Abstract
It is sometimes argued that the fact that possession of perfect knowledge about the future is impossible, means that it is impossible for decisions to be rational. This reasoning is fallacious. If rationality is given a new interpretation, then decisions can be considered rational. A theory of decision that has as its basis Peirce’s theory of abduction can provide a new way of understanding decisions as rational processes. The Peircean theory of decision (i) considers decisions as part of a complete strategy, and (ii) shows that decision making is governed by the same rules as scientific abduction. These rules are neither permissive rules like rules of deductive inference nor predictive like laws of nature, but rather genuine laws of conduct that determine what step should be made, if a given end is to be reached.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
REFERENCES
Anderson, D. R.: 1986, 'The Evolution of Peirce's Concept of Abduction', Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, XXII, 145-164.
Boland, L. A.,1992), "The Principles of Economics-Some Lies My Teachers Told Me', Routledge, New York/London.
Brogaard, B. O.: 1999, 'Peirce on Abduction and Rational Control', Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, XXXV(1), 129-155.
Friedman, M.: 1984, 'The Methodology of Positive Economics', in D. M. Hausman (ed.), The Philosophy of Economics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Hintikka, J.: 1998, 'What is Abduction? The Fundamental Problem of Contemporary Epistemology', Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, XXXIV(3), 503-534.
Kapitan, T.: 1997, 'Peirce and the Structure of Abductive Inference', in N. Hauser, D. D. Roberts, and J. V. Evra (eds.), Studies in the Logic of Charles Sanders Peirce, Indiana University Press, Bloomington/Indianapolis, 477-96.
Kirzner, I. M.: 1990, 'Uncertainty, Discovery, and Human Action: A Study of the Entrepreneurial Profile in the Misesian System', in S. Littlechild (ed.), Austrian Economics, vol. III, Edward Elgar, Vermont.
Machlup, F.: 1980, Knowledge: Its Creation, Distribution, and Economic Significance, vol. 1-3, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
Menger, C.: 1985, Investigations into the Method of the Social Sciences with Special Reference to Economics, L. H. White (intro.), Louis Schneider (ed.), F. J. Nock (trans.), New York University Press, New York/London.
Peirce, C. S.: 1931-58, Collected Papers, vol. 1-8 (CP), Charles Hardshorne and Paul Weiss (eds.), The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
Potter, V. G.: 1967, Charles S. Peirce-On Norms & Ideals, The University of Massachusetts Press, Massachusetts.
Sfendoni-Mentzou, D.: 1997, 'Peirce on Continuity and Laws of Nature', Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, XXXIII(3), 449-466.
Shackle, G.: 1972, Epistemic and Economics: A Critique of Economic Doctrines, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Shanahan, T.: 1986, 'The First Moment of Scientific Inquiry: C. S. Peirce on the Logic of Abduction, Transaction of the Charles S. Peirce Society, XXII(2), 449-466.
Smith, B.: 1996, Austrian Philosophy-The Legacy of Franz Brentano (1994), Open Court, Chicago and La Salle, Illinois.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Brogaard, B. A Peircean Theory of Decision. Synthese 118, 383–401 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005154800638
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005154800638
Keywords
- True Generality
- Brute Fact
- Abductive Inference
- Complete Strategy
- Pure Possibility