Skip to main content

Isolation and Non-Arbitrary Division: Frege's Two Criteria for Counting

Abstract

In ยง54 of the Grundlagen, Frege advances an interesting proposal on how to distinguish among different sorts of concepts, only some of which he thinks can be associated with number. This paper is devoted to an analysis of the two criteria he offers, isolation and non-arbitrary division. Both criteria say something about the way in which a concept divides its extension; but they emphasize different aspects. Isolation ensures that a concept divides its extension into discrete units. I offer two construals of this: isolation as discreteness, i.e. absence of overlap, between the objects to be counted; and isolation as the drawing of conceptual boundaries. Non-arbitrary division concerns the internal structure of the units we count: it makes sure that we cannot go on dividing them arbitrarily and still find more units of the kind. Non-arbitrary division focuses not only on how long something can be divided into parts of the same kind; it also speaks to the way in which these divisions are made, arbitrarily or non-arbitrarily, as well as to the compositional structure of the objects divided.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

REFERENCES

  • Bunt, H. C.: 1979, 'Ensembles and the Formal Semantic Properties of Mass Terms', in Francis Jeffry Pelletier (ed.), Mass Terms: Some Philosophical Problems, D. Reidel Publishing Co., Dordrecht, Holland, pp. 249โ€“277.

    Google Scholarย 

  • Bunt, H. C.: 1985, Mass Terms and Model-Theoretic Semantics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholarย 

  • Burge, T.: 1972, 'Truth and Mass Terms', The Journal of Philosophy LXIX, 263โ€“82.

    Google Scholarย 

  • Burge, T.: 1975, 'Mass Terms, Count Nouns and Changec', Synthese 31, 459โ€“78.

    Google Scholarย 

  • Cartwright, R.: 1994a, 'Notes on Aquinas' Metaphysics', unpublished manuscript, draft of September 1994.

  • Cartwright, R.: 1994b, 'Speaking of Everything', Nous 28, 1โ€“20.

    Google Scholarย 

  • Cartwright, H. M.: 1963, Classes, Quantities and Non-Singular Reference, unpubl. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.

    Google Scholarย 

  • Cartwright, H. M.: 1965, 'Heraclitus and the Bath Water', Philosophical Review 74, 466โ€“85.

    Google Scholarย 

  • Cartwright, H. M.: 1970, 'Quantities', Philosophical Review 79, 25โ€“42.

    Google Scholarย 

  • Cartwright, H. M.: 1975a, 'Some Remarks About Mass Nouns and Plurality', Synthese 31, 395โ€“410.

    Google Scholarย 

  • Cartwright, H. M.: 1975b, 'Amounts and Measures of Amounts', Nous 9, 143โ€“64.

    Google Scholarย 

  • Cheng, C. Y.: 1973, 'Response to Moravcsik', in J. Hintikka et al. (eds.), Approaches to Natural Language, D. Reidel Publishing Co., Dordrecht, Holland, pp. 286โ€“88.

    Google Scholarย 

  • Cocchiarella, N.: 1976, 'On the Logic of Natural Kinds', Philosophy of Science 43, 202โ€“22.

    Google Scholarย 

  • Dummett, M.: 1973, Frege: Philosophy of Language, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholarย 

  • Dummett, M.: 1981, The Interpretation of Frege's Philosophy, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholarย 

  • Dummett, M.: 1991, Frege: Philosophy of Mathematics, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholarย 

  • Frege, G.: 1980, The Foundations of Arithmetic, transl. by J. L. Austin, Northwestern University Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholarย 

  • Geach, P. T.: 1962, Reference and Generality, Cornell University Press, Cornell, NY.

    Google Scholarย 

  • Geach, P. T.: 1973, 'Ontological Relativity and Relative Identityโ€, in Milton Munitz (ed.), Logic and Ontology, NYU Press, pp. 287โ€“302.

  • Gillon, B. S.: 1992, 'Towards a Common Semantics for English Count and Mass Nouns', Linguistics and Philosophy 15, 597โ€“639.

    Google Scholarย 

  • Goodman, N.: 1951, The Structure of Appearance, D. Reidel Publishing Co., Dordrecht, Holland.

    Google Scholarย 

  • van Heijenoort, J.: 1986, 'Frege and Vagueness', in L. Haaparanta and J. Hintikka (eds.), Frege Synthesized, D. Reidel Publishing Co., Dordrecht, Holland, pp. 31โ€“45.

    Google Scholarย 

  • Higginbotham, J.: 1994, 'Mass and Count Quantifiers', Linguistics and Philosophy 17, 447โ€“80.

    Google Scholarย 

  • Johnston, M.: 1992, 'Constitution Is Not Identity', Mind 101, 89โ€“105.

    Google Scholarย 

  • Koslicki, K.: 1995, Talk about Stuffs and Things: The Logic of Mass and Count Nouns, unpubl. Ph.D. Thesis, MIT.

  • Koslicki, K.: 1997a, 'The Semantics of Mass-Predicates', unpubl. manuscript.

  • Koslicki, K.: 1997b, 'Homogeneity and the Problem of Minimal Parts', unpubl. manuscript.

  • Landman, F.: 1991, Structures for Semantics, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Holland.

    Google Scholarย 

  • Laycock, H.: 1972, 'Some Questions of Ontology', Philosophical Review 81, 3โ€“42.

    Google Scholarย 

  • Laycock, H.: 1975, 'Theories of Matter', Synthese 31, 411โ€“42.

    Google Scholarย 

  • Leonard, H. S. and N. Goodman: 1940, 'The Calculus of Individuals and Its Uses', Journal of Symbolic Logic 5, 45โ€“55.

    Google Scholarย 

  • Link, G: 1983, 'The Logical Analysis of Plurals and Mass Terms: A Lattice-Theoretical Approach', in R. Bรคuerle et al. (eds.), Meaning, Use and Interpretation of Language, De Gruyter, Berlin, pp. 302โ€“23.

    Google Scholarย 

  • Lรธnning, J. T.: 1987, 'Mass Terms and Quantification', Linguistics and Philosophy 10, 1โ€“52.

    Google Scholarย 

  • Moravcsik, J.: 1973, 'Mass Terms in English', in J. Hintikka et al. (eds.), Approaches to Natural Language, D. Reidel Publishing Co., Dordrecht, Holland, pp. 263โ€“85.

    Google Scholarย 

  • Pelletier, F. J.: 1975, 'Non-Singular Reference: Some Preliminaries', Philosophia 5, 451โ€“65.

    Google Scholarย 

  • Pelletier, F. J. (ed.): 1979, Mass Terms: Some Philosophical Problems, D. Reidel Publishing Co., Dordrecht, Holland.

    Google Scholarย 

  • Pelletier, F. J. and L.K. Schubert: 1989, 'Mass Expressions', in D. Gabbay and F. Guenthner (eds.), Handbook of Philosophical Logic, D. Reidel Publishing Co., Dordrecht, Holland, pp. 327โ€“407.

    Google Scholarย 

  • Quine, W. v. O.: 1960, Word and Object, M.I.T. Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholarย 

  • Roeper, P.: 1983, 'Semantics for Mass Terms with Quantifiers', Nous 17, 251โ€“65.

    Google Scholarย 

  • ter Meulen, A.: 1981, 'An Intensional Logic for Mass Terms', Philosophical Studies 40, 105โ€“25.

    Google Scholarย 

  • Sharvy, R.: 1978, 'Maybe English Has No Count Nouns: Notes on Chinese Semantics; An Essay in Metaphysics and Linguistics', Studies in Language 2, 345โ€“65.

    Google Scholarย 

  • Sharvy, R.: 1979, 'The Indeterminacy of Mass Predication', in Francis Jeffry Pelletier (ed.), Mass Terms: Some Philosophical Problems, D. Reidel Publishing Co., Dordrecht, Holland, pp. 47โ€“61.

    Google Scholarย 

  • Simons, P.: 1982, 'Three Essays in Formal Ontology', in Barry Smith (ed.), Parts and Moments, Studies in Logic and Formal Ontology, Philosophia Verlag, Munich, pp. 111โ€“260.

    Google Scholarย 

  • Stalnaker, R.: 1988, 'Vague Identity', in D. F. Austin (ed.), Philosophical Analysis, Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 349โ€“60.

    Google Scholarย 

  • Stone, J.: 1987, โ€œWhy Potentiality Mattersโ€, Canadian Journal of Philosophy 17, 815โ€“30.

    Google Scholarย 

  • Strawson, P. F.: 1953/54, 'Particular and General', Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society LIV, 233โ€“60.

    Google Scholarย 

  • Ware, R. X.: 1975, 'Some Bits and Pieces', Synthese 31, 379โ€“93.

    Google Scholarย 

  • Wiggins, D.: 1980, Sameness and Substance, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholarย 

  • Williamson, T.: 1994, Vagueness, Routledge, London.

    Google Scholarย 

  • Zimmerman, D.W.: 1995, 'Theories of Masses and Problems of Constitution', Philosophical Review 104, 53โ€“110.

    Google Scholarย 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Koslicki, K. Isolation and Non-Arbitrary Division: Frege's Two Criteria for Counting. Synthese 112, 403โ€“430 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004903625876

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004903625876

Keywords

  • Internal Structure
  • Compositional Structure
  • Discrete Unit
  • Conceptual Boundary