Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Case and Reanalysis

  • Published:
Journal of Psycholinguistic Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper we discuss an asymmetry in the Case system of German and its implications for human sentence processing: the asymmetry between nominative/accusative and dative case. Starting from the assumption that dative case has a distinct grammatical representation--dative DPs are embedded into an extra structural layer KP--the results of two experiments will be presented, which show that dative assignment during reanalysis is accompanied by additional processing operations that are not needed when accusative or nominative are assigned. In particular, we show that dative assignment during reanalysis triggers reaccess to the mental lexicon, giving rise to greater processing difficulty. We conclude with a discussion of empirical and theoretical consequences of our findings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Bader, M. (in press). On reanalysis: evidence from German. In B. Hemforth & L. Konieczny (Eds.), German sentence processing. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

  • Bader, M., & Meng, M. (1999). Subject-object ambiguities in German embedded clauses: an across-the-board comparison. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 28, 121–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bayer, J., Bader, M., & Meng, M. (1999). Morphological underspecification meets oblique Case: Syntactic and processing effects. Manuscript submitted for publication.

  • Duffy, S. A., Morris, R. K., & Rayner, K. (1988). Lexical ambiguity and fixation times in reading. Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 429–446.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferreira, F., & Henderson, J. (1991). Recovery from misanalysis of garden path sentences. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 725–745.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fodor, J. D., & Inoue, A. (1994). The diagnosis and cure of garden paths. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 24, 407–434.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fodor, J. D., & Inoue, A. (1998). Attach Anyway. In J. Fodor & F. Ferreira (Eds.), Reanalysis in sentence processing. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frazier, L. (1987). Sentence processing: A tutorial review. In M. Coltheart (Ed.), Attention and performance XII: The psychology of reading. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallmann, P. (1996). Die Steuerung der Flexion in der DP. Linguistische Berichte, 164, 283–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hemforth, B., Konieczny, L., & Strube, G. (1993) Incremental syntax processing and parsing strategies. In Proceedings of the XVth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopf, J.-M., Bayer, J., Bader, M., & Meng, M. (1998). Event-related brain potentials and case information in syntactic ambiguities. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 10, 264–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaan, E. (1998). Sensitivity to NP-type: Processing subject–object ambiguities in Dutch. Journal of Semantics, 15, 335–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meng, M. (1997). Grammatik und Sprachverarbeitung: Psycholinguistische Untersuchungen zur Berechnung syntaktischer Strukturen beim Lesen. Doctoral dissertation, University of Jena.

  • Meng, M., & Bader, M. (1998). The role of case and number features in syntactic ambiguity resolution. In M. de Vincenzi & V. Lombardo (Eds.), Cross-linguistic perspectives on language processing. Dordrecht: Kluwer, in press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meng, M., & Bader, M. (1999). Ungrammaticality detection and garden path strength: evidence for serial parsing. Manuscript submitted for publication.

  • Meng, M., & Bader, M. (in press). Mode of disambiguation and garden path strength: An investigation of subject-object ambiguities in German. Language and Speech, in press.

  • Scheepers, C., Hemforth, B., & Konieczny, L. (1998). The impact of constituent ordering on Case assignment in German. Poster presentation, AMLaP-98; University of Freiburg.

  • Schlesewsky, M., Fanselow, G., Kliegl, R., & Krems, J. (in press). Preferences for grammatical functions in the processing of locally ambiguous wh-questions in German. In B. Hemforth & L. Konieczny (Eds.), Geman sentence processing. Dordrecht: Kluwer, in press

  • Sturt, P., & Crocker, M. (1998). Generalized monotonicity. In J. Fodor & F. Ferreira (Eds.), Reanalysis in sentence processing. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogel, F., & Steinbach, M. (1998). The dative in German: an oblique Case. Linguistische Berichte, 174, 3–28.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Universität Jena, Jena, Germany

    Markus Bader

  2. Universität Jena, Jena, Germany

    Michael Meng & Josef Bayer

Authors
  1. Markus Bader
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Michael Meng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Josef Bayer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bader, M., Meng, M. & Bayer, J. Case and Reanalysis. J Psycholinguist Res 29, 37–52 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005120422899

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005120422899

Keywords

Search

Navigation