Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Syntax of Features

  • Published:
Journal of Psycholinguistic Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The syntax of features is a complicated and densely researched domain, from a variety of theoretical perspectives. The present paper takes one influential syntactic framework [the minimalist program of Chomsky, 1995] as its vantage point, and discusses the major issues that arise within this framework in the domain of the syntax of features, with particular emphasis on Case and agreement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Ausín, A. (1999). Chinese-type questions in English. WCCFL XVII Proceedings.

  • Babyonyshev, M., & Gibson, E. (1995). Processing overload in Japanese. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics.

  • Beghelli, F., & Stowell, T. (1997). Distributivity and negation. In A. Szabolcsi (ed.), Ways of scope taking. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bejar, S. (1999). Structural markedness and minimalist checking theory. Paper presented at WCCFL 18, Arizona, April 1999.

  • Bennis, H., & Haegeman, L. (1984). On the status of agreement and relative clauses in West-Flemish. In W. de Geest & Y. Putseys (Eds.), Sentential complementation (pp. 33–55). Dordrecht: Foris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bock, K., & Eberhard, K. (1993). Meaning, sound and syntax in English number agreement. Language and Cognitive Processes, 8, 57–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bock, K., & Miller, C. (1991). Broken agreement. Cognitive Psychology, 23, 45–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borer, H. (1984). Parametric syntax. Dordrecht: Foris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boškovič, Ž. (1997). The syntax of non-finite complementation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N. (1955). The logical structure of linguistic theory (Published 1975). New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N. (1986a). Knowledge of language. Its nature, origin and use. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N. (1986b). Barriers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N. (1991). Some notes on economy of derivation and representation. In Robert Freidin (ed.), Principles and parameters in comparative grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N. (1995). The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N. (1998). Minimalist inquiries: The framework. Ms., MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clahsen, H., Bartke, S. & Göllner, S. (1997). Formal features in impaired grammars: A comparison of English and German SLI children. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 10, 151–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elbourne, P. (1999). Some correlations between semantic plurality and quantifier scope. In NELS 29 Proceedings. Amherst: GLSA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, D. (1995). Economy, scope and semantic interpretation. Evidence from VP ellipsis, Ms., MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, D. (1998). Economy and semantic interpretation. Ph.D. Dissertation, MIT.

  • Francis, W. N. (1986). Proximity concord in English. Journal of English Linguistics, 19, 309–318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franks, S. (1999). Clitics at the interface. In F. Beukema, & M. den Dikken (Eds.), Clitic phenomena in European languages (in press). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gazdar, G., Klein, E., Pullum, G., & Sag, I. (1985). Generalized Phrase Structure Grammar. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groat, E., & O'Neil, J. (1996). Spell-Out and the LF interface. In W. Abraham et al. (Eds.), Minimal Ideas (pp. 113–139). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

  • Heim, I., & Kratzer, A. (1998). Semantics in generative grammar. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmberg, A. (1986). Word order and syntactic features in the Scandinavian languages and English. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Stockholm.

  • Jaeggli, O., & Safir, K., (1989). The null subject parameter. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kayne, R. (1989). Notes on English agreement. Ms., CUNY Graduate Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kayne, R. (1998). A note on prepositions and complementisers. Posted on the MIT Press website celebrating Noam Chomsky's 70th birthday.

  • Kimball, J., & Aissen, J. (1971). I think, you think, he think. Linguistic Inquiry, 2, 241–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasnik, H. (1999). On feature strength: Three minimalist approaches to overt movement. Linguistic Inquiry, 30, 197–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lebeaux, D. (1983). A distributional difference between reciprocals and reflexives. Linguistic Inquiry, 14, 723–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mak, P., Vonk, W., & Schriefers, H. (1999). The influence of animacy on the initial parse of Dutch relative clauses. Poster presented at the 12th CUNY Conference on Human Sentence Processing, New York, March, 1999.

  • Meng, M., & Bader, M. (1998). Mode of disambiguation and garden-path strength. An investigation of subject–object ambiguities in German. To appear.

  • Nichols, L. (1999). Anomalous agreement and locality in lexical structure. Ms.

  • Nowak, A. (1999). The role of overt case on parsing in Polish. Poster presented at the 12th CUNY Conference on Human Sentence Processing, New York, March, 1999.

  • Pica, P. (1987). On the nature of the reflexivization cycle. In J. McDonough & B. Plunkett (Eds.), Proceedings of NELS 17. Amherst: GLSA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollard, C., & Sag, I. (1994). Head-driven phrase structure grammar. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollock, J-Y. (1989). Verb movement, Universal Grammar, and the structure of IP. Linguistic Inquiry, 20, 365–424.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radford, A. (1997). Syntactic theory and the structure of English. A minimalist approach. Cambridge: CUP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reid, W. (1991). Verb & noun number in English: A functional explanation. London/New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, N. (1997). What moves where when in which language?. Ph.D. Dissertation, MIT.

  • Roberts, I., & Shlonsky, U. (1996). Pronominal enclisis in VSO languages. In R. Borsley & I. Roberts (Eds.), The syntax of the Celtic languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rohrbacher, B. (1994). The Germanic VO languages and the full paradigm: A theory of V to I raising. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Massachusetts.

  • Schlesewsky, M., & Fanselow, G. (1999). Case features as a trigger for reanalysis. Poster presented at the 12th CUNY Conference on Human Sentence Processing, New York, March, 1999.

  • Strang, B. M. H. (1966). Some features of S-V concord in present-day English. In I. Cellini & G. Melchiori (Eds.), English studies today: Fourth series (pp. 73–87). Rome: Edizioni di Storia e Letteratura.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornton, R., & MacDonald, M. C. (1999). Plausibility effects on subject-verb agreement errors in English. Poster presented at the 12th CUNY Conference on Human Sentence Processing, New York, March, 1999.

  • Wu, A. (1994). The Spell-Out parameters. A minimalist approach to syntax. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of California Los Angeles.

  • Zwart, J-W. (1997). Morphosyntax of verb movement. A minimalist approach to the syntax of Dutch. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Linguistics Program, City University of New York (CUNY), CUNY Graduate Center, 365 Fifth Avenue, New York, New York, 10016-4309

    Marcel den Dikken

Authors
  1. Marcel den Dikken
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

den Dikken, M. The Syntax of Features. J Psycholinguist Res 29, 5–23 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005116221991

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005116221991

Keywords

Search

Navigation