Abstract
The notion of (deterministic) chaos is frequently used in an increasing number of scientific (as well as non-scientific) contexts, ranging from mathematics and the physics of dynamical systems to all sorts of complicated time evolutions, e.g., in chemistry, biology, physiology, economy, sociology, and even psychology. Despite (or just because of) these widespread applications, however, there seem to fluctuate around several misunderstandings about the actual impact of deterministic chaos on several problems of philosophical interest, e.g., on matters of prediction and computability, and determinism and the free will. In order to clarify these points a survey of the meaning variance of the concept(s) of deterministic chaos, or the various contexts in which it is applied, is given, and its actual epistemological implications are extracted. In summary, it turns out that the various concepts of deterministic chaos do not constitute a “new science”, or a “revolutionary” change of the “scientific world picture”. Instead, chaos research provides a sort of toolbox of methods which are certainly useful for a more detailed analysis and understanding of such dynamical systems which are, roughly speaking, endowed with the property of exponential sensitivity on initial conditions. Such a property, then, implies merely one, but quantitatively strong type of limitation of long-time computability and predictability, respectively.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Adams, E., W. F. Adams, W. Kühn, W. Rufeger, and H. Spreuer: 1993, ,Computational Chaos May Be Due to a Single Local Error', Journal of Computational Physics 104, 241–50.
Agnes, C. and M. Rasetti: 1991, ,Undecidability of the Word Problem and Chaos in Symbolic Dynamics', Il Nuovo Cimento 106B, 879–907.
Alekseev, V.M. and M. V. Yakobson: 1981, ,Symbolic Dynamics and Hyperbolic Dynamic Systems', Physics Reports 75, 287–325.
Arnold, V. I. and A. Avez: 1968, Ergodic Problems of Classical Mechanics, W. A. Benjamin, New York.
Banks, J., J. Brooks, G. Cairns, G. Davis, and P. Stacey: 1992, ,On Devaney's Definition of Chaos', American Mathematical Monthly 99, 332–34.
Başar, E. (ed.): 1990, Chaos in Brain Function, Springer, Berlin.
Başar, E. and G. Roth: 1996, ,Ordnung aus dem Chaos: Kooperative Gehirnprozesse bei kognitiven Leistungen', in Küppers, pp. 290–322.
Batterman, R. W.: 1991a, ,Randomness and Probability in Dynamical Theories: On the Proposals of the Prigogine School', Philosophy of Science 58, 241–63.
Batterman, R. W.: 1991b, ,Chaos, Quantization, and the Correspondence Principle', Synthese 89, 189–227.
Batterman, R. W.: 1993, ,Defining Chaos', Philosophy of Science 60, 43–66.
Batterman, R. W.: 1996, ,Chaos: Algorithmic Complexity vs. Dynamical Instability', in Weingartner and Schurz, pp. 211–35.
Bennetin, G., L. Galgani, A. Giorgilli, and J.-M. Strelcyn: 1984, ,A Proof of Kolmogorov's Theoremon Invariant Tori Using Canonical Transformations Defined by the Lie Method', Il Nuovo Cimento 79, 201–23.
Blum, L., M. Shub, and S. Smale: 1989, ,On a Theory of Computation and Complexity over the Real Numbers: NPCompleteness, Recursive Functions and Universal Machines', Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society 21, 1–46.
Buzug, T.: 1994, Analyse chaotischer Systeme, B.I.-Wissenschaftsverlag, Mannheim.
Casati, G. and B. Chirikov (eds.): 1995, Quantum Chaos. Between Order and Disorder, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Costa, N. C. A. da and F. A. Doria: 1995, ,Gödel Incompleteness, Explicit Expressions for Complete Arithmetic Degrees and Applications', Complexity 1, 1–16.
Coven, E., I. Kan, and J. A. Yorke: 1988, ,PseudoOrbit Shadowing in the Family of Tent Maps', Transactions of the American Mathematical Society 308, 227–41.
Dürr, D., S. Goldstein, and N. Zanghi: 1992, ,Quantum Chaos, Classical Randomness, and Bohmian Mechanics', Journal of Statistical Physics 68, 259–70.
Düsberg, K. J.: 1995, ,Deterministisches Chaos: Emige wissenschaftstheoretisch interessante Aspekte', Journal for General Philosophy of Science 26, 11–24. Duke, D. and W. Pritchard (eds.): 1991, Measuring Chaos in the Human Brain, World Scientific, Singapore.
Elbert, T., W. Lutzenberger, B. Rockstroh, P. Berg, and R. Cohen: 1992, ,Physical Aspects of the EEG in Schizophrenics', Biological Psychiatry 32, 595–606.
Fabian, T. and M. Stadler: 1992, ,Applying Chaos Theory to Delinquent Behavior on Psychosocial Stress Situations', in: F. Lösel, D. Bender, and T. Bliesner (eds.), Psychology and Law, de Gruyter, Berlin, pp. 55–61.
Haken, H.: 1983, Synergetics: An Introduction. Nonequilibrium Phase Transitions and SelfOrganization in Physics, Chemistry, and Biology, Springer, Berlin.
Kruse, P., M. Stadler, B. Pavlekovic, and V. Gheorghiu: 1992, ,Instability and Cognitive Order Formation: Self Organization Principles, Psychological Experiments, and Psychotherapeutic Interventions', in: W. Tschacher, G. Schiepek, and E. J. Brunner (eds.), Selforganization and Clinical Psychology, Springer, Berlin, pp. 102–17.
Küppers, G. (ed.): 1996, Chaos und Ordnung. Formen der Selbstorganisation in Natur und Gesellschaft, Reclam, Stuttgart.
Leiber, T.: 1996a, Kosmos, Kausalität und Chaos. Naturphilosophische, erkenntnistheoretische und wissenschaftstheoretische Perspektiven, Ergon Verlag, Würzburg.
Leiber, T.: 1996b, ,Chaos, Berechnungskomplexität und Physik: Neue Grenzen wissenschaftlicher Erkenntnis?', Philosophia Naturalis 33, 23–54.
Li, T.-Y. and J. Yorke: 1975, ,Period Three Implies Chaos', American Mathematical Monthly 82, 985–92.
Lichtenberg, A. J. and M. A. Liebermann: 1983, Regular and Stochastic Motion, Springer, New York.
Lorenz, E. N.: 1989, ,Computational Chaos – A Prelude to Computational Instability', Physica D35, 299–317.
Mainzer, K.: 1997a, Thinking in Complexity. The Complex Dynamics of Matter, Mind and Mankind, (3rd ed.) Springer, Berlin.
Mainzer, K.: 1997b, Gehirn, Computer, Komplexität, Springer, Berlin.
Monteiro, T. S.: 1994, ,Chaos in Atomic Physics', Contemporary Physics 35, 311–27.
Moreh, J.: 1994, ,Randomness, Game Theory and Free Will', Erkenntnis 41, 49–64.
Nicolis, G.: 1996, ,Natural Laws and the Physics of Complex Systems', in Weingartner and Schurz, pp. 36–9.
O'Connor, P., S. Tomsovic, and E. J. Heller: 1992, ,Semiclassical Dynamics in the Strongly Chaotic Regime: Breaking the Log Time Barrier', Physica D55, 340–57.
Ornstein, D. S.: 1974, Ergodic Theory, Randomness, and Dynamical Systems, Yale University Press, New Haven.
Ornstein, D. S. and B. Weiss: 1991, ,Statistical Properties of Chaotic Systems', Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society 24, 11–116.
Peitgen, H.-O., H. Jürgens, and D. Saupe: 1992, Bausteine desChaos – Fraktale, KlettCotta and Springer, Stuttgart and Berlin.
Peitgen, H.-O., H. Jürgens, and D. Saupe: 1994, Chaos – Bausteine der Ordnung, KlettCotta and Springer, Stuttgart and Berlin.
PourEl, M. B. and J. I. Richards: 1989, Computability in Analysis and Physics, Springer, Berlin.
Shields, P.: 1973, The Theory of Bernoulli Shifts, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Skarda, C. and W. Freedman: 1987, ,How the Brain Makes Chaos in Order to Make Sense of the World', Behavioral and Brain Sciences 10, 161–95.
Tabor, M.: 1989, Chaos and Integrability in Nonlinear Dynamics. An Introduction, John Wiley, New York.
Thomas, H. and T. Leiber: 1994, ,Determinismus und Chaos in der Physik', in: K. Mainzer, W. Schirmacher (Hrsg.), Quanten, Chaos und Dämonen. Erkenntnistheoretische Aspekte der modernen Physik, B.I.-Wissenschaftsverlag, Mannheim, pp. 147–207.
Verstraeten, G.: 1991, ,Some Critical Remarks Concerning Prigogine's Conception of Temporal Irreversibility', Philosophy of Science 58, 639–54.
Weingartner, P. and G. Schurz (eds.): 1996, Law and Prediction in the Light of Chaos Research, Lecture Notes in Physics, Vol. 273, Springer, Berlin.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Leiber, T. On the Actual Impact of Deterministic Chaos. Synthese 113, 357–379 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004944713074
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004944713074