Skip to main content
Log in

How Innocent Is Deflationism?

  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

REFERENCES

  • Ayer, A.: 1952, Language, Truth and Logic, Dover, New York. reprint of the second edition 1946.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belnap, N. and A. Gupta: 1993, The Revision Theory of Truth, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cantini, A.: 1990, ‘A Theory of Truth Formally Equivalent to ID1’ Journal of Symbolic Logic 55, 244–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Church, A.: 1950, ‘On Carnaps Analysis of Statements of Assertion and Belief’ Analysis 10, 97–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, D.: 1984, Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Etchemendy, J.: 1988, ‘Tarski on Truth and Logical Consequence’ Journal of Symbolic Logic 53, 51–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feferman, S.: 1991, ‘Reflecting on Incompleteness’ Journal of Symbolic Logic 56, 1–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Field, H.: 1986, ‘The Deflationary Conception of Truth’ in G. MacDonald and C. Wright (eds), Fact, Science and Morality, Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 55–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Field, H.: 1994a, ‘Deflationist Views of Meaning and Content’ Mind 103, 247–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Field, H.: 1994b, ‘Disquotational Truth and Factually Defective Discourse’ The Philosophical Review 103, 405–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Field, H.: 1999, ‘Deflating the Conservativeness Argument, Journal of Philosophy 96, 533–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • García-Carpintero, M.: 1997, ‘On an Incorrect Understanding of Tarskian Truth Definitions’ in Villanueva (ed.), Truth, Vol. 8 of Philosophical Issues, Ridgeview, Atascadero, pp. 45–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grover, D., J. Camp, and N. Belnap: 1975, ‘A Prosentential Theory of Truth’ Philosophical Studies 27, 73–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, A.: 1978, ‘Modal Logic and Truth’ Journal of Philosophical Logic 7, 441–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, A.: 1993, ‘A Critique of Deflationism’ Philosophical Topics 21, 57–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halbach, V.: 1996, Axiomatische Wahrheitstheorien, Akademie Verlag, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halbach, V.: 1999a, Conservative Theories of Classical Truth, Studia Logica 62, 353–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halbach, V.: 1999b, ‘Disquotationalism and Infinite Conjunctions’ Mind 108, 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halbach, V.: 1999c, ‘Disquotationalism Fortified’ in A. Chapuis and A. Gupta (eds), Circularity, Definitions, and Truth, Indian Council of Philosophical Research, to appear.

  • Halbach, V.: n.d., ‘Modalized Disquotationalism’ to appear.

  • Horsten, L.: 1995, ‘The Semantical Paradoxes, the Neutrality of Truth and the Neutrality of the Minimalist Theory of Truth’ in P. Cortois (ed.), The Many Problems of Realism, Vol. 3 of Studies in the General Philosophy of Science, Tilburg University Press, Tilburg, pp. 173–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horwich, P.: 1990, Truth, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaye, R.: 1991, Models of Peano Arithmetic, Oxford Logic Guides, Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ketland, J.: 1999, ‘Deflationism and Tarskis Paradise’ Mind 108, 69–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkham, R.: 1992, Theories of Truth: A Critical Introduction, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotlarski, H., S. Krajewski, and A. Lachlan: 1981, ‘Construction of Satisfaction Classes for Nonstandard Models’ Canadian Mathematical Bulletin 24, 283–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lachlan, A.: 1981, ‘Full Satisfaction Classes and Recursive Saturation’ Canadian Mathematical Bulletin 24, 295–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewy, C.: 1947, ‘Truth and Significance’ Analysis 8, 24–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pap, A.: 1954, ‘Propositions, Sentences, and the Semantic Definition of Truth’ Theoria XX, 23–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pap, A.: 1955, Analytische Erkenntnistheorie, Springer, Wien.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, C.: 1983, Mathematics in Philosophy, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, Chapter Sets and Classes, pp. 209–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, H.: 1994, ‘A Comparison of Something with Something Else’ Words and Life, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 330–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quine, W. O. V.: 1956, ‘Quantifiers and Propositional Attitudes’ Journal of Philosophy 53, 177–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quine, W. O. V.: 1970, Philosopy of Logic, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quine, W. O. V.: 1977, ‘Intensions Revisited’ in French, Uehling and Wettstein (eds), Contemporary Perspectives in the Philosophy of Language, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, pp. 5–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rescher, N.: 1982, The Coherence Theory of Truth, University Press of America, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, S.: 1998, ‘Proof and Truth: Through Thick and Thin, Journal of Philosophy 95, 493–521.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, S.: 1984, Non-Standard Syntax and Semantics and Full Satisfaction Classes, Ph.D thesis, Yale University, New Haven, CT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soames, S.: 1997, ‘The Truth about Deflationism’ in Villanueva (ed.), Truth, Vol. 8 of Philosophical Issues, Ridgeview, Atascadero, pp. 1–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strawson, P.: 1949, ‘Truth’ Analysis 9, 83–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Takeuti, G.: 1987, Proof Theory, 2nd edn, North Holland, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarski, A.: 1956, ‘The Concept of Truth in Formalized Languages’ Logic, Semantics, Metamathematics, Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp. 152–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomason, R.: 1976, ‘Intensions Revisited’ in Kasher (ed.), Language in Focus: Foundations, Methods and Systems, Vol. 89 of Synthese Library, Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 119–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, C.: 1976, What is Truth?, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Halbach, V. How Innocent Is Deflationism?. Synthese 126, 167–194 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005275222332

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005275222332

Navigation