Abstract
From the perspective of a supporter, this paper responds to the several criticisms that have been raised to the proposed constitutional amendment to require budget balance. Economists have concentrated on the loss of fiscal flexibility. This objection is countered by reference to the political inefficacy of attempted budgetary manipulation. Lawyers have concentrated on problems of enforcement. This objection is countered by reference to observed respect to other constitutional rules.
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Buchanan, J.M. The balanced budget amendment: Clarifying the arguments. Public Choice 90, 117–138 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004969320944
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004969320944