REFERENCES
Gottman, J.M. (1993). The roles of conflict engagement, escalation, and avoidance in maritalinteraction: A longitudinal view of five types of couples. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 57, 47–52.
Jacobson, N.S. & Gottman, J.M. (1998). When men batter women: New insights into ending abusive relationships. NewYork: Simon and Schuster.
Jacobson, N.S. & Gurman, A.S. (Eds.). (1995). Clinical handbook of couple therapy.New York: Guilford Press.
Jacobson, N.S., Schmaling, K.B., & Holtzworth-Munroe, A. (1987). Component analysis ofbehavioral marital therapy: Two-year follow-up and prediction of relapse. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 13, 187–195.
Johnson, S.M. & Greenberg, L.S. (1994). The heart of the matter: Perspectives on emotion in marital therapy.New York: Brunner/Mazel.
Madanes, C. (1998). Sex, love and violence: Strategies for transformation. NewYork: Norton.
Malan, D.H. (1963). The study of brief psychotherapy. New York: Plenum Press.
Mann, J. (1973).Time limited psychotherapy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Prochaska, J.O., Norcross, J.C., & DiClemente, C.C. (1994). Changing for good. New York: William Morrow.
White, M. & Epston, D. (1990).Narrative means to therapeutic ends. New York: Norton.
Chernus, L. (1988). Why Kohut endures. Clinical SocialWork Journal, 16:336–354.
Ridley, M. (1999). Genome: the autobiography of a species in 23 chapters. NewYork: Harper-Collins.
Teicholz, J. (1999). Kohut, Loewald, and the postmoderns: A comparative study of self andrelationships. Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press.
Sanville, J. (1982). Partings and impartings: Toward a nonmedicalapproach to interruptions and terminations. Clinical Social Work Journal, 10, 123–131.
Sanville, J. (1991). Theplayground of psychoanalytic therapy. Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Basham, K. Book Review: SHORT-TERM COUPLE THERAPY. James M. Donovan (Ed.). New York: Guilford Press, 1999, 409 pages. Clinical Social Work Journal 29, 97–102 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005266813113
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005266813113