Abstract
In his preface the Le Berger extravagant (1627–1628), published in 1633 as L'Anti-Roman, Charles Sorel explains that he is working for the public good by composing a text that mocks all others and that is, as a result, the "tombeau des romans, & des absurditez de la Poësie." Sorel's statement of the "otherness" of his text is complicated the fact that the Anti-Roman is more or less a studied duplication of the very texts it criticizes. In this article, I examine the role of pleasure in the ambivalent dynamic between roman and anti-roman. Using Barthes's notions of pleasure and jouissance as a framework for the study, I consider the implications of Sorel's attempts to seduce the reader into his text by imitating the conventional novel's perceived use of pleasure as a mask for vice. The double-layered nature of the narration poses particular challenges for interpretation because meaning becomes suspended in the murky space between "same" and "other," between novel and anti-novel. Furthermore, the semantic ambiguities of this game of seduction confounds body and text to such a degree that the author's own identity becomes lost itself in the imitative disguises he adopts. He becomes, like his text, multilayered, polysemous, uncertain.
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tucker, H. Pleasure, Seduction, and Authorial Identity in Charles Sorel's Le Berger extravagant. Neophilologus 84, 347–358 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004783422291
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004783422291