Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Reintroducing attitude theory in travel behavior research: The validity of an interactive interview procedure to predict car use

  • Published:
Transportation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A methodological challenge is to develop methods which satisfy the need in transport planning of accurately forecasting travel behavior. Drawing on a review of the current state of attitude theory, it is argued that successfully forecasting travel behavior relies on a distinction between planned, habitual, and impulsive travel. Empirical illustrations are provided in the form of stated-response data from two experiments investigating the validity of an interactive interview procedure to predict household car use for different types of trips, either before or after participants were required to reduce use.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ajzen I (1985) From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior. In: Kuhl J & Beckmann J (eds) Action-Control: From Cognition to Behavior (pp 11-39). Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen I (1987) Attitudes, traits, and actions: Dispositional prediction of behavior in personality and social psychology. In: Berkowitz L (ed) Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol 20 pp 1-63). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen I (1988) Attitudes, Personality, and Behavior. Milton Keyes, UK: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen I (1991) The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 50: 179-211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen I & Fishbein M (1977) Attitude-behavior relations: A theoretical analysis and review of empirical research. Psychological Bulletin 84: 888-918.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen I & Fishbein M (1980) Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen I & Madden TJ (1986) Prediction of goal-directed behavior: Attitudes, intentions, and perceived behavioral control. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 22: 453-474.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bagozzi RP (1992) The self-regulation of attitudes, intentions and behavior. Social Psychology Quarterly 55: 178-204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentler PM & Speckart G (1979) Models of attitude-behavior relations. Psychological Review 86: 452-464.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentler PM & Speckart G (1981) Attitudes “cause” behaviors: A structural equation analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 4: 226-238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawes RM & Smith TL (1985) Attitude and opinion measurement. In: RP Abelson & A Levy (eds) Handbook of Social Psychology (Vol 1 pp 509-566). New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eagly AH & Chaiken S (1993) The Psychology of Attitudes. Fort Worth, FL: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ettema D, Borgers A & Timmermans H (1993) A simulation model of activity scheduling behavior. Transportation Research Record 1493: 101-109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ettema D, Borgers A & Timmermans H (1994) Using interactive computer experiments for identifying scheduling heuristics. Paper presented at the 7th international conference on travel behavior, Valle Nevado, Santiago, Chile.

  • Fishbein M & Ajzen I (1974) Attitudes towards objects as predictors of single and multiple behavior criteria. Psychological Review 81: 59-74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishbein M & Ajzen I (1975) Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fredricks AJ & Dossett DL (1983) Attitude-behavior relations: A comparison of the Fishbein-Ajzen and the Bentler-Speckart models. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 45: 501-512.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gärling T (1992a) Determinants of everyday time allocation. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology 33: 160-169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gärling T (1992b) The importance of routines for the performance of everyday activities. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology 33: 170-177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gärling T & Garvill J (1993) Psychological explanations of participation in everyday activities. In: T Gärling & RG Golledge (eds) Behavior and Environment: Psychological and Geographical Approaches (pp 270-297). Amsterdam: Elsevier/North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gärling T, Ettema D, Gillholm R & Selart M (1995) Towards a theory of the intention-behavior relationship with implications for the prediction of travel behavior. Paper presented at the 7th world conference on transport research, Sydney, Australia.

  • Gärling T & Marell A (1992) Bilhushålls strategier för att reducera bilresande (Households' strategies for reducing automobile travel). Technical Report #2, Transportation Research Unit, Umeå University.

  • Gollwitzer PM (1990) Action phases and mind-sets. In: ET Higgins & RM Sorrentino (eds) Handbook of Motivation and Cognition: Foundations of Social Behavior (Vol 2 pp 3-52). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gollwitzer PM (1993) Goal achievement: The role of intentions. European Review of Social Psychology 4: 141-185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gollwitzer PM & Kinney RF (1989) Effects of deliberative and implemental mind-sets on illusion of control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 56: 531-542.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gollwitzer PM, Heckhausen H & Steller B (1990) Deliberative and implemental mind-sets: Cognitive tuning toward congruous thoughts and information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 59: 1119-1127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golob TF, Horowitz AD & Wachs M (1979) Attitude-behavior relationships in travel demand modelling. In: DA Hensher & PR Stopher (eds) Behavioral Travel Demand Modelling (pp 739-757). London: Croom Helm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin P, Kitamura R & Meurs H (1990) Some principles of dynamic analysis of travel behaviour. In: PM Jones (ed) Developments of Dynamic and Activity-Based Approaches to Travel Analysis (pp 56-72). Aldershot, UK: Gower.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes-Roth B & Hayes-Roth F (1979) A cognitive model of planning. Cognitive Science 3: 275-310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hensher D (1994) Stated preference analysis of travel choices: The state of practice. Transportation 21: 107-133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones P M (1979) HATS: A technique for investigating household decisions. Environment and Planning A 11: 59-70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones P M, Bradley M & Ampt ES (1989) Forecasting household response to policy measures using computerised, activity-based stated preference techniques. In: Travel Behavior Research (pp 41-63). Aldershot, UK: Gower.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koppelman F & Lyon PK (1981) Attitudinal analysis of work/school travel. Transportation Science 15: 233-254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraus SJ (1995) Attitudes and the prediction of behavior: A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 21: 58-75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee-Gosselin M (1989) In-depth research on life style and household car use under future conditions in Canada. In: Travel Behavior Research (pp 102-118). Aldershot, UK: Gower.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee-Gosselin M (1990) The dynamics of car use patterns under different scenarios: A gaming approach. In: PM Jones (ed) Developments of Dynamic and Activity-Based Approaches to Travel Analysis (pp 250-271). Aldershot, UK: Gower.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee-Gosselin M (1996) Scope and potential of Interactive Stated Response data collection methods, in: Household Travel Surveys: New Concepts and Research Needs, Conference Proceedings 10, Transportation Research Board, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin IP & Louviere JJ (1981) Psychological contributions to travel demand modeling. In: I Altman & J Wohlwill (eds) Human Behavior and Environment (Vol 5 pp 29-61). New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Louviere JJ (1988a) Analyzing decision making: Metric conjoint analysis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Louviere JJ (1988b) Conjoint analysis modelling of stated preferences. Journal of Transport Economy and Policy 22: 93-119

    Google Scholar 

  • Netemeyer RG, Burton S & Johnston M (1991) A comparison of two models for the prediction of volitional and goal-directed behaviors: A conformatory analysis approach. Social Psychology Quarterly 54: 87-100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pas E (1990) Is travel demand analysis and modelling in the doldrums? In: PM Jones (ed) Developments of Dynamic and Activity-Based Approaches to Travel Analysis (pp 3-27). Aldershot, UK: Gower.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson AJ, Ampt ES & Meyburg AH (1995) Survey Methods for Transport Planning. Melbourne, Australia: Eucalyptus Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ronis DL, Yates JF & Kirscht JP (1989) Attitudes, decisions, and habits as determinants of repeated behavior. In: AR Pratkanis, SJ Breckler & AG Greenwald (eds) Attitude Structure and Function (pp 213-239). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schifter DE & Ajzen I (1985) Intention, perceived control, and weight loss: An application of the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 49: 843-851.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheppard BH, Hartwick J & Warshaw PR (1988) The theory of reasoned action: A meta-analysis of past research with recommendations for modifications and future research. Journal of Consumer Research 15: 325-343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sudman S & Bradburn NM (1986) Asking Questions: A Practical Guide to Questionnaire Design. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Timmermans HPJ & Golledge R G (1990) Applications of behavioral research on spatial problems II: Preference and choice. Progress in Human Geography 14: 311-354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Triandis HC (1977) Interpersonal Behavior. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verplanken B, Aarts H, Van Knippenberg A & Van Knippenberg C (1994) Attitude versus general habit: Antecedents of travel mode choice. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 24: 285-300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warshaw PR & Davis FD (1985) Disentangling behavioral intention and behavioral expectation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 21: 213-228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wicker AW (1969) Attitudes versus actions: The relationship of verbal and overt behavioral responses to attitude objects. Journal of Social Issues 24: 41-77.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, Göteborg University, Haraldsgatan 1, S-41314, Göteborg, Sweden

    Tommy Gärling, Robert Gillholm & Anita Gärling

Authors
  1. Tommy Gärling
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Robert Gillholm
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Anita Gärling
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gärling, T., Gillholm, R. & Gärling, A. Reintroducing attitude theory in travel behavior research: The validity of an interactive interview procedure to predict car use. Transportation 25, 129–146 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005004311776

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005004311776

Search

Navigation