit, de Gruyter, Berlin/New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Puntel, L. B.: 1993'The Context Principle, Universals and Primary States of Affairs’ American Philosophical Quarterly 30, 123-135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Puntel, L. B.: 1997a'Metaphysikkritik bei Carnap und Heidegger: Analyse, Vergleich, Kritik’ LOGOS 4, 194-332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Puntel, L. B.: 1997b ‘Ontologische Kategorien: die Frage nach dem Ansatz’ in G. Meggle (ed.), α υαλύ\(v`\)ωμ\(\varepsilon\)υAnalyomen 2. Proceedings of the 2nd ConferencePerspectives in Analytical Philosophy, vol. II: Philosophy of Language and Metaphysics, Perspectives in Analytical Philosophy, edited by G. Meggle and J. Nida-Rümelin, Vol. 17, de Gruyter, Berlin/New York, 405-412.

    Google Scholar 

  • Puntel, L. B.: 1998 ‘Is Truth Ideal Coherence?’ in A. Wüstehube and M. Quante (eds), Pragmatic Idealism. Critical Essays on Nicholas Rescher's System of Pragmatic Idealism, Poznán Studies in the Philosophy of Sciences and the Humanities, vol. 64, Rodopi, Amsterdam/Atlanta, GA, pp. 146-173

    Google Scholar 

  • Puntel, L. B.: 1999 ‘On the Logical Positivists' Theory of Truth: The Fundamental Problem and a New Perspective’ Journal for General Philosophy of Science 30, 101-130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Puntel, L. B.: forthcoming a ‘Do We Need an Ontology? If So, Which One?’ Ms. 1-34.

  • Puntel, L. B.: forthcoming b ‘The “Identity Theory of Truth”: Semantic and Ontological (Metaphysical) Aspects’ Ms. To appear in Analyomen III. Proceedings of the 3rd Conference “Rationality, Realism, Revision” of the Gesellschaft für analytische Philosophie, Munich, September 1997.

  • Puntel, L. B.: forthcoming c ‘Truth: A Prolegomenon to a General Theory'.

  • Puntel, L. B.: forthcoming d ‘What Does “... Is True” Express?’ to appear in Analytic Philosophy and Logic, vol. 6 of the Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy, Boston 1998.

  • Quine, W. V. O.: 1960, Word and Object, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quine, W. V. O.: 1970, Philosophy of Logic, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quine, W. V. O.: 1981, Theories and Things, The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quine, W. V. O.: 1985'Events and Reification’ in E. LePore and B. P. McLaughlin (eds), Actions and Events, Perspectives on the Philosophy of Donald Davidson, Blackwell, Oxford, 162-71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quine, W. V. O.: 1987, Quiddities. An Intermittently Philosophical Dictionary, The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez-Pereyra, G.: 1998'Searle's Correspondence Theory of Truth and the Slingshot’ The Philosophical Quarterly 48, 513-22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rundle, B.: 1990, Wittgenstein and Contemporary Philosophy of Language, Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rynasiewicz, R.: 1996'Absolute versus Relational Space-Time: An Outmoded Debate?’ The Journal of Philosophy XCIII, 279-306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Searle, J.: 1996, The Construction of Social Reality, Penguin, Harmondsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soames, S.: 1987a'Direct Reference, Propositional Attitudes, and Semantic Content’ Philosophical Topics 15, 47-87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soames, S.: 1987b'Substitutivity’ in J. J. Thomson (ed.), On Being and Saying. Essays for Richard Cartwright, The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 99-132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarski, A.: 1969'Truth and Proof’ The Scientific American 220, 63-77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarski.: 1983'The Concept of Truth in Formalized Languages’ (1933/1935), in A. Tarski, Logic, Semantics, Metamathematics. Papers from 1923 to 1938, translated by J. H. Woodger. 2nd edn, edited and introduced by J. Corcoran, Hackett, Indianapolis, IN, 152-278. (The Polish original appeared in print in 1933, a German translation appeared in 1935.)

  • Teller, P.: 1991'Substance, Relations, and Arguments about the Nature of Space and Time’ Philosophical Review C, 363-396.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L.: Tractatus, Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. The German text of Logischphilosophische Abhandlung with an English translation by C. K. Ogden, London, Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1922, with an introduction by B. Russell, sixth impression 1955.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Puntel, L.B. Truth, Sentential Non-Compositionalit, and Ontology. Synthese 126, 221–259 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005283218810

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005283218810

Keywords

Navigation