, Volume 111, Issue 3, pp 213–232 | Cite as


  • Eric R. Scerri
  • Lee McIntyre


The philosophy of chemistry has been sadly neglected by most contempory literature in the philosophy of science. This paper argues that this neglect has been unfortunate and that there is much to be learned from paying greater philosophical attention to the set of issues defined by the philosophy of chemistry. The potential contribution of this field to such current topics as reduction, laws, explanation, and supervenience is explored, as are possible applications of insights gained by such study to the philosophy of mind and the philosophy of social science.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Ayala, F.: 1974, in F. Ayala and T. Dobzhansky (eds.), Studies in Philosophy of Biology: Reduction and Related Problems, University of California Press, Berkeley.Google Scholar
  2. Brush, S. J.: 1989, ‘Prediction and Theory Evaluation', Science 246, 1124–1129.Google Scholar
  3. Bunge, M.: 1982, ‘Is Chemistry a Branch of Physics?’ Zeitschrift für allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 13, 209–23.Google Scholar
  4. Cartwright, N.: 1979, ‘Philosophy of Physics', in P. Asquith and H. Kyburg Jr. (eds.), Current Research in Philosophy of Science, Philosophy of Science Association, East Lansing, MI, pp. 381–385.Google Scholar
  5. Gardner, M. R.: 1982, ‘Predicting Novels Facts', British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 33, 1–15.Google Scholar
  6. Handy, N.: 1992, ‘Pople and Boys', Chemistry in Britain 28, 709.Google Scholar
  7. Head-Gordon, M.: 1996, ‘Quantum Chemistry and Molecular Process', Journal of Physical Chemistry 100, 13213–25.Google Scholar
  8. Hettema, H. and T. A. F. Kuipers: 1988, ‘The Periodic Table – Its Formalization, Status, and Relation to Atomic Theory', Erkenntnis 28, 387–408.Google Scholar
  9. Horgan, T. (ed.): 1983, ‘The Spindel Conference 1983: Supervenience', The Southern Journal of Philosophy 22, supplement.Google Scholar
  10. Hull, D.: 1979, ‘Philosophy of Biology', in P. Asquith and H. Kyburg, Jr. (eds.), Current Research in Philosophy of Science, Philosophy of Science Association, East Lansing, MI, pp. 421–435.Google Scholar
  11. Hull, D., M. Forbes, and R. Burian (eds.): 1994, PSA 1994, Vol. 1Philosophy of Science Association, East Lansing, MI.Google Scholar
  12. Kemeney, J. G. and P. Oppenheim: 1956, ‘On Reduction', Philosophical Studies VII, 6–19.Google Scholar
  13. Kim, J.: 1984, ‘Concepts of Supervenience', Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 45, 153–76.Google Scholar
  14. Kim, J.: 1989, ‘Mechanism, Purpose, and Explanatory Exclusion', in J. Tomberlin (ed.), Philosophical Perspectives, Vol. 3, Ridgeview, Atascadero, CA, pp. 77–108.Google Scholar
  15. Lipton, P.: 1990, ‘Prediction and Prejudice', International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 4, 51–65.Google Scholar
  16. Löwdin, P. O.: 1969, ‘Some Comments on the Periodic System of the Elements', International Journal of Quantum Chemistry IIIS, 331–34.Google Scholar
  17. Maher, P.: 1988, ‘Prediction, Accommodation and the Logic of Discovery', in PSA 1988, Vol. 1, Philosophy of East Lansing, MI, pp. 273–85.Google Scholar
  18. McIntyre, L.: 1996, Laws and Explanation in the Social Sciences, Westview Press, Boulder, CO.Google Scholar
  19. Mendeleev, D. I.: 1905, Principles of Chemistry, 3rd English ed., translated from 7th Russian ed. by G. Kemansky, Longmans, Green & Co., London.Google Scholar
  20. Nagel, E.: 1961, The Structure of Science, Harcourt, Brace and World, New York.Google Scholar
  21. Papineau, D.: 1993, Philosophical Naturalism, Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
  22. Primas, H.: 1983, Chemistry, Quantum Mechanics and Reductionism, Springer, Berlin.Google Scholar
  23. Rouvray, D. H.: 1996, ‘The Surprising Periodic Table: Ten Remarkable Facts', Chemical IntelligencerJuly, 39–47.Google Scholar
  24. Scerri, E. R.: 1991, ‘Electronic Configurations, Quantum Mechanics and Reduction', British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 42, 309–25.Google Scholar
  25. Scerri, E. R.: 1991, ‘Chemistry, Spectroscopy and the Question of Reduction', Journal of Chemical Education 68, 122–26.Google Scholar
  26. Scerri, E. R.: 1994, ‘Has Chemistry Been at Least Approximately Reduced to Quantum Mechanics?’ in D. Hull, M. Forbes, and R. Burian (eds.), PSA 1994, Vol. 1, Philosophy of Science Association, East Lansing, MI, pp. 160–70.Google Scholar
  27. Scerri, E. R.: 1995, ‘The Exclusion Principle, Chemistry and Hidden Variables', Synthese 102, 162–69.Google Scholar
  28. Scerri, E. R.: 1996, ‘Stephen Brush, The Periodic Table and the Nature of Chemistry', in P. Jannich and N. Psarros (eds.), Die Sprache der Chemie, Proceedings of the Second Erlenmeyer Colloquium on Philosophy of Chemistry, Köningshausen & Neumann, Würtzburg, pp. 169–176.Google Scholar
  29. Scerri, E. R.: 1997, ‘It All Depends What You Mean by Reduction', in K. Mainzer, A. Müller, and W. Saltzer (eds.), From Simplicity to Complexity, Information, Interaction, Emergence, Proceedings of the 1994 ZiF Meeting in Bielefeld, Vieweg-Verlag (in press).Google Scholar
  30. Scerri, E. R.: forthcoming, ‘The Evolution of the Periodic Table', Scientific American.Google Scholar
  31. Sklar, L.: 1967, ‘Types of Inter-Theoretic Reduction', British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 18, 109–24.Google Scholar
  32. Teller, P.: 1985, ‘Is Supervenience Just Disguised Reduction?', The Southern Journal of Philosophy 23, 93–9.Google Scholar
  33. Weinhold, F.: 1972, ‘Upper and Lower Bounds to Quantum Mechanical Properties', Advances in Quantum Chemistry 6, 299–331.Google Scholar
  34. Woolley, R. G.: 1978, ‘Must a Molecule Have a Shape?', Journal of the American Chemical Society 100, 1073–8.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eric R. Scerri
    • 1
  • Lee McIntyre
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Philosophy and ReligionColgate UniversityHamiltonU.S.A
  2. 2.Division of Humanities and Social SciencesCalifornia Institute of TechnologyPasadenaU.S.A

Personalised recommendations