Skip to main content
Log in

Marginal cost sharing and the Articles of Confederation

  • Published:
Public Choice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Between 1781 and 1789 the American states attempted to share the costs of national, public goods through a system of requisitions. This paper uses a simple public goods analysis to show why rational states would not share costs as intended by the Articles of Confederation. This normative argument illustrates a potential flaw in the constitutional design of the Articles and provides insight into the decline of the American Confederation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Articles of Confederation. Reprinted in R. Ketcham (Ed.) (1986). The Anti-Federalist Papers and the constitutional convention debates. New York: Mentor Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R.H. (1993). Redeeming the Republic. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cain, M. and Dougherty, K. (1995). Suppressing Shays' Rebellion: Collective action and constitutional design under the Articles of Confederation. Mimeo.

  • Ferguson, J. (1961). The power of the purse. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frohlich, N. and Oppenheimer, J. (1978). Modern political economy. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, M. (1970). The Articles of Confederation. Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, M. (1965). The new nation: A history of the United States during the Confederation 1781-1789. New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Journals of the Continental Congress (1910-1937). W.C. Ford (Ed.). Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Letters of Delegates to Congress, 1774-1789 (1976-). P. Smith (Ed.).Washington, DC: Library of Congress.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madison, J. The Papers of James Madison (1977). R. Rutland (Ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin, A. (1969). The Articles of Confederation. In L.W. Levy (Ed.). Essays on the making of the Constitution. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, D. (1989). Public choice II. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, M. (1965). The logic of collective action. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ordeshook, P.C. and Schwartz, T. (1994). The architecture of democracy: Problems of constitutional design in Russia. Mimeo.

  • Papers of the Continental Congress #247, roll 154, item 141. Washington DC: National Archives.

  • Sandler, T. (1992). Collective action: Theory and applications. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stables, W. (1870). Rhode Island in the Continental Congress, 1765-1790. Providence: Providence Printing Co.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dougherty, K.L., Cain, M.J. Marginal cost sharing and the Articles of Confederation. Public Choice 90, 201–213 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004977522762

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004977522762

Keywords

Navigation