Abstract
The debate between Derek Freeman and the silenced ghost of Margaret Mead remains unintelligible to many readers because of the absence of historicist context for the early work of Mead. Despite Freeman's apparent attention to historical documents, he makes virtually no effort to situate Mead within Boasian anthropology or the interwar years more generally. This paper provides such contexts in terms of the Boasian paradigm of the time and how Mead was understood by her contemporaries. This context dispels the black and white indictment of a disciplinary heroine with feet of clay, and provides the baseline for a more balanced assessment.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Allen, J. S. (1989). Franz Boas's physical anthropology. Curr. Anthropol. 30: 79–84.
Barnes, B. (1972). Sociology of Science. Penguin, Baltimore.
Beals, R., and Hoijer, H. (1953). An Introduction to Anthropology. Macmillan, New York.
Boas, F. (1903). Heredity in head form. Am. Anthropol. 5: 530–538.
Boas, F. (1912). Changes in Bodily Form of Descendants of Immigrants. Senate Document 208, 61st Congress, Washington.
Boas, F. (1940). Race, Language, and Culture. Free Press, New York.
Côtè, J. E. (1992). Was Mead wrong about coming of age in Samoa? J. Youth Adolesc. 21: 499–527.
Côtè, J. E. (1994). Adolescent Storm and Stress. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
Côtè, J. E. (2000). Was Coming of Age in Samoa based on a “fateful hoaxing”? Curr. Anthropol. 40: in press.
Cressman, L. S. (1988). A Golden Journey. University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City.
Darnell, R. (1977). Hallowell's Bear Ceremonialism and the emergence of Boasian anthropology. Ethos 5: 13–30.
Darnell, R. (1990a). Edward Sapir. University of California Press, Berkeley.
Darnell, R. (1990b). Franz Boas, Edward Sapir, and the Americanist text tradition. Historiographia Linguistica 17: 129–144.
Darnell, R. (1998a). And Along Came Boas. John Benjamins, Amsterdam.
Darnell, R. (1998b). Camelot at Yale: The construction and dismantling of the Sapirian synthesis, 1931–39. Am. Anthropol. 100: 361–372
Darnell, R. (1999). Theorizing American anthropology: Continuities from the B. A. E. to the Boasians. In Valentine, L., and Darnell, R. (eds.), Theorizing the Americanist Tradition, University ofToronto Press, Toronto, 38–51.
Darnell, R. (2000). Invisible Genealogies. University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln.
Dixon, R. B. (1928). The Building of Culture. Scribner's, New York.
Freeman, D. (1983). Margaret Mead and Samoa. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
Freeman, D. (1987). Review of Holmes, Quest for the Real Samoa (1987). J. Polynes. Soc. 96: 392–400.
Freeman, D. (1991a). Franz Boas and the Samoan researches of Margaret Mead. Curr. Anthropol. 32: 322–330.
Freeman, D. (1991b). “There's trick i' th' world”: An historical analysis of the Samoan researches of Margaret Mead. Visual Anthropol. Rev. 7: 103–128.
Freeman, D. (1999). The Fateful Hoaxing of Margaret Mead. Westview, Boulder, CO.
Handy, E. S. C. (1923). The Native Culture of the Marquesas. Bishop Museum, Honolulu.
Hays, T. E. (1997). Sacred texts and introductory texts: The case of Margaret Mead's Samoa. Pacific Stud. 20 (3): 81–103.
Kroeber, A. L. (1915). Eighteen professions. Am. Anthropol. 17: 283–288.
Kroeber, A. L. (1917). The superorganic. Am. Anthropol. 19: 441–447.
Kroeber, A. L. (1923). Anthropology. Harcourt, Brace, New York.
Kroeber, A. L. (1931). Reviewof Growing up in New Guinea by Margaret Mead (1930). Am. Anthropol. 33: 248–250.
Kroeber, A. L. (1948). Anthropology. Harcourt, Brace, New York.
Kroeber, A. L., and Waterman, T. T. (1931). Sourcebook in Anthropology. Harcourt, Brace, New York.
Kuhn, T. S. (1977). The Essential Tension. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Latour, B. (1987). Science in Action. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Lowie, R. H. (1929). Review of Mead (1928). Am. Anthropol. 29: 532–534.
Lowie, R. H. (1937). The History of Ethnological Theory. Holt, New York.
Lowie, R. H. (1940). Native languages as ethnographic tools. Am. Anthropol. 42: 81–89.
McDowell, N. (1984). Review of Freeman (1983). Pacific Stud. 7: 99–140.
Malinowski, B. (1922). Argonauts of the West Pacific. Dutton, New York.
Malinowski, B. (1924). Psycho-analysis and anthropology. Psyche 4: 293–326.
Mead, M. (1928). Coming of Age in Samoa. Morrow, New York.
Mead, M. (1930). Social Organization of Manu'a. Bishop Museum, Honolulu.
Mead, M. (1939). Native languages as fieldwork tools. Am. Anthropol. 41: 189–205.
Mead, M. (1942). And Keep Your Powder Dry. Morrow, New York.
Mead, M. (1949). Male and Female. Morrow, New York.
Mead, M. (1959a). Apprenticeship under Boas. Am. Anthropol. Assoc. Memoir 61: 29–45.
Mead, M. (1959b). An Anthropologist at Work. Houghton-Mifflin, Boston.
Mead, M. (1965). The Changing Culture of an Indian Tribe. Capricorn Books, New York.
Mead, M. (1972). Blackberry Winter: My Earlier Years. Simon & Schuster, New York.
Murray, S. O. (1980). The invisibility of scientific scorn. In de Mille, R. (ed.), The Don Juan Papers. Ross-Erikson, Santa Barbara, CA, pp. 188–202.
Murray, S. O. (1981). The professional unpopularity of scientific popularizers. MS.
Murray, S. O. (1983). Historical inferences from ethnohistorical data. J. Hist. Behav. Sci. 19: 335–340.
Murray, S. O. (1988a). W. I. Thomas, behaviorist ethnologist. J. Hist. Behav. Sci. 24: 381–391.
Murray, S. O. (1988b). The reception of anthropological work in American sociology journals, 1921–1951. J. Hist. Behav. Sci. 24: 121–138.
Murray, S. O. (1990). The poverty of “Popperian” history of anthropology. Curr. Anthropol. 31: 401–407.
Murray, S. O. (1991). Boasians and Margaret Mead. Curr. Anthropol. 32: 448–452.
Redfield, R. (1929). Review of Mead (1928). Am. J. Sociology 34: 728–730.
Sapir, E. (1916). Time Perspective in Aboriginal American Culture. Canadian Geological Survey Memoir 90.
Sapir, E. (1917). Do we need a “superorganic”? Am. Anthropol. 18: 327–337.
Sapir, E. (1929). The discipline of sex. Am. Mercury 16: 413–420.
Shankman, P. (1996). The history of Samoan sexual conduct and the Mead–Freeman controversy. Am. Anthropol. 98: 555–567.
Shankman, P. (1998). All things considered. Am. Anthropol. 97: 977–979.
Shankman, P. (2000). Culture, biology, and evolution. The Mead-Freeman controversy revisited. J. Youth Adolesc. 29: 539–556.
Spindler, G. D. (1978). The Makings of Psychological Anthropology. University of California Press, Berkeley.
Stocking, G. W. (1968). Race, Culture and Evolution. Free Press, New York.
Stocking, G. W. (1974). The Shaping of American Anthropology, 1883–1911: A Franz Boas Reader. Basic Books, New York.
Strathern, M. (1983). The punishment of Margaret Mead. Canberra Anthropol. 6: 70–79.
Tanner, J., and Inhelder, B. (1956). Discussions on Child Development. Tavistock, London.
Thomas, W. I. (1909). Sourcebook on Social Origins. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Thomas, W. I. (1923). The Unadjusted Girl. Criminal Science Monographs, Boston.
Weiner, A. (1983). Ethnographic determinism. Am. Anthropol. 85: 909–918.
Whiting, J., and Whiting B. (1978). A strategy for psychocultural research. In Spindler, G. (ed.), The Makings of Psychological Anthropology, University of California Press, Berkeley, pp. 41–61.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Murray, S.O., Darnell, R. Margaret Mead and Paradigm Shifts Within Anthropology During the 1920s. Journal of Youth and Adolescence 29, 557–573 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005118313624
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005118313624