Skip to main content
Log in

The Environmental Consequences of the Conservation Tillage Adoption Decision in Agriculture in the United States

  • Published:
Water, Air, and Soil Pollution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The environmental consequences of conservation tillage practices are an important issue concerning the impact of agricultural production on the environment. While it is generally recognized that water runoff and soil erosion will decline as no tillage and mulch tillage systems are used more extensively on cropland, what will happen to pesticide and fertilizer use remains uncertain. To gain some insight into this, the conservation tillage adoption decision is modelled. Starting with the assumption that this dicision is a two step procedure – the first is the decision whether or not adopt a conservation tillage production system and the second is the decision on the extent to which conservation tillage should be used – appropriate models of the Cragg and Heckman (dominance) type are estimated. Based on farm-level data on corn production in the United States for 1987, the profile of a farm on which conservation tillage was adopted is that cropland had above average slope and experienced above average rainfall, the farm was a cash grain enterprise, and it had an above average expenditure on pesticides and a below average expenditure on fuel and a below average expenditure on custom pesticide applications. Additionally, for a farm adopting a no tillage production practice, an above average expenditure was made on fertilizer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, J., Dillon, J. and Hardarker, B.: 1977, Agricultural Decision Analysis, The Iowa State University Press, Ames, Iowa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, J. L.: 1980, ‘Agricultural Areas as Nonpoint Sources of Pollution', in M. Overcash and J. Davidson (eds.), Environmental Impact of Nonpoint Source Pollution, Ann Arbor Science Publications, Ann Arbor, MI, pp. 275–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, J. L.: 1987, ‘Hydrologic Effects of Conservation Tillage and Their Importance to Water Quality', in T. Logan, J. Davidson, J. Baker, and M. Overcash (eds.), Effects of Conservation Tillage on Groundwater Quality: Nitrates and Pesticides, Lewis Publishers, Chelsea, MI, pp. 113–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, J. and Johnson, H.: 1979, Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers 22, 554.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumol, W. J.: 1972, Economic Theory and Operations Analysis, Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs. N. J.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blundell, R. and Eghir, C.: 1987, Journal of Econometrics, 33, 179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruce, R., Langdale, G., West, L. and Miller, W.: 1995, Soil Science Society of American Journal 59, 654.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bull, L.: 1993, Residue and Tillage Systems for Field Crops, SR AEGS 9310, Resources and Technology Division, Economic Research Service, U. S. Department of Agriculture, Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chamberlain, G.: 1986, ‘Panel Data', in Handbook of Econometrics, Z. Griliches and M. Intriligator (eds.), North-Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cragg, J.: 1971, Econometrica, 39, 829.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, R. and MacKinnon: 1993, Estimation and Inference in Econometrics, Oxford University Press. Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deaton, A. and Irish, M.: 1986, Journal of Public Economics, 23, 59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dhrymes, P.: 1986, ‘Limited Dependent Variables', in Z. Griliches and M. Intrilligator (eds.), Handbook of Econometrics, North Holland Publishing Company.

  • Dick, W. A. and Daniel, T. C.: 1987, ‘Soil Chemical and Biological Properties as Affected by Conservation Tillage: Environmental Implications', in T. Logan, J. Davidson, J. Baker, M. Overcash (eds.), Effects of Conservation Tillage on Groundwater Quality: Nitrates and Pesticides, Lewis Publishers, Chelsea, MI, pp. 315–339.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diebel, P., Taylor, D., Bartie, S. and Heatwole, C.: 1992, Water Resources Bulletin 28, 755.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diebel, P., Taylor, D. and Batie, S.: 1993, American Journal of Alternative Agriculture 8, 120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobbs, T., Leddy, M. and Smolik, J.: 1988, American Journal of Alternative Agriculture 8, 26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Economic Research Service: 1986, An Economic Analysis of USDA Erosion Control Programs: A New Perspective, AER 560, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Economic Research Service: 1987, Energy and U.S. Agriculture: State and National Fuel Use Tables. AGES861121, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Economic Research Service: 1994, Agricultural Resources and Environmental Indicators, AH 705, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Economic Research Service: 1995, Agricultural Outlook. AO 219, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, W., Shipitalo, M., Owens, L. and Dick, W.: 1993, Journal of Environmental Quality 22, 225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fawcett, R. S.: 1987, ‘Overview of Pest Management for Conservation Tillage Systems', in T. Logan, J. Davidson, J. Baker, and M. Overcash (eds.), Effects of Conservation Tillage on Groundwater Quality: Nitrates and Pesticides, Lewis Publishers, Chelsea, MI, pp. 6–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fawcett, R., Tuerney, D. and Christensen, B.: 1994, Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 49, 49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, W. and Yee, J.: 1995, Journal of Sustainable Agriculture 5, 87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, W.: 1984, Survey Methodology 10, 97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, W. and Hidiroglou, M. A.: Journal of the American Statistical Association 73, 99.

  • Glenn, S. and Angle, J.: 1987, Agricultural Ecosystems and Environment 18, 221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, J., Hartwig, N. and Hoffman, L.: 1984, Journal of Environmental Quality 13, 105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heckman, J. J.: 1979, Econometrica 47, 153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hendrix, P., Parmelee, R., Crossley, D., Coleman, D., Odum, E. and Groffman, P.: 1986, Bioscience 36, 374.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland, P., Parmelee, R., Crossley, D., Coleman, D. C.: 1987, Ecology 68, 425.

    Google Scholar 

  • Intrilligator, M.: 1978, Econometric Models, Techniques, and Applications, Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ismail, I., Blevins, R. and Frye, W.: 1994, Soil Science Society of America Journal 58, 193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kellog, R., Maizel, M. and Goss, D.: 1994, Agricultural Chemical Use and Groundwater Quality: Where Are the Potential Problems, National Center for Resource Innovations, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keeney, R. and Raiffa, H: 1976, Decisions with Multiple Objectives, John Wiley and Sons, Inc., Newe York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, E. S., Forthofer, R.N. and Lorimor, R. J.: 1989, Analyzing Complex Survey Data, Sage University Press, Newbury Park, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, L. and Maddala, G. S.: 1985, International Economic Review 32, 238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipton, K. and Pollack, S.: 1989, A Glossary of Food and Agricultural Policy Terms, Economic research Service, U. S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maddala, G. S.: 1983, Limited Dependent and Qualitative and Variables in Econometrics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council: 1989, Alternative Agriculture, National Academy Press, Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council: 1993, Soil and Water Quality: An Agenda for Agriculture, National Academy Press, Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neumann, J. Von and Morgenstern, O.: 1947, Theory of Games and Economic Bahvior, 2nd ed., Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Office of Technology Assessment: 1986, Technology, Public Policy, and the Changing Structure of American Agriculture, Congress of the United States, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Office of Technology Assessment: 1990, Beneath the Bottom Line: Agricultural Approaches to Reduce Agrichemical Contamination of Groundwater, Congress of the United States, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogg, C.: 1990, Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 45, 45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogg, C.: 1992, Journal of Sustainable Agriculture 2, 113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Onstad, C. and Voorhees, W.: 1987, ‘Hydrologic Soil Parameters Affected by Tillage', in T. Logan, J. Davidson, J. Baker and M. Overcash (eds.), Effects of Conservation Tillage on Groundwater Quality: Nitrates and Pestisides, Lewis Publishers, Chelsea, MI, pp. 274–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, R., Blevins, R., Thomas, G., Frye, W. and Phillips, S.: 1980, Science 208, 1108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pudney, S.: 1989, Medelling Individual Choice: The Econometrics of Corners, Kinks, and Holes. Basil Blackwell, Ltd., London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reicosky, D., Kemper, W., Langdale, G., Douglas, C. and Rasmussen, P.: 1995, Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 50, 253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sander, K., Witt, W. and Barrett, M.: ‘Movement of Triazine Herbicides in Conventional and Conservation Tillage Systems', in D. L. Weigmann (ed.), Pesticides in Terrestrial and Aquatic Environments, Virginia Water Resources Center, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Balcksburg, pp. 378–382.

  • Soil Conservation Service: 1982, National Resource Inventory, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stigler, G.: 1966, The Theory of Price, Macmillan Publishing Company, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, M., Adams, R. and Miller, S.: 1992, Agricultural and Economic Research 17, 173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorne, D.W. and Thorne, M. D.: 1979, Soil, Water and crop Production, AVI Publishing Company, Inc., Westport, Connecticut.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uri, N. D.: 1994, International Journal of Energy Research 18, 783.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uri, N. D. and Day, K.: 1992, Transportation Planning and Technology 16, 221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uri, N. D., and Hyberg, B.: 1990, Water, Air, and Soil Pollut 51, 95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagnet, R. J.: 1987, ‘Processes Influencing Pesticide Loss with Water under Conservation Tillage', in T. Logan, J. Davidson, J. Baker and M. Overcash (eds.), Effects of Conservation Tillage on Groundwater Quality: Nitrates and Pesticides, Lewis Publishers. Chelsea, MI, pp. 189–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wauchope, R. D.: 1987, ‘Effects of Conservation Tillage on pesticide Loss with Water', in T, Logan, J. Davidson, J. Baker and M. Overcash (eds.), Effects of Conservation Tillage on Groundwater Quality: Nitrates and Pesticides, Lewis Publishers, Chelsea, MI, pp. 201–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb, S., Ogg, C. and Huang, W.: 1986, Idling Erodible Cropland: Impacts of Production, Prices, and Government Costs, AER 550, Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wischmeier, W. and Smith, D.: 1978, Predicting Rainfall Erosion Losses — A Guide to Conservation Planning, Agriculture Handbook No. 537, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, C. W., Edwards, J. H. and Cummins, C. G.: 1991, Journal of Sustainable Agriculture 2, 31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zilberman, D. and Marra, M.: 1993, ‘Agricultural Externalities', in G. Carlson, D. Zilberman and J. Miranowski (eds.), Agricultural and Environmental resources Economics, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zinn, J.: 1993, Conservation Compliance: Status and Issues. Congressional Research Service, Washington.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Uri, N.D. The Environmental Consequences of the Conservation Tillage Adoption Decision in Agriculture in the United States. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution 103, 9–34 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004968616527

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004968616527

Navigation