A neo-Downsian model of group-oriented voting and racial backlash

Abstract

We extend the standard Downsian framework to suppose that voters consider the identity of each candidate's supporters when deciding whom to support, rather than considering only the announced policy positions of the candidates. In particular we posit the existence of a class of voters whose support for a candidate reduces support by some other voters for that candidate. Our most important result concerns the conditions under which the addition to the electorate of new voters on one side of the policy spectrum shifts the equilibrium toward the opposite direction. The model can explain why enfranchisement of blacks did not immediately help the election of liberal candidates.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Aldrich, J. H. (1983). A Downsian spatial model with party activism. American Political Science Review 77: 974–990.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Alesina, A. and Rosenthal, H. (1993). Partisan politics: Divided government. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Alt, J. (1994). Race and voter registration in the South. In C. Davidson and B. Grofman, Quiet revolution in the South: The impact of the Voting Rights Act. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Aranson, P. and Ordeshook, P. C. (1972). Spatial strategy for sequential elections. In R.G. Niemi and H.F. Weisberg (Eds.), Probability models of collective decision making. Columbus OH: Merrill.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Baron, D. D. (1994). Electoral competition with informed and uninformed voters. American Political Science Review 88: 33–47.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Black, E. and Black, M. (1992). The vital South: How presidents are elected. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Brennan, G. and Lomasky, L. (1994). Democracy and decision: The pure theory of electoral preference. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Carmines, E. G. and Stimson, J. A. (1989). Issue evolution: Race and the transformation of American politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Downs, A. (1957). An economic theory of democracy. New York: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Fenno, R. F. (1978). Home style: House members in the their districts. Boston: Little Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Glazer, A. (1993). Political equilibrium under group identification. In B. Grofman (Ed.), Information, participation and choice. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Grofman, B. (1982). A dynamic model of protocoalition formation in ideological N-space. Behavioral Science 27: 77–90.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Grofman, B. (1993). Toward an institution-rich theory of political competition with a supply side component. In B. Grofman (Ed.), Information, participation and choice. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Grofman, B. and Handley, L. (1995). Racial context, the 1968 Wallace vote, and southern presidential dealignment: Evidence from North Carolina and elsewhere. In M. Eagles (Ed.), Spatial and contextual models in political research. London: Taylor and Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Grofman, B., Griffin, R. and Glazer, A. (1990). Identical geography, different constituencies, see what a difference party makes. In R.J. Johnston, F. Shelley, and P. Taylor (Eds.), Developments in electoral geography, 207–217. London: Croom Helm.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Grofman, B., Griffin, R. and Glazer, A. 91992). The effects of black population on electing Democrats and liberals to the House of Representatives. Legislative Studies Quarterly 17: 365–379.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Huckfeldt, R. and Kohfeld, C. (1989). Race and the decline of class in American politics. Champaign-Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Keech, W. R. (1968). The impact of Negro voting: The vote in the quest for equality. Chicago: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Key, V. O. Jr. (1949). Southern politics. New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Lodge, M., Moskowitz, D., Pfau, M. and Ramachandran, S. (1985). Discriminating tweedledum from tweedledee: Perceived party preferences as a function of social class and racial differences. Prepared for delivery at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, New Orleans, August.

  21. Lodge, M., Moskowitz, D., Pfau, M. and Wahlke, J. (1986). Race and class components of party differences: An experiment in political information processing. Unpublished manuscript. Laboratory for Behavioral Research, State University of New York at Stony Brook.

  22. McConahay, J. B. (1982). Self-interest versus racial attitudes as correlates of anti-busing attitudes in Louisville: Is it the buses or the blacks? Journal of Politics 44: 692–720.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Poole, K. and Rosenthal, H. (1984). A spatial model for legislative roll-call analysis. American Journal of Political Science 29: 357–384.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Sears, D. O., Hensler, C. P. and Speer, L. K. (1979). White's opposition to busing: Self-interest or symbolic politics? American Political Science Review 73: 369–384.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Sears, D. O. and Kinder, D. (1971). Racial tensions and voting in Los Angeles. In W.Z. Hirsch (Ed.), Los Angeles: Viability and prospects for metropolitan leadership. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Wittman, D. (1977). Candidates with policy preferences: A dynamic model. Journal of Economic Theory 14: 180–189.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Wittman, D. (1983). Candidate motivation: A synthesis of alternative theories. American Political Science Review 72: 78–90.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Wright, G. C. (1977). Contextual models of electoral behavior: The southern Wallace vote. American Political Science Review 71: 497–508.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Glazer, A., Grofman, B. & Owen, G. A neo-Downsian model of group-oriented voting and racial backlash. Public Choice 97, 23–34 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004906708125

Download citation

Keywords

  • Opposite Direction
  • Public Finance
  • Policy Position
  • Policy Spectrum
  • Liberal Candidate