Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Lottery Dependent Utility: a Reexamination

  • Published:
Theory and Decision Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In order to accommodate empirically observed violations of the independence axiom of expected utility theory Becker and Sarin (1987) proposed their model of lottery dependent utility in which the utility of an outcome may depend on the lottery being evaluated. Although this dependence is intuitively very appealing and provides a simple functional form of the resulting decision criterion, lottery dependent utility has been nearly completely neglected in the recent literature on decision making under risk. The goal of this paper is to revive the lottery dependent utility model. Therefore, we derive first a sound axiomatic foundation of lottery dependent utility. Secondly, we develop a discontinuous variant of the model which can accommodate boundary effects and may lead to a lexicographic non-expected utility model. Both analyses are accompanied by considering some functional specifications which are in accordance with recent experimental results and may have significant applications in business and management science.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Battalio, R.C., Kagel, J.H. and Jiranyakul, K. (1990), Testing between alternative models of choice under risk: Some initial results, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 3: 25-50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, J.L. and Sarin, R.K. (1987), Lottery dependent utility, Management Science 33: 1367-1382.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camerer, C.F. (1992), Recent tests of generalized utility theories, in W. Edwards (ed.), Utility: Measurement, Theories, and Applications, pp. 207-251. Dordrecht.

  • Camerer, C.F. and Ho, H.T. (1994), Violations of the betweenness axiom and nonlinearity in probability, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 8: 167-196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chew, S.H. (1989), Axiomatic utility theories with the betweenness property, Annals of Operations Research 19: 273-298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chew, S.H. and Epstein, L.G. (1989), A unifying approach to axiomatic nonexpected utility theories, Journal of Economic Theory 49: 207-240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chew, S.H., Epstein, L.G. and Segal, U. (1991), Mixture symmetry and quadratic utility, Econometrica 59: 139-163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chipman, J.S. (1971), Non-Archimedean behavior under risk: An elementary analysis with application to the theory of assets, in J.S. Chipman, L. Hurwicz, M.K. Richter and H.F. Sonnenschein (eds.), Preferences, Utility, and Demand: A Minnesota Symposium, pp. 289-318. New York.

  • Cohen, M. (1992), Security level, potential level, expected utility: A three-criteria decision model under risk, Theory and Decision 33: 101-134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, M. and Jaffray, J.Y. (1988), Preponderence of the certainty effect over probabillity distortion in decision making under risk, in B.R. Munier (ed.), Risk, Decision, and Rationality, pp. 173-187. Dordrecht.

  • Conlisk, J. (1989), Three variants on the Allais Example, American Economic Review 79: 392-407.

    Google Scholar 

  • Debreu, G. (1964), Continuity properties of Paretian Utility, International Economic Review 5: 285-293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dekel, E. (1986), An axiomatic characterization of preferences under uncertainty: Weakening the independence axiom, Journal of Economic Theory 40: 304-318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diecidue, E., Schmidt, U. and Wakker, P.P. (1999), A theory of the gambling effect. Unpublished manuscript, Tilburg University.

  • Encarnación, J. (1964), Constraints and the firmt's utility function, Review of Economic Studies 31: 113-120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Essid, S. (1997), Choice under risk with certainty and potential effects: A general axiomatic model, Mathematical Social Sciences 34: 223-247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, C. (1965), The theory of multidimensional utility analysis in relation to multiple-goal business behavior: A synthesis, Southern Economic Journal 32: 169-175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishburn, P.C. (1971), A study of lexicographic expected utility, Management Science 17: 672-678.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gigliotti, G. and Sopher, B. (1993), A test of generalized expected utility theory, Theory and Decision 35: 75-106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilboa, I. (1988), A combination of expected utility and maxmin decision criteria, Journal of Mathematical Psychology 32: 405-420.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grandmont, J.M. (1972), Continuity properties of von Neumann-Morgenstern utility, Journal of Economic Theory 4: 45-57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, J.R. and Jullien, B. (1988), Ordinal independence in nonlinear utility theory, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 1: 355-387.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gul, F. (1991), A theory of disappointment aversion, Econometrica 59: 667-686.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadar, J. and Russell, W.R. (1969), Rules for ordering uncertain prospects, American Economic Review 59: 25-34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harless, D.W. (1992), Predictions about indifference curves inside the unit triangle: A test of variants of expected utility theory, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 18: 391-414.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harless, D.W. and Camerer, C.F. (1994), The predictive utility of generalized expected utility theories, Econometrica 62: 1251-1289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hey, J.D. and Orme, C. (1994), Investigating generalizations of expected utility theory using experimental data, Econometrica 62: 1291-1326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaffray, J.Y. (1988), Choice under risk and the security factor: An axiomatic model, Theory and Decision 24: 169-200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D. and Tversky, A. (1979), Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk, Econometrica 47: 263-291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karni, E. and Schmeidler, D. (1991), Utility theory with uncertainty in: W. Hildenbrand and H. Sonnenschein (eds.), Handbook of Mathematical Economics, Vol. IV, pp. 1763-1831. Amsterdam.

  • Machina, J.M. (1982), Expected utility analysis without the independence axiom, Econometrica 50: 277-323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neilson, W.S. (1992a), Some mixed results on boundary effects, Economics Letters 39: 275-278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neilson, W.S. (1992b), A mixed fan hypothesis and its implications for behavior toward risk, Journal of Economic Behavior nd Organization 19: 197-211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, P. and Read, R. (1961), representation problems for preference orderings, Journal of Economic Behavior 1: 149-169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quiggin, J.P. and Wakker, P. (1994), The axiomatic basis of anticipated utility: A clarification, Journal of Economic Theory 64: 486-499.

    Google Scholar 

  • Puppe, C. (1991), Distorted Probabilities and Choice under Risk. Berlin.

  • Schmidt, U. (1998), A measurement of the certainty effect, Journal of Mathematical Psychology 42: 32-47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, U. (1999), An axiomatization of risk-value models. Unpublished manuscript, University of Kiel.

  • Schmidt, U. (2000), Alternatives to expected utility: some formal theories, in: P.J. Hammond, S. Baberá and C. Seidl (eds.), Handbook of Utility Theory, Vol. II. Boston.

  • Segal, U. (1989), Anticipated utility: A measure representation approach, Annals of Operations Research 19: 359-373.

    Google Scholar 

  • Segal, U. (1993), The measure representation: A correction, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 6: 99-107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sugden, R. (2000), Alternatives to expected utility: Foundations and concepts, in: P.J. Hammond, S. Baberá and C. Seidl (eds.), Handbook of Utility Theory, Vol. II. Boston.

  • Viscusi, W.K. (1989), Prospective reference theory: Toward an explanation of the paradoxes, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 2: 235-264.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institut für Finanzwissenschaft und Sozialpolitik, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Olshausenstr. 40, 24098, Kiel, Germany

    Ulrich Schmidt

Authors
  1. Ulrich Schmidt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ulrich Schmidt.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schmidt, U. Lottery Dependent Utility: a Reexamination. Theory and Decision 50, 35–58 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005219005058

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005219005058

Search

Navigation