Abstract
Flux pile-up magnetic merging solutions are discussed using the simple robust arguments of traditional steady-state reconnection theory. These arguments determine a unique scaling for the field strength and thickness of the current layer, namely B s∼η−1/3, l∼η2/3, which are consistent with a variety of plasma inflow conditions. Next we demonstrate that flux pile-up merging can also be understood in terms of exact magnetic annihilation solutions. Although simple annihilation models cannot provide unique reconnection scalings, we show that the previous current sheet scalings derive from an optimized solution in which the peak dynamic and magnetic pressures balance in the reconnection region. The build-up of magnetic field in the current sheet implicit in flux pile-up solutions naturally leads to the idea of saturation. Hydromagnetic pressure effects limit the magnetic field in the sheet, yielding an upper limit on the reconnection rate for such solutions. This rate is still far superior to the Sweet–Parker merging rate, which can be derived by seeking solutions that avoid all forms of saturation. Finally we compare time dependent numerical simulations of the coalescence instability with the optimized flux pile-up models. This comparison suggests that merging driven by the relatively slow approach of large flux systems may be favored in practice.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bentley, R. D. and Mariska, J. T.: 1996, Magnetic Reconnection in the Solar Atmosphere, Astronomical Society of the Pacific, San Francisco, California.
Besser, B. P., Biernat, H. K., and Rijnbeek, R. P.: 1990, Planetary Space Sci. 38, 411.
Bhattacharjee, A., Brunel, F., and Tajima, T.: 1983, Phys. Fluids 26, 3332.
Biskamp, D.: 1986, Phys. Fluids 29, 1520.
Biskamp, D.: 1994, Phys. Reports 237, 181.
Biskamp, D. and Welter, H.: 1980, Phys. Rev. Lett. 44, 1069.
Clarke, A.: 1965, Phys. Fluids 8, 644.
Craig, I. J. D., Fabling, R. B., and Watson, P. G.: 1997, Astrophys. J. 485, 383.
Craig, I. J. D. and Henton, S. M.: 1995, Astrophys. J. 450, 280.
Craig, I. J. D. and McClymont, A. N.: 1993, Astrophys. J. 405, 207.
Craig, I. J. D. and Watson, P. G.: 1992, Astrophys. J. 393, 385.
Craig, I. J. D. and Watson, P. G.: 1999, Astrophys. J. 516, 924.
DeLuca, E. E. and Craig, I. J. D.: 1992, Astrophys. J. 390, 679.
Finn, J. M. and Kaw, P. K.: 1977, Phys. Fluids 20, 72.
Forbes, T. G. and Priest, E. R.: 1987, Rev. Geophys. 25, 1587.
Hassam, A. B.: 1992, Astrophys. J. 399, 159.
Jardine, M. and Allen, H. R.: 1998, Solar Phys. 177, 411.
Litvinenko, Y. E.: 1999, Solar Phys. 186, 291.
Litvinenko, Y. E. and Craig, I. J. D.: 1999, Solar Phys. (submitted).
Priest, E. R.: 1996, in K. Tsinganos (ed.) Solar and Astrophysical MHD Flows, Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, the Netherlands, p. 171.
Priest, E. R. and Forbes, T. G.: 1986, J. Geophys. Res. 91, 5579.
Pritchett, P. L. and Wu, C. C.: 1979, Phys. Fluids 22, 2140.
Rickard, G. J. and Craig, I. J. D.: 1993, Phys. Fluids B5, 956.
Sonnerup, B. U. Ö. and Priest, E. R.: 1975, J. Plasma Phys. 14, 283.
Tajima, T. and Shibata, K.: 1997, Plasma Astrophysics, Addison-Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts.
Watson, P. G. and Craig, I. J. D.: 1997a, Phys. Plasmas 4, 101.
Watson, P. G. and Craig, I. J. D.: 1997b, Phys. Plasmas 4, 110. ??
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Craig, I., Watson, P. Flare-like energy release by flux pile-up reconnection. Solar Physics 191, 359–379 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005210307884
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005210307884