Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A Very Strong Set Theory?

  • Published:
Studia Logica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Using two distinct membership symbols makes possible to base set theory on one general axiom schema of comprehension. Is the resulting system consistent? Can set theory and mathematics be based on a single axiom schema of comprehension?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fraenkel, A. A., Y. Bar-Hillel, and A. Levy, Foundations of Set Theory, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kisielewicz, A., ‘Double extension set theory’, Reports on Math. Logic 23 (1989), 81–89.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kuratowski, K., and A. Mostowski, Set Theory, PWN, Warszawa, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Quine, W. V., ‘New foundations for mathomatical logic’, Amer. Math. Monthly 44 (1937), 70–80.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Quine, W. V., Mathematical Logic, Cambridge Mass., 1951.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Mathematics, University of Wroclaw, Wroclaw, Poland

    Andrzej Kisielewicz

Authors
  1. Andrzej Kisielewicz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kisielewicz, A. A Very Strong Set Theory?. Studia Logica 61, 171–178 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005048329677

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005048329677

Search

Navigation