Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Which rectangle?

  • Published:
Public Choice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The rent-seeking analysis is extended to cases where there is a subsidy instead of a government provided monopoly. The case where there are both is also covered. In general the analysis is the same as in cases of monopoly, although there are differences in detail.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Tullock, G. (1959). Problems of majority voting. Journal of Political Economy 67: 571–579.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tullock, G. (1967). The welfare cost of monopoly tariffs and theft. Western Economic Journal 3: 224–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tullock, G. (1997). Where is the rectangle? Public Choice 91: 148–159.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Arizona, McClelland Hall, 4015, Tucson, AZ, 85721-0000, U.S.A.

    Gordon Tullock (Karl Eller Professor of Economics and Political Science)

Authors
  1. Gordon Tullock
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tullock, G. Which rectangle?. Public Choice 96, 405–410 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005068806092

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005068806092

Keywords

Search

Navigation