Synthese

, Volume 111, Issue 3, pp 233–251 | Cite as

MOLECULAR SHAPE, REDUCTION, EXPLANATION AND APPROXIMATE CONCEPTS

  • Jeffry L. Ramsey
Article

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Amman, A.: 1993, ‘The Gestalt Problem in Quantum Theory: Generation of Molecular Shape by the Environment', Synthese 97, 124–156.Google Scholar
  2. Berry, R. S.: 1960, ‘Time-Dependent Measurements and Molecular Structure: Ozone', Reviews of Modern Physics 32, 447–454Google Scholar
  3. Berry, R. S.: 1980, ‘A Generalized Phenomenology for Small Clusters, However Floppy', in R. G. Woolley (ed.), Quantum Dynamics of Molecules: The New Experimental Challenge to Theorists, Plenum Press, New York.Google Scholar
  4. Bohm, D. and B. Hiley: 1993, The Undivided Universe: An Ontological Interpretation of Quantum Theory, Routledge, London.Google Scholar
  5. Claverie and Diner: 1980, ‘The Concept of Molecular Structure in Quantum Theory: Interpretation Problems', Israel Journal of Chemistry 19, 54–81.Google Scholar
  6. Churchland, P.: 1979, Scientific Realism and the Plasticity of Mind, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  7. Churchland, P. and P. Churchland: 1994, ‘Intertheoretic Reduction: A Neuroscientist's Field Guide', in R. Warner and T. Szubka (eds.), The Mind-Body Problem: A Guide to the Current Debate, Basil Blackwell, Cambridge, Massachusetts, pp. 41–54.Google Scholar
  8. Coulson, C.: 1960, ‘Present State of Molecular Structure Calculations', Reviews of Modern Physics 32, 170–177.Google Scholar
  9. Della Rocca, M.: 1996, ‘Essentialists and Essentialism', Journal of Philosophy 93, 186–202.Google Scholar
  10. Drago, R.: 1977, Physical Methods in Chemistry, W. B. Saunders, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
  11. Horgan, T. and J. Woodward: 1985, ‘Folk Psychology is Here to Stay', Philosophical Review 94, 197–226.Google Scholar
  12. Hull, D.: 1976, ‘Informal Aspects of Theory Reduction', in R. S. Cohen et al. (eds.), PSA 1974, Philosophy of Science Association, Dordrecht, pp. 653–670.Google Scholar
  13. Hughes, R. I. G.: 1993, ‘Theoretical Explanation', in P. French, T. Uehling and H. Wettstein (eds.), Midwest Studies in Philosophy of Science, Vol. XVIII: Philosophy of Science, University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame, Indiana, pp. 132–153.Google Scholar
  14. Jones, K. R. W.: 1994, ‘Exclusion of Intrinsically Classical Domains and the Problem of Quasiclassical Emergence', Physical Review A50, 1062–1070.Google Scholar
  15. Jones, R.: 1991, ‘Realism about What?', Philosophy of Science 58, 185–202.Google Scholar
  16. Löwdin, P-O.: 1988, ‘The Mathematical Definition of a Molecule and Molecular Structure', in J. Maruani (ed.), Molecules in Physics, Chemistry and Biology, Vol. II, Kluwer, Boston/Dordrecht, pp. 3–60.Google Scholar
  17. Nagel, E.: 1979, The Structure of Science, 2nd edn., Hackett, Indianapolis, Indiana.Google Scholar
  18. Nye, M. J.: 1993, From Chemical Philosophy to Theoretical Chemistry: Dynamics of Matter and Dynamics of Disciplines, 1800–1950, University of California Press, Berkeley, California.Google Scholar
  19. Patsakos, G.: 1976, ‘Classical Particles in Quantum Mechanics', American Journal of Physics 44, 158–166.Google Scholar
  20. Pauling, L.: 1988 [1970], General Chemistry, 3rd edn., (altered and corrected), Dover, New York.Google Scholar
  21. Primas, H.: 1981, Chemistry, Quantum Mechanics and Reductionism, Springer-Verlag, New York.Google Scholar
  22. Primas, H.: 1982, ‘Chemistry and Complementarity', Chimia 36, 293–300.Google Scholar
  23. Primas, H.: 1985, ‘Kann Chemie auf Physik reduziert werden?', Chemie in unserer Zeit 19, 109–119, 160–166.Google Scholar
  24. Primas, H.: 1990. ‘Mathematical and Philosophical Questions in the Theory of Open and Macroscopic Quantum Systems', in A. Miller (ed.), Sixty-Two Years of Uncertainty, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 233–257.Google Scholar
  25. Ramsey, J.: 1995, ‘Construction by Reduction', Philosophy of Science 62, 1–20.Google Scholar
  26. Ramsey, J.: (forthcoming), ‘One Philosopher's Perspective on the “Problem” of Molecular Shape', in E. S. Kryachko and J-L. Calais (eds.), Conceptual Trends in Quantum Chemistry, Vol. 3, Kluwer, Boston/Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  27. Rosenberg, A.: 1994, Instrumental Biology or the Disunity of Science, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois.Google Scholar
  28. Scerri, E.: 1994, ‘Has Quantum Chemistry Been at Least Approximately Reduced to Quantum Mechanics?', in D. Hull, M. Forbes and R. Burian (eds.), PSA 1994, Vol. 1, Philosophy of Science Association, East Lansing, Michigan.Google Scholar
  29. Scerri, E. and L. McIntyre: 1997, ‘The Case for the Philosophy of Chemistry', Synthesethis issue, 213–232.Google Scholar
  30. Sutcliffe, B.: 1992, ‘The Chemical Bond and Molecular Structure', Journal of Molecular Structure (Theochem) 259, 29–58.Google Scholar
  31. Trindle, C.: 1980, ‘The Quantum Mechanical View of Molecular Structure and the Shapes of Molecules', Israel Journal of Chemistry 19, 47–53.Google Scholar
  32. Warner, R.: 1994, ‘Introduction', in R. Warner and T. Szubka (eds.), The Mind-Body Problem: A Guide to the Current Debate, Basil Blackwell, Cambridge, Massachusetts, pp. 1–16.Google Scholar
  33. Weininger, S.: 1984, ‘The Molecular Structure Conundrum: Can Classical Chemistry be Reduced to Quantum Chemistry?', Journal of Chemical Education 61, 939–944.Google Scholar
  34. Wheeler, J.: 1973, ‘From Relativity to Mutability', in J. Mehra (ed.), The Physicist's Conception of Nature, D. Reidel, Boston, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  35. Wimsatt, W.: 1995, ‘The Ontology of Complex Systems: Levels of Organization, Perspective, and Causal Thickets', in M. Matthen and R. X. Ware (eds.), Biology and Society, (Canadian Journal of Philosophy, supplementary volume 20), pp. 207–274.Google Scholar
  36. Woolley, R.: 1976, ‘Quantum Theory and Molecular Structure', Advances in Physics 25, 27–52.Google Scholar
  37. Woolley, R.: 1978, ‘Must a Molecule Have a Shape?', Journal of the American Chemical Society 100, 1073–1078.Google Scholar
  38. Woolley, R.: 1980, ‘Quantum Mechanical Aspects of the Molecular Structure Hypothesis', Israel Journal of Chemistry 19, 30–46.Google Scholar
  39. Woolley, R.: 1982, ‘Natural Optical Activity and the Molecular Hypothesis', Structure and Bonding 52, 1–35.Google Scholar
  40. Woolley, R.: 1985, ‘The Molecular Structure Conundrum', Journal of Chemical Education 62, 1082–1084.Google Scholar
  41. Woolley, R.: 1986, ‘Molecular Shapes and Molecular Structures', Chemical Physics Letters 125, 200–205.Google Scholar
  42. Woolley, R.: 1988, ‘Must a Molecule Have a Shape?', New Scientist 120, 53–58.Google Scholar
  43. Woolley, R.: 1991, ‘Quantum Chemistry Beyond the Born–Oppenheimer Approximation', Journal of Molecular Structure (Theochem) 230, 17–46.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jeffry L. Ramsey
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyOregon State UniversityCorvallisU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations