Skip to main content

The Benefits of Mutual Support Groups for Parents of Children With Disabilities

Abstract

This study examined what parents of children with disabilities and special needs found helpful about belonging to mutual support groups. Quantitative data (based on 56 parents from 6 groups) indicated that members found the groups very helpful and were very satisfied with the support they received from their groups; they also described the groups as high in cohesion, expressiveness, task orientation, and self-discovery. A grounded theory analysis of focus group data (based on 43 parents from 5 of the groups) indicated that such support was helpful in three broad domains: (1) the sociopolitical, which involved developing a sense of control and agency in the outside world; (2) the interpersonal, which involved asense of belonging to a community; and (3) the intraindividual, which involved self change. A central theme of identity change emerged as superordinate to these three categories.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

REFERENCES

  • Barker, C., Pistrang, N., & Elliott, R. E. (1994). Research methods in clinical and counselling psychology. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrera, M., & Ainlay, S. (1983). The structure of social support-a conceptual and empirical analysis. Journal of Community Psychology, 11, 133–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beresford, B. (1994). Resources and strategies: How parents cope with the care of a disabled child. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 35, 171–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borkman, T. J. (1990). Experiential, professional, and lay frames of reference. In T. J. Powell (Ed.), Working with self-help (pp. 3–30). Silver Spring, MD: NASW Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, A., & Hepple, S. (1989). How parents cope: Caring for a child who has a handicap. London: Barnardos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, E., Cunningham, C., & Sloper, P. (1988). Families and their children with Down's Syndrome: One feature in common. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, C., & Davis, H. (1985). Working with parents: Frameworks for collaboration. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dale, N. (1996). Working with families of children with special needs: Partnership and practice. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalley,G. (1992). Social welfare ideologies and normalisation: Links and conflicts. In H. Brown & H. Smith (Eds.), Normalisation: A reader for the nineties (pp. 100–111). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, R., Fischer, C. T., & Rennie, D. L. (1999). Evolving guidelines for publication of qualitative research studies in psychology and related fields. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 38, 215–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, R., & Wexler, M. M. (1994). Measuring the impact of sessions in process-experiential therapy of depression: The Session Impacts Scale. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 41, 166–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glendinning, C. (1983). Unshared care: Parents and their disabled children. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldklang, D. (1991). Research workshop on methodological issues in evaluating preventive interventions using mutual support. American Journal of Community Psychology, 19, 789–795.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottlieb, B. H. (1982). Mutual-help groups: Members' views of their benefits and of roles for professionals. Prevention in Human Services. Helping People to Help Themselves: Self-Help and Prevention, 1, 55–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gubrium, J. F. (1989). Local cultures and service policy. In J. F. Gubrium & D. Silverman (Eds.), The politics of field research: Sociology beyond enlightenment (pp. 94–112). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heller, T., Roccoforte, J. A., Hsieh, K., Cook, J. A., & Pickett, S. A. (1997). Benefits of support groups for families of adults with severe mental illness. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 67, 187–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henwood, K., & Pidgeon, N. (1992). Qualitative research and psychological theorising. British Journal of Psychology, 83, 97–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollins, S. (1985). Families and handicap. In M. Craft, J. Bicknell, & S. Hollins (Eds.), Mental handicap: A multi-disciplinary approach. London: Balliere Tindall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Humphreys, K., & Rappaport, J. (1994). Researching self-help/mutual aid groups and organizations: Many roads, one journey. Applied and Preventive Psychology, 3, 217–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, M. K., & Goodman, G. (1989). Psychology and self-help groups: Predictions on a partnership. American Psychologist, 44, 536–545.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larsen, D. L., Attkisson, C. C., Hargreaves, W. A., & Nguyen, T. D. (1979). Assessment of client/patient satisfaction: Development of a general scale. Evaluation and Program Planning, 2, 197–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lebow, J. (1984). Research assessing consumer satisfaction with mental health treatment: A review of findings. Evaluation and Program Planning, 6, 211–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine, M. (1988). An analysis of mutual assistance. American Journal of Community Psychology, 16, 167–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy, L. (1979). Processes and activities in groups. In M. Lieberman & L. Borman (Eds.), Self-help groups for coping with crisis: Origins, members, processes and impact (pp. 234–271). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lieberman, M. (1979). Analyzing change mechanisms in groups. In M. Lieberman & L. Borman (Eds.), Self-help groups for coping with crisis: Origins, members, processes and impact (pp. 194–233). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linder, R. (1970). Mothers of disabled children: The value of weekly group meetings. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 12, 202–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maton, K. I. (1988). Social support, organizational characteristics, psychological well-being, and group appraisal in three self-help group populations. American Journal of Community Psychology, 16, 53–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maton, K. I. (1993). Moving beyond the individual level of analysis in mutual help group research: An ecological paradigm. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 29, 272–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moos, R. H. (1986). Group Environment Scale Manual (2nd ed.). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moos, R. H. (1996). Understanding environments: The key to improving social processes and program outcomes. American Journal of Community Psychology, 24, 193–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, D. (1988). Focus groups as qualitative research. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orford, J. (1992). Community psychology: Theory and practice. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pahl, J., & Quine, L. (1987). Families with mentally handicapped children. In J. Orford (Ed), Coping with disorder in the family (pp. 39–61). London: Croom Helm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, G. (1985). With due care and attention: A review of research on informal care. London: Family Policy Studies Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pidgeon, N. (1996). Grounded theory: Theoretical background. In J. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of qualitative research methods for psychology and the social sciences (pp. 75–85). Leicester: BPS Books (The British Psychological Society).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pidgeon, N., & Henwood, K. (1996). Grounded theory: Practical implementation. In J. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of qualitative research methods for psychology and the social sciences (pp. 86–101). Leicester: BPS Books (The British Psychological Society).

    Google Scholar 

  • Quine, L., & Pahl, J. (1989). Stress and coping in families caring for a child with severe mental handicap: A longitudinal survey. University of Kent at Canterbury: Institute of Social and Applied Psychology and Centre for Health Service Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quine, L., & Pahl, J. (1991). Stress and coping in mothers caring for a child with severe learning difficulties: A test of Lazarus' transaction model of coping. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 1, 57–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rappaport, J. (1993). Narrative studies, personal stories, and identity transformation in the mutual help context. The Journal of Applied Behavioural Science, 29, 239–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rennie, D. L., Phillips, J. R., & Quartaro, G. K. (1988). Grounded theory:Apromising approach to conceptualization in psychology? Canadian Psychology, 29, 139–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, C. R. (1957). The necessary and sufficient conditions of therapeutic personality change. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 21, 95–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, P. (1997, Spring). Working in partnership with parents of children with disabilities. Children UK (Quarterly Newsletter of National Children's Bureau), 14.

  • Shotter, J., & Gergen, K. (1989). Texts of identity. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singhi, P., Goyal, L., Pershad, D., Singhi, S., & Walia, B. (1990). Psychosocial problems in families of disabled children. British Journal of Medical Psychology, 63, 173–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, M. (1997). What do parents of children with disabilities and special needs find helpful about mutual support groups? Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University College London, London, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiles, W. B. (1993). Quality control in qualitative research. Clinical Psychology Review, 13, 593–618.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiles, W. B., Reynolds, S., Hardy, G. E., Rees, A., Barkham, M., & Shapiro, D. A. (1994). Evaluation and description of psychotherapy sessions by clients using the session evaluation questionnaire and the session impacts scale. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 41, 175–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tajfel, H. (1981). Human groups and social categories: Studies in social psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, S. E., Falke, R. L., Shoptaw, S. J., & Lichtman, R. R. (1986). Social support, support groups, and the cancer patient. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 54, 608–615.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toro, P. A., Rappaport, J., & Seidman, E. (1987) Social climate comparison of mutual help and psychotherapy groups, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology.55, 430, 431.

    Google Scholar 

  • Videka-Sherman, L., & Lieberman, M. (1982). The effects of participation in a self-help group for bereaved parents. Prevention in Human Services. Helping People to Help Themselves: Self-Help and Prevention, 1, 69–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Videka-Sherman, L., & Lieberman, M. (1985). The effects of self-help and psychotherapy intervention on child loss: The limits of recovery. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 55, 70–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfensberger, W. (1980). The definition of normalization: update, problems, disagreements and misunderstandings. In R. Flynn & K. Nitsch (Eds.), Normalization, social integration and community services. Baltimore: University Park Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfensberger, W. (1983). Social role valorization: A proposed new term for the principal of normalization. Mental Retardation, 21, 234–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woods, G. (1981). Profiles: Parents help themselves. Child: Care, Health and Development, 7, 51–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yalom, I. (1975). The theory and practice of group psychotherapy. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Solomon, M., Pistrang, N. & Barker, C. The Benefits of Mutual Support Groups for Parents of Children With Disabilities. Am J Community Psychol 29, 113–132 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005253514140

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005253514140

  • mutual support groups
  • self-help
  • parents
  • children with disabilities