Skip to main content
Log in

The Economics and Politics of the Structure of Public Expenditure

  • Published:
Public Choice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The paper derives a complete system ofdemand equations for public consumptionexpenditures as the outcome of rationalbehaviour in a model where governmentmaximizes expected electoral support. Theallocation of expenditures is found todepend not only on the prices of publicservices and total expenditure and tosatisfy the constraints of demand theory,which have been the focus of attention ofprevious empirical studies of theallocation of public expenditures, but, inaddition, on the prices of privateconsumption goods, the distribution ofvoter incomes and the expected change invoter support from varying the levels ofpublic provision.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams, J. (1999). Multiparty spatial competition with probabilistic voting. Public Choice 99: 259-274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barr, J. L. and Davies, O.A. (1966). An elementary political and economic theory of the expenditure of local governments. Southern Economic Journal 33: 149-165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergstrom, T.C. and Goodman, R.P. (1973). Private demands for public goods. American Economic Review 63: 280-296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borcherding, T.E. and Deacon, R.T. (1972). The demand for the services of non-federal governments. American Economic Review 62: 891-901.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coyote, P.C. and Landon, S. (1990). Cost-sharing versus block funding in a federal system: A demand systems approach. Canadian Journal of Economics 23: 817-838.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coughlin, P. J. (1992). Probabilistic voting theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coughlin, P.J., Mueller, D.C. and Murrell, P. (1990). A model of electoral competition with interest groups. Economics Letters 32: 307-311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coughlin, P.J. and Nitzan, S. (1981). Electoral outcomes with probabilistic voting and Nash social welfare maxima. Journal of Public Economics 15: 113-121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deacon, R.T. (1978). A demand model for the local public sector. Review of Economics and Statistics 60: 180-202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deaton, A. and Muellbauer, J. (1980). Economics and consumer behaviour. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denzau, A.T. and Parks, R.P. (1979). Deriving public sector preferences. Journal of Public Economics 11: 335-352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunne, J.P., Pashardes, P. and Smith, R.P. (1984). Needs, costs and bureaucracy: The allocation of public consumption in the U.K. Economic Journal 94: 1-15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunne, J.P. and Smith, R.P. (1984). The allocative efficiency of government expenditure: Some comparative tests. European Economic Review 20: 381-394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enelow, J.M. and Hinich, M.J. (1989). A general probabilistic theory of elections. Public Choice 61: 101-113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haynes, K. and Grosskopf, S. (1984). The role of functional form in estimating the demand for local public goods. Review of Economics and Statistics 66: 63-179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hettich, W. and Winer, S.L. (1988). Economic and political foundation of tax structure. American Economic Review 78: 701-712.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hettich, W. and Winer, S.L. (1999). Democratic choice and taxation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirchgässner, G. (2000). Probabilistic voting and equilibrium: An impossibility result. Public Choice 103: 35-48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin T-M., Enelow, J.M. and Dorussen, H. (1999). Equilibrium in multicandidate probabilistic spatial voting. Public Choice 98: 59-82.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMillan, M.L. and Amoako-Tuffour, J. (1988). An examination of preferences for local public sector outputs. Review of Economics and Statistics 70: 45-54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pitarakis, J.-Y. and Tridimas, G. (1999). Total expenditure endogeneity and the allocation of public consumption expenditure in the U.K. Economic Modelling 16: 279-291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanzi, V. and Schuknecht, L. (2000). Public spending in the 20th century: A global perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tridimas, G. (1985). Economic theory and the allocation of public expenditures in Greece. Greek Economic Review 7: 34-52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tridimas, G. (1999). A demand-theoretic analysis of public consumption priorities in the U.K. Public Finance Review 27: 599-623.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tridimas, G. (2000a). Consumer demand and public consumption expenditure in the U.K. Unpublished manuscript.

  • Tridimas, G. (2000b). Public provision and administration costs under political equilibrium. Processed.

  • Usher, D. (1994). The significance of the probabilistic voting theorem. Canadian Journal of Economics 27: 433-445.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warskett, G., Winer, S.L. and Hettich, W. (1998). The complexity of tax structures in competitive political systems. International Tax and Public Finance 5: 123-151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winer, S.L. and Hettich, W. (1998). What is missed if we leave out collective choice in the analysis of taxation? National Tax Journal 51: 372-389.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tridimas, G. The Economics and Politics of the Structure of Public Expenditure. Public Choice 106, 299–316 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005250716104

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005250716104

Keywords

Navigation