Skip to main content
Log in

Isolation and Non-Arbitrary Division: Frege's Two Criteria for Counting

  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In §54 of the Grundlagen, Frege advances an interesting proposal on how to distinguish among different sorts of concepts, only some of which he thinks can be associated with number. This paper is devoted to an analysis of the two criteria he offers, isolation and non-arbitrary division. Both criteria say something about the way in which a concept divides its extension; but they emphasize different aspects. Isolation ensures that a concept divides its extension into discrete units. I offer two construals of this: isolation as discreteness, i.e. absence of overlap, between the objects to be counted; and isolation as the drawing of conceptual boundaries. Non-arbitrary division concerns the internal structure of the units we count: it makes sure that we cannot go on dividing them arbitrarily and still find more units of the kind. Non-arbitrary division focuses not only on how long something can be divided into parts of the same kind; it also speaks to the way in which these divisions are made, arbitrarily or non-arbitrarily, as well as to the compositional structure of the objects divided.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Bunt, H. C.: 1979, 'Ensembles and the Formal Semantic Properties of Mass Terms', in Francis Jeffry Pelletier (ed.), Mass Terms: Some Philosophical Problems, D. Reidel Publishing Co., Dordrecht, Holland, pp. 249–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunt, H. C.: 1985, Mass Terms and Model-Theoretic Semantics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burge, T.: 1972, 'Truth and Mass Terms', The Journal of Philosophy LXIX, 263–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burge, T.: 1975, 'Mass Terms, Count Nouns and Changec', Synthese 31, 459–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cartwright, R.: 1994a, 'Notes on Aquinas' Metaphysics', unpublished manuscript, draft of September 1994.

  • Cartwright, R.: 1994b, 'Speaking of Everything', Nous 28, 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cartwright, H. M.: 1963, Classes, Quantities and Non-Singular Reference, unpubl. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cartwright, H. M.: 1965, 'Heraclitus and the Bath Water', Philosophical Review 74, 466–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cartwright, H. M.: 1970, 'Quantities', Philosophical Review 79, 25–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cartwright, H. M.: 1975a, 'Some Remarks About Mass Nouns and Plurality', Synthese 31, 395–410.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cartwright, H. M.: 1975b, 'Amounts and Measures of Amounts', Nous 9, 143–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, C. Y.: 1973, 'Response to Moravcsik', in J. Hintikka et al. (eds.), Approaches to Natural Language, D. Reidel Publishing Co., Dordrecht, Holland, pp. 286–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cocchiarella, N.: 1976, 'On the Logic of Natural Kinds', Philosophy of Science 43, 202–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dummett, M.: 1973, Frege: Philosophy of Language, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dummett, M.: 1981, The Interpretation of Frege's Philosophy, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dummett, M.: 1991, Frege: Philosophy of Mathematics, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frege, G.: 1980, The Foundations of Arithmetic, transl. by J. L. Austin, Northwestern University Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geach, P. T.: 1962, Reference and Generality, Cornell University Press, Cornell, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geach, P. T.: 1973, 'Ontological Relativity and Relative Identity”, in Milton Munitz (ed.), Logic and Ontology, NYU Press, pp. 287–302.

  • Gillon, B. S.: 1992, 'Towards a Common Semantics for English Count and Mass Nouns', Linguistics and Philosophy 15, 597–639.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, N.: 1951, The Structure of Appearance, D. Reidel Publishing Co., Dordrecht, Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Heijenoort, J.: 1986, 'Frege and Vagueness', in L. Haaparanta and J. Hintikka (eds.), Frege Synthesized, D. Reidel Publishing Co., Dordrecht, Holland, pp. 31–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higginbotham, J.: 1994, 'Mass and Count Quantifiers', Linguistics and Philosophy 17, 447–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, M.: 1992, 'Constitution Is Not Identity', Mind 101, 89–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koslicki, K.: 1995, Talk about Stuffs and Things: The Logic of Mass and Count Nouns, unpubl. Ph.D. Thesis, MIT.

  • Koslicki, K.: 1997a, 'The Semantics of Mass-Predicates', unpubl. manuscript.

  • Koslicki, K.: 1997b, 'Homogeneity and the Problem of Minimal Parts', unpubl. manuscript.

  • Landman, F.: 1991, Structures for Semantics, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laycock, H.: 1972, 'Some Questions of Ontology', Philosophical Review 81, 3–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laycock, H.: 1975, 'Theories of Matter', Synthese 31, 411–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leonard, H. S. and N. Goodman: 1940, 'The Calculus of Individuals and Its Uses', Journal of Symbolic Logic 5, 45–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Link, G: 1983, 'The Logical Analysis of Plurals and Mass Terms: A Lattice-Theoretical Approach', in R. Bäuerle et al. (eds.), Meaning, Use and Interpretation of Language, De Gruyter, Berlin, pp. 302–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lønning, J. T.: 1987, 'Mass Terms and Quantification', Linguistics and Philosophy 10, 1–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moravcsik, J.: 1973, 'Mass Terms in English', in J. Hintikka et al. (eds.), Approaches to Natural Language, D. Reidel Publishing Co., Dordrecht, Holland, pp. 263–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pelletier, F. J.: 1975, 'Non-Singular Reference: Some Preliminaries', Philosophia 5, 451–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pelletier, F. J. (ed.): 1979, Mass Terms: Some Philosophical Problems, D. Reidel Publishing Co., Dordrecht, Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pelletier, F. J. and L.K. Schubert: 1989, 'Mass Expressions', in D. Gabbay and F. Guenthner (eds.), Handbook of Philosophical Logic, D. Reidel Publishing Co., Dordrecht, Holland, pp. 327–407.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quine, W. v. O.: 1960, Word and Object, M.I.T. Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roeper, P.: 1983, 'Semantics for Mass Terms with Quantifiers', Nous 17, 251–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • ter Meulen, A.: 1981, 'An Intensional Logic for Mass Terms', Philosophical Studies 40, 105–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharvy, R.: 1978, 'Maybe English Has No Count Nouns: Notes on Chinese Semantics; An Essay in Metaphysics and Linguistics', Studies in Language 2, 345–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharvy, R.: 1979, 'The Indeterminacy of Mass Predication', in Francis Jeffry Pelletier (ed.), Mass Terms: Some Philosophical Problems, D. Reidel Publishing Co., Dordrecht, Holland, pp. 47–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simons, P.: 1982, 'Three Essays in Formal Ontology', in Barry Smith (ed.), Parts and Moments, Studies in Logic and Formal Ontology, Philosophia Verlag, Munich, pp. 111–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stalnaker, R.: 1988, 'Vague Identity', in D. F. Austin (ed.), Philosophical Analysis, Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 349–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, J.: 1987, “Why Potentiality Matters”, Canadian Journal of Philosophy 17, 815–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strawson, P. F.: 1953/54, 'Particular and General', Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society LIV, 233–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ware, R. X.: 1975, 'Some Bits and Pieces', Synthese 31, 379–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiggins, D.: 1980, Sameness and Substance, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, T.: 1994, Vagueness, Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, D.W.: 1995, 'Theories of Masses and Problems of Constitution', Philosophical Review 104, 53–110.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Koslicki, K. Isolation and Non-Arbitrary Division: Frege's Two Criteria for Counting. Synthese 112, 403–430 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004903625876

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004903625876

Keywords

Navigation