Skip to main content
Log in

Why only Nixon could go to China

  • Published:
Public Choice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Right-wing politicians sometimes can implement policies that left-wing politicians cannot, and vice versa. Contemporary wisdom has it that “only Nixon could have gone to China”. We develop a model to explain this phenomenon. A policy issue could depend on information, on which every one could potentially agree on policy, or on values, on which agreement is impossible. Politicians, who value both reelection and policy outcomes, realize the nature of the issue, whereas voters do not. Only a right-wing president can credibly signal the desirability of a left-wing course of action. The Nixon paradox can hold then if citizens vote retrospectively on the issue.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aitken, J. (1993). Nixon: A life. Washington DC: Regnery Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alesina, A. and Cukierman, A. (1990). The Politics of Ambiguity. Quarterly Journal of Economics105: 829-850.

    Google Scholar 

  • Austen-Smith, D. and Banks, J. (1989). Electoral accountability and incumbency. In P. Ordeshook (Ed.), Models of strategic choice in politics. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coate, S. and Morris, S. (1995). On the form of transfers to special interests. Journal of Political Economy103: 1210-1235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cukierman, A. and Tommasi, M. (1995). When does it take a Nixon to go to China? Unpublished manuscript.

  • Farrell, J. and Gibbons, R. (1989). Cheap talk with two audiences. American Economic Review79: 1214-1223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrington, J.E. (1992). The revelation of information through the electoral process: An explanatory analysis. Economics and Politics4: 255-275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuran, T. (1989). Sparks and prairie fires: A theory of unanticipated political revolution. Public Choice61: 41-74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, D.W. (1987). Candidate behavior under mixed motives. Social Choice and Welfare4: 153-160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reed, W.R. and Cho, J. (1996). A comparison of prospective and retrospective voting. Public Choice, forthcoming.

  • Wittman, D. (1983). Candidate motivation: A synthesis of alternative theories. American Political Science Review77: 142-157.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cowen, T., Sutter, D. Why only Nixon could go to China. Public Choice 97, 605–615 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004907414530

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004907414530

Keywords

Navigation