Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Resolving the hidden differences among perspectives on sustainable development

  • Published:
Policy Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Ascher, W. (1992). Coping with Disappointing Rates of Return of Development Projects That A¡ect the Environment, Policy Research Working Paper WPS 965. Washington, D.C.: World Bank, August.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ascher, W. (1993). ‘The ambiguous nature of forecasts in project evaluation,’ International Journal of Forecasting 9 (1): 109–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barney, G.O. 1980. The Global 2000 Report to the President - Entering the Twenty-First Century: A Report. Council on Environmental Quality and the Department of State: Gerald O. Barney, study director. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, R.C. and M. P. Welsh (1992). ‘Existence values in bene¢t-cost analysis and damage assessment,’ Land Economics 68 (4): 405–417.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyce, M. S. and A. Haney (1997). ‘Introduction,’ in M. Boyce and A. Haney, eds., Ecosystem Management. New Haven: Yale University Press, pp. 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, G. (1998). ‘Policy Sciences and ecological sciences: Convergent evolution?’ Ann Arbor, Michigan: Erb Environmental Management Institute, University of Michigan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunner, R.D. (1982). ‘Decentralized energy policies,’ in R.D. Brunner and R. Sandenburgh, eds., Community Energy Options: Getting Started in Ann Arbor. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunner, R.D. (1991). ‘Global climate change: De¢ning the policy problem,’ Policy Sciences 24 (3): 291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunner, R.D. (1997a). ‘Introduction to the Policy Sciences,’ Policy Sciences 30 (4): 191–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunner, R.D. (1997b). ‘Raising standards: A prototyping strategy for undergraduate education,’ Policy Sciences 30 (3): 167–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunner, R.D. and G.D. Brewer (1971). Organized Complexity: Empirical Theories of Political Development. NewYork: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunner, R.D. and T.W. Clark (1997). ‘A practice-based approach to ecosystem management,’ Conservation Biology 11 (1): 48–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, T.W. (1997). Averting Extinction: Reconstructing Endangered Species Recovery. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1995). HowMany People Can the Earth Support? NewYork: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Common, M., I. Reid and R. Blamey (1997). ‘Do existence values for cost bene¢t analysis exist?’ Environmental and Resource Economics 9: 225–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeLong, D. (1996). ‘Defining biodiversity,’ Wildlife Society Bulletin 24 (4): 738–749.

    Google Scholar 

  • Egler, F. (1977). The Nature of Vegetation, ItsManagement andMismanagement: An Introduction to Vegetation Science. Norfolk, CT: Aton Forest.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grumbine, R. E. (1994). ‘What is ecosystem management?’ Conservation Biology 8: 27–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Healy, R. and W. Ascher (1995). ‘Knowledge in the policy process,’ Policy Sciences 28 (1): 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kauffman, S. (1995). At Home in the Universe: The Search for Laws of Self-Organization and Complexity. NewYork: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasswell, H.D. (1965) [1935]. World Politics and Personal Insecurity. NewYork: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasswell, H.D. (1971). Pre-View of Policy Sciences. NewYork: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasswell, H.D. and M. McDougal (1992). Jurisprudence for a Free Society. New Haven: New Haven Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lautenschlager, R.E. (1997). ‘Biodiversity is Dead,’ Wildlife Society Bulletin 25 (3): 679–685.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markandya, A. and D. Pearce (1988).‘Natural environments and the social rate of discount.’ Project Appraisal 3 (1): 2–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meadows, D., D. Meadows, J. Randers and W. Behrens (1972). The Limits to Growth. Washington, D.C.: Potomac Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munda, G. (1996). ‘Cost-benefit analysis in integrated environmental assessment: Some methodological issues,’ Ecological Economics 19: 157–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norgaard, R. (1984). ‘Coevolutionary development potential,’ Land Economics 60 (2): 160–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pielke, R. (1995). ‘Usable information for policy: An appraisal of the U.S. global change research program,’ Policy Sciences 28 (1): 39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Primm, S. A., and T.W. Clark (1996). ‘Making sense of the policy process for carnivore conservation,’ Conservation Biology 10 (4): 48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanderson, S. and K. Redford (1997). ‘Biodiversity politics and the contest for ownership of the world's biota,’ in R. Kramer, C. van Schaik and J. Johnson, eds., Last Stand: Protected Areas & the Defense of Tropical Diversity. NewYork: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. (1985). ‘Human nature in politics: the dialogue of psychology with political science,’ American Political Science Review 79: 293–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanley, T.R., Jr. (1995). ‘Ecosystem management and the arrogance of humanism,’ Conservation Biology 9: 255–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, J.W., C. Maser and J. E. Rodiek (1979). ‘Edges,’ in J.W. Thomas, ed., Wildlife Habitats in Managed Forests: The Blue Mountains of Oregon and Washington. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Agriculture Forestry Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weaver, W. (1948). ‘Science and complexity,’ American Scientist 36: 539.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ascher, W. Resolving the hidden differences among perspectives on sustainable development. Policy Sciences 32, 351–377 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004780018434

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004780018434

Keywords

Navigation