Skip to main content
Log in

Parent Involvement, Influence, and Satisfaction in Magnet Schools: Do Reasons for Choice Matter?

  • Published:
The Urban Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper explores the relationships between parents' reasons for choosing a magnet school and their levels of satisfaction, involvement, and influence with the school. Data are reported from over a thousand magnet school parents in two urban districts. The results suggest three general findings: (1) As reported in previous research, magnet school parents choose schools for a wide array of reasons and are highly satisfied with their chosen school; (2) parents' reasons for choice are important predictors of their levels of satisfaction, influence, and involvement with the school; and (3) parents who choose for values reasons, as compared to other reasons, are more likely to be involved in and satisfied with their school of choice and report that parents have influence over school decisions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Archbald, D. A. (1988). Magnet Schools, Voluntary Desegregation, and Public Choice Theory: Limits and Possibilities in a Big City School System. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Wisconsin– Madison.

  • Arizona Department of Education, Research and Development Division (1992). The Status of School Choice in Arizona, 1991– 1992. Phoenix: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauch, P., and Goldring, E. (1995). Parent involvement and school responsiveness: Facilitating the home-school connection in schools of choice. Education Evaluation and Policy Analysis 17: 10–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauch, P., and Goldring, E. (1996). Parent involvement and teacher decision making in urban high schools of choice. Urban Education 31(4): 403–431.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauch, P., and Goldring, E. (1998). Parent-teacher participation in the context of school restructuring. Peabody Journal of Education 73: 15–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blank, R. (1990). Educational effects of magnet schools. In W. Clune and J. Witte (eds.), Choice and Control in American Education, Vol. 2: The Practice of Choice, Decentralization and School Restructuring (pp. 77–109). Bristol, PA: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bronfenbrenner, U., Moen, P., & Garbarino, J. (1984). Child, family, and community. In R. Parke (ed.), Review of child development and research, Vol. 7 (pp. 283–328). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching (1992). School Choice: A Special Report. Princeton, NJ: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, D. K., and Farrar, E. (1977). Power to parents? The study of educational vouchers. Public Interest 48: 72–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J., and Hoffer, T. (1987). Public and Private High Schools: The Impact of Communities New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cookson, P. (1993). School Choice and the Creation of Community. Paper presented at the workshop, “Theory and Practice in School Autonomy and Choice: Bringing the Community and the School Back In.” Tel Aviv University, Israel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cremin, L. (1978). Family community linkages in American education: Some comments on the recent historiography. Teachers College Record 79(4): 683–704.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elam, S., and Rose, L. (1995). The 27th Annual Phi Delta Kappa/Gallup Poll of the public' attitudes toward the public schools. Phi Delta Kappan 77(1): 41–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erickson, D. A. (1982). Disturbing evidence about the “one best system.” In R. B. Everhart (ed.), The Public School Monopoly. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fossey, R. (1994). Open enrollment in Massachusetts: Why families choose. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 16: 320–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gamoran, A. (1996). Student achievement in public magnet, public comprehensive, and private city high schools. Education Evaluation and Policy Analysis 19(1): 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldring, E., and Bauch, P. (1993). Parental Involvement and School Responsiveness: Facilitating the Home-School Connection in Schools of Choice. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Atlanta.

  • Goldring, E., and Hausman, C. (1996). Reasons for Parental Choice of Schools. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York.

  • Goldring, E., and Shapira, R. (1993). Choice, empowerment, and involvement: What satisfies parents? Education Evaluation and Policy Analysis 15: 396–409.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henig, J. R. (1994). Rethinking School Choice: Limits of the Market Metaphor. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschman, A. O. (1970). Exit, Voice, and Loyalty. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lareau, A. (1989). Home Advantage: Social Class and Parental Intervention in Elementary Education. Philadelphia: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maddaus, J. (1990). Parental choice of school: What parents think and do. In C. B. Cazden (ed.), Review of Research in Education, vol. 16. Washington, DC: AERA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinez, V., Godwin, K., and Kemerer, F. (1996). Public school choice in San Antonio: Who chooses and with what effects? In B. Fuller, R. Elmore, and G. Orfield (eds.), Who Chooses? Who Loses? Culture, Institutions, and the Unequal Effects of School Choice (pp. 50–69). New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinez, V., Thomas, K., and Kemerer, F. (1994). Who chooses and why: A look at five choice plans. Phi Delta Kappan 75(9): 678–681.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minnesota House of Representatives, Research Department (1990). Open Enrollment Study: Student and District Participation, 1989– 1990. St. Paul: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orfield, G., Trent, W., Valencia, R., and Rumberger, R. (1996). Access Compromised. Symposium at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York.

  • Raywid, M. A. (1991). Is there a case for choice? Network News and Views 10(1): 1–6. Nashville, TN: Educational Excellence Network.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raywid, M. A. (1992). Choice orientations, discussions, and prospects. In P. W. Cookson, Jr., (ed.), The Choice Controversy (pp. 3–23). Newbury Park, CA: Corwin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossell, C. H., and Clarke, R. C. (1988). The Carrot or the Stick for School Desegregation Policy? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans.

  • Smrekar, C. (1993). Building community: The influence of school organization and management. Advances in Research and Theories of School Management and Educational Policy 2: 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smrekar, C. (1996). The Impact of School Choice and Community: In the Interest of Families and Schools. Albany: SUNY Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smrekar, C., and Goldring, E. (1999). School Choice in Urban America: Magnet Schools and the Pursuit of Equity. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steel, L., and Levine, R. (1994). Educational Innovation in Multiracial Contexts: The Growth of Magnet Schools in American Education. Palo Alto, CA: American Institutes for Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells, A. S. (1996). African-American students’ views of choice. In B. Fuller, R. Elmore, and G. Orfield (eds.), Who Chooses? Who Loses? Culture, Institutions, and the Unequal Effects of School Choice (pp. 25–49). New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, M. F., Hancher, K. S., and Hunter, A. (1983). Parents and school choice: A household survey. Washington, DC: Office of Educational Research and Improvement.

    Google Scholar 

  • Witte, J. F. (1996). Who benefits from the Milwaukee Choice Program? In B. Fuller, R. Elmore, and G. Orfield (eds.), Who Chooses? Who Loses? Culture, Institutions, and the Unequal Effects of School Choice (pp. 25–49).

  • Yu, C., and Taylor, W. (1997). Difficult Choices: Do Magnet Schools Serve Children in Need? Washington, DC: Citizens’ Commission on Civil Rights.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hausman, C., Goldring, E. Parent Involvement, Influence, and Satisfaction in Magnet Schools: Do Reasons for Choice Matter?. The Urban Review 32, 105–121 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005121214860

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005121214860

Navigation