Abstract
A new procedure for generating optimal transport strategies has been applied in nine European cities. A public sector objective function which reflects concerns over efficiency, environmental impact, finance and sustainability is specified and a set of policy measures with acceptable ranges on each, identified. Optimal strategies based on combinations of these policy measures which generate the optimal value of the objective function, are identified, and compared between cities. Resulting policy recommendations are presented. The results demonstrate the importance of an integrated approach to transport strategy formulation. They emphasise the role of changes in public transport service levels and of fares, and of charges for car use. By contrast, new infrastructure projects are less frequently justified. In the majority of cities the revenues from car use charges are sufficient to finance other elements in the strategy. However, private sector involvement either in initial financing or in operation may be desirable. Revised objective functions to reflect private sector involvement are specified, and optimal strategies with private sector operation of public transport are also identified. The requirement to meet private sector rates of return for public transport operation typically results in lower frequencies and higher fares; charges for car use then need to be raised to satisfy public policy objectives, but system performance is reduced.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions (1998) A New Deal for Transport. London: HMSO.
Fowkes AS, Bristow AL, Bonsall PW & May AD (1998) A shortcut method for optimisation of strategic transport models. Transportation Research 32A(2).
Institution of Highways and Transportation (1996) Guidelines for Developing Urban Transport Strategies. London: IHT.
Mackie PJ & Preston JM (1996) The Local Bus Market: A Case Study of Regulatory Change. London: Avebury.
May AD, Roberts M & Mason P (1992) The development of transport strategies for Edinburgh. Proc Inst. Civil Engineers, Transport 95.
May AD & Roberts M (1995) The design of integrated transport strategies. Transport Policy 2(2).
May AD, Shepherd SP & Timms PM (1999) The specification of sustainable urban transport strategies. International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology 6, 293-304.
May AD, Shepherd SP, Minken H, Emberger G & Pfaffenbichler P (forthcoming) The Role of Response Surfaces in Specifying Transport Strategies.
Midgley P (1994) Urban Transport in Asia: An Operational Agenda for the 1990s. World Bank Technical Paper 224. Washington: The World Bank.
Minken H (1999) A sustainability objective function for local transport policy evaluation. Proc. 8th World Conference on Transport Research, Antwerp. Vol. 4.
The MVA Consultancy, Institute for Transport Studies & Oscar Faber TPA (1994) A Common Appraisal Framework for the Evaluation of Transport Projects. London: HMSO.
Proost S & van Dender K (1999) TRENEN II: Final Report for Publication. Brussels: European Commission DG VII.
Shepherd SP, Emberger G, Johansen K & Jarvi-Nykanen T (1997) OPTIMA: Optimisation of Policies for Transport Integration in Metropolitan Areas: a review of the method applied to nine European cities. Paper presented to the 25th European Transport Forum, 1-5 September 1997.
Snow A & Warren RS (1996) The marginal welfare cost of public funds: theory and estimates. Journal of Public Economics (61), 289-305.
Tinch R (1995) Valuation of Environmental Externalities. DoT 1995, London: HMSO.
Timms PM, May AD & Shepherd SP (forthcoming) The Sensitivity of Optimal Transport Strategies to Specification of Objectives.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
May, A.D., Shepherd, S.P. & Timms, P.M. Optimal transport strategies for European cities. Transportation 27, 285–315 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005274015858
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005274015858