Skip to main content
Log in

Margaret Mead and Paradigm Shifts Within Anthropology During the 1920s

  • Published:
Journal of Youth and Adolescence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The debate between Derek Freeman and the silenced ghost of Margaret Mead remains unintelligible to many readers because of the absence of historicist context for the early work of Mead. Despite Freeman's apparent attention to historical documents, he makes virtually no effort to situate Mead within Boasian anthropology or the interwar years more generally. This paper provides such contexts in terms of the Boasian paradigm of the time and how Mead was understood by her contemporaries. This context dispels the black and white indictment of a disciplinary heroine with feet of clay, and provides the baseline for a more balanced assessment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Allen, J. S. (1989). Franz Boas's physical anthropology. Curr. Anthropol. 30: 79–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, B. (1972). Sociology of Science. Penguin, Baltimore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beals, R., and Hoijer, H. (1953). An Introduction to Anthropology. Macmillan, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boas, F. (1903). Heredity in head form. Am. Anthropol. 5: 530–538.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boas, F. (1912). Changes in Bodily Form of Descendants of Immigrants. Senate Document 208, 61st Congress, Washington.

  • Boas, F. (1940). Race, Language, and Culture. Free Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Côtè, J. E. (1992). Was Mead wrong about coming of age in Samoa? J. Youth Adolesc. 21: 499–527.

    Google Scholar 

  • Côtè, J. E. (1994). Adolescent Storm and Stress. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Côtè, J. E. (2000). Was Coming of Age in Samoa based on a “fateful hoaxing”? Curr. Anthropol. 40: in press.

  • Cressman, L. S. (1988). A Golden Journey. University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darnell, R. (1977). Hallowell's Bear Ceremonialism and the emergence of Boasian anthropology. Ethos 5: 13–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darnell, R. (1990a). Edward Sapir. University of California Press, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darnell, R. (1990b). Franz Boas, Edward Sapir, and the Americanist text tradition. Historiographia Linguistica 17: 129–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darnell, R. (1998a). And Along Came Boas. John Benjamins, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darnell, R. (1998b). Camelot at Yale: The construction and dismantling of the Sapirian synthesis, 1931–39. Am. Anthropol. 100: 361–372

    Google Scholar 

  • Darnell, R. (1999). Theorizing American anthropology: Continuities from the B. A. E. to the Boasians. In Valentine, L., and Darnell, R. (eds.), Theorizing the Americanist Tradition, University ofToronto Press, Toronto, 38–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darnell, R. (2000). Invisible Genealogies. University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, R. B. (1928). The Building of Culture. Scribner's, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, D. (1983). Margaret Mead and Samoa. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, D. (1987). Review of Holmes, Quest for the Real Samoa (1987). J. Polynes. Soc. 96: 392–400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, D. (1991a). Franz Boas and the Samoan researches of Margaret Mead. Curr. Anthropol. 32: 322–330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, D. (1991b). “There's trick i' th' world”: An historical analysis of the Samoan researches of Margaret Mead. Visual Anthropol. Rev. 7: 103–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, D. (1999). The Fateful Hoaxing of Margaret Mead. Westview, Boulder, CO.

  • Handy, E. S. C. (1923). The Native Culture of the Marquesas. Bishop Museum, Honolulu.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hays, T. E. (1997). Sacred texts and introductory texts: The case of Margaret Mead's Samoa. Pacific Stud. 20 (3): 81–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kroeber, A. L. (1915). Eighteen professions. Am. Anthropol. 17: 283–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kroeber, A. L. (1917). The superorganic. Am. Anthropol. 19: 441–447.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kroeber, A. L. (1923). Anthropology. Harcourt, Brace, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kroeber, A. L. (1931). Reviewof Growing up in New Guinea by Margaret Mead (1930). Am. Anthropol. 33: 248–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kroeber, A. L. (1948). Anthropology. Harcourt, Brace, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kroeber, A. L., and Waterman, T. T. (1931). Sourcebook in Anthropology. Harcourt, Brace, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T. S. (1977). The Essential Tension. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (1987). Science in Action. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowie, R. H. (1929). Review of Mead (1928). Am. Anthropol. 29: 532–534.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowie, R. H. (1937). The History of Ethnological Theory. Holt, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowie, R. H. (1940). Native languages as ethnographic tools. Am. Anthropol. 42: 81–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDowell, N. (1984). Review of Freeman (1983). Pacific Stud. 7: 99–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malinowski, B. (1922). Argonauts of the West Pacific. Dutton, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malinowski, B. (1924). Psycho-analysis and anthropology. Psyche 4: 293–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mead, M. (1928). Coming of Age in Samoa. Morrow, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mead, M. (1930). Social Organization of Manu'a. Bishop Museum, Honolulu.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mead, M. (1939). Native languages as fieldwork tools. Am. Anthropol. 41: 189–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mead, M. (1942). And Keep Your Powder Dry. Morrow, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mead, M. (1949). Male and Female. Morrow, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mead, M. (1959a). Apprenticeship under Boas. Am. Anthropol. Assoc. Memoir 61: 29–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mead, M. (1959b). An Anthropologist at Work. Houghton-Mifflin, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mead, M. (1965). The Changing Culture of an Indian Tribe. Capricorn Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mead, M. (1972). Blackberry Winter: My Earlier Years. Simon & Schuster, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, S. O. (1980). The invisibility of scientific scorn. In de Mille, R. (ed.), The Don Juan Papers. Ross-Erikson, Santa Barbara, CA, pp. 188–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, S. O. (1981). The professional unpopularity of scientific popularizers. MS.

  • Murray, S. O. (1983). Historical inferences from ethnohistorical data. J. Hist. Behav. Sci. 19: 335–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, S. O. (1988a). W. I. Thomas, behaviorist ethnologist. J. Hist. Behav. Sci. 24: 381–391.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, S. O. (1988b). The reception of anthropological work in American sociology journals, 1921–1951. J. Hist. Behav. Sci. 24: 121–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, S. O. (1990). The poverty of “Popperian” history of anthropology. Curr. Anthropol. 31: 401–407.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, S. O. (1991). Boasians and Margaret Mead. Curr. Anthropol. 32: 448–452.

    Google Scholar 

  • Redfield, R. (1929). Review of Mead (1928). Am. J. Sociology 34: 728–730.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sapir, E. (1916). Time Perspective in Aboriginal American Culture. Canadian Geological Survey Memoir 90.

  • Sapir, E. (1917). Do we need a “superorganic”? Am. Anthropol. 18: 327–337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sapir, E. (1929). The discipline of sex. Am. Mercury 16: 413–420.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shankman, P. (1996). The history of Samoan sexual conduct and the Mead–Freeman controversy. Am. Anthropol. 98: 555–567.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shankman, P. (1998). All things considered. Am. Anthropol. 97: 977–979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shankman, P. (2000). Culture, biology, and evolution. The Mead-Freeman controversy revisited. J. Youth Adolesc. 29: 539–556.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spindler, G. D. (1978). The Makings of Psychological Anthropology. University of California Press, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stocking, G. W. (1968). Race, Culture and Evolution. Free Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stocking, G. W. (1974). The Shaping of American Anthropology, 18831911: A Franz Boas Reader. Basic Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strathern, M. (1983). The punishment of Margaret Mead. Canberra Anthropol. 6: 70–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanner, J., and Inhelder, B. (1956). Discussions on Child Development. Tavistock, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, W. I. (1909). Sourcebook on Social Origins. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, W. I. (1923). The Unadjusted Girl. Criminal Science Monographs, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, A. (1983). Ethnographic determinism. Am. Anthropol. 85: 909–918.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whiting, J., and Whiting B. (1978). A strategy for psychocultural research. In Spindler, G. (ed.), The Makings of Psychological Anthropology, University of California Press, Berkeley, pp. 41–61.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Murray, S.O., Darnell, R. Margaret Mead and Paradigm Shifts Within Anthropology During the 1920s. Journal of Youth and Adolescence 29, 557–573 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005118313624

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005118313624

Keywords

Navigation