Skip to main content
Log in

Building on Bedrock: William Steel Creighton and the Reformation of Ant Systematics, 1925–1970

  • Published:
Journal of the History of Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Ideas about the natural world are intertwined with the personalities, practices, and the workplaces of scientists. The relationships between these categories are explored in the life of the taxonomist William Steel Creighton. Creighton studied taxonomy under William Morton Wheeler at Harvard University. He took the rules he learned from Wheeler out of the museum and into the field. In testing the rules against a new situation, Creighton found them wanting. He sought a new set of taxonomic principles, one he eventually found in Ernst Mayr's Systematics and the Origin of Species. Mayr's ideas tied together a number of themes running through Creighton's life: the need for a revised taxonomy, the emphasis on fieldwork, and the search for a new power center for ant taxonomy after Wheeler died. Creighton's adoption of Mayr's ideas as part of his professional identity also had very real implications for his career path: field studies required long and intensive studies, and Creighton would always be a slow worker. His method of taxonomy contrasted sharply not only with Wheeler's but also with two of his younger colleagues, William L. Brown and E. O. Wilson, who took over Wheeler's spot at Harvard in 1950. The disputes between these men over ant taxonomy involved, in addition to questions of technical interest, questions about where and how best to do taxonomy and who could speak withthe most authority. Creighton's story reveals how these questions are interrelated. The story also reveals the importance of Mayr's book for changes occurring in taxonomy in the middle of the twentieth century.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ball, C. R. 1946. “Why is Taxonomy Ill-supported?” Science 103: 713-714.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrow, M. V. 1998. A Passion for Birds. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bates, M. 1935. “The Butterflies of Cuba.” Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology 78: 63-258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, H. S. 1963. Outsiders. London: Free Press of Glenco Collier Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, H. S. and Carper, J. W. 1956. “The Development of Identification with an Occupation.” American Journal of Sociology 61: 289-298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biagioli, M. 1993. Galileo, Courtier. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blatchley, W. S. 1928. “'Quit-claim' Specialists vs. the Making of Manuals.” Bulletin of the Brooklyn Entomological Society 23: 10-19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, W. L. 1950. “Morphological, Taxonomic, and Other Notes on Ants.” The Wasmann Journal of Biology 8: 241-250.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1951. “The Ants of North America (Review).” Psyche 57: 31-32.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1955. “Ant Taxonomy.” In: A Century of Progress in The Natural Sciences, pp. 569-572. San Francisco: California Academy of Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1963. “The Ants of Colorado (Review).” Quarterly Review of Biology 38: 269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — 1964. “The Ants of North Dakota (Review).” Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society 37: 87-88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, W. L. and Wilson, E. O. 1954. “The Case Against the Trinomen.” Systematic Zoology 3: 174-176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buren, W. F. 1943. A Monograph of Iowa Ants (Formicidae, Hymenoptera). M.S. Thesis, Iowa State College.

  • — 1968. “Some Fundamental Taxonomic Problems in Formica (Hymenoptera: Formicidae).” Journal of the Georgia Entomological Society 3: 25-40.

  • Chapman, F. M. 1921. “The Department of Birds.” Natural History 21: 307-318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cockerell, T. D. A. 1930. “Variation in Lepidoptera.” Bulletin of the Brooklyn Entomological Society 25: 9-10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, A. C. 1938. “Suggestions Concerning Taxonomic Nomenclature of the Hymenopterous Family Formicidae.” American Midland Naturalist 19: 236-241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — 1956. “In Defense of the Integrity of an Ant.” Journal of the Tennessee Academy of Science 31: 212-214.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1966. “Ants of the Nevada Test Site.” Brigham Young University Science Bulletin. Biological Series Volume 7, Number 3: 1-27.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1968. Pogonomyrmex Harvester Ants. Nashville: University of Tennessee Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creighton, W. S. 1930. “The New World Species of the Genus Solenopsis (Hymenoptera: Formicidae).” Proceedings of the American Academy of Arts and Science 66: 39-151.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1938. “On Formicid Nomenclature.” Journal of the New York Entomological Society 46: 1-9.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1940. “A Revision of the North American Variants of the Ant Formica Rufa.” American Museum Novitiates 1055: 1-10.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1950. “The Ants of North America.” Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology 104: 1-585.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1951. “Studies on Arizona Ants.” Psyche 58: 89-99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darlington, P. J. 1934. “The Subspecies of Chlaenius leucoseelis Chev. (Coleop., Carabidae) with a Note on a Function of Museums.” The Pan-Pacific Entomologist 10: 115-118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donisthorpe, H. 1915. British Ants, Their Life-History and Classification. Plymouth: W. Brendon and Son, Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durrant, S. 1955. “In Defense of the Subspecies.” Systematic Zoology 4: 186-190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, J. G. 1954. “A New Approach to Infrapsecific Categories.” Systematic Zoology 3: 1-20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emerson, A. E. 1945. “Taxonomic Categories and Population Genetics.” Entomological News 56: 14-19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emery, C. 1910. Hymenoptera Family Formicidae Subfamily Dorylinae. Genera Insectorum fascicle 102: 1-34.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1911. Hymenoptera Family Formicidae Subfamily Ponerinae. Genera Insectorum fascicle 118: 1-125.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1912. Hymenoptera Family Formicidae Subfamily Dolichoderinae. Genera Insectorum fascicle 137: 1-50.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1921-1922. Hymenoptera Family Formicidae Subfamily Myrmicinae. Genera Insectorum fascicles 174a, b, and c: 1-397.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1925. Hymenoptera Family Formicidae Subfamily Formicinae. Genera Insectorum fascicle 183: 1-302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, M. A. and Evans, H. E. 1970. William Morton Wheeler, Biologist. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fennah, R. G. 1955. “Subspecific Nomenclature: The Proposed Method of Wilson and Brown.” Systematic Zoology 4: 140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferris, G. F. 1942. “The Needs of Systematic Entomology.” Journal of Economic Entomology 35: 732-738.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaul, A. T. 1946. “How to Become an Entomologist.” Bulletin of the Brooklyn Entomological Society 41: 83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, S. J. 1989. Wonderful Life. New York: W.W. Norton and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregg, R. E. 1953. “Morphological Considerations Affecting the Taxonomy of Certain Genera of Ants.” Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Washington 55: 324-330.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1963. The Ants of Colorado. Boulder: University of Colorado Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1974. “William Steel Creighton-An Appreciation.” Journal of the New York Entomological Society 82: 67-75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greil, A. L. and Rudy, D. R. 1984. “What Have We Learned from Process Models of Conversion? An Examination of Ten Case Studies.” Sociological Focus 17: 305-321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardee, Betty and Tomita, Kazuo. 1973. A Survey of Scientific and Professional Characteristics of the General Membership of the Entomological Society of America. JHU-CRSC Report #25. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henson, P. M. 1990. Evolution and Taxonomy: John Henry Comstock's Research School in Evolutionary Entomology at Cornell University 1874-1930. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Maryland.

  • — 1993. “The Comstock Research School in Evolutionary Entomology.” Osiris, n.s., 8: 159-177.

  • Horn, W. 1928. “The Future of Insect Taxonomy.” Transactions of the Fourth International Congress of Entomology. Naumburg: G. Gpätz, pp. 34-51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoyt, Erich. 1996. The Earth Dwellers. New York: Touchstone.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, Tim (ed.). 1988. The Collected Poetry of Robinson Jeffers, Volume 1. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacot, A. P. 1930. “Nomenclature and Me.” Science 72: 272-273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, C. H. 1928. “The Theory of Nomenclature.” Transactions of the Fourth International Congress of Entomology. Naumburg: G. Spätz, pp. 665-672.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinsey, A. C. 1929. “The Gall Wasps of the Genus Cynips: A Study in the Origin of Species.” Indiana University Studies 26: 5-577.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1936. The Origin of Higher Categories in Cynips. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1937. “An Evolutionary Analysis of Insular and Continental Species.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 23: 5-11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knight, H. H. 1929. “Rectifications for Blatchley's 'Heteroptera' With the Description of a New Species (Hemiptera).” Bulletin of the Brooklyn Entomological Society 24: 143-154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohler, R. E. 1994. Lords of the Fly. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krombein, K. V., Hurd, P. D. and Smith, D. R. 1979. Catalog of Hymenoptera in America North of Mexico. Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuklick, H. and Kohler, R. E. 1996. Introduction. Osiris, n.s., 11: 1-14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. 1983. “Give Me a Laboratory and I Will Raise the World.” In: Science Observed, ed. Karin Knorr-Cetina and Michael Mulkay, pp. 141-170. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1987. Science in Action. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linsley, E. G. 1944. “The Naming of Infraspecific Categories.” Entomological News 55: 225-232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, J. E. 1990. “Firefly Semiosystematics and Predation: A History.” Florida Entomologist 73: 51-66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maeterlinck, M. 1930. The Life of the Ant. New York: John Day Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, E. 1942. Systematics and the Origin of Species. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, E. and Ashlock, P. D. 1991. Principles of Systematic Zoology. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nash, R. 1982. Wilderness and the American Mind. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, G. H. 1938. “William Morton Wheeler 1865-1937.” Biographical Memoirs of the Members of the National Academy of Sciences 19: 203-241.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1946. The World Expands: Recollections of a Zoologist. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1964. “The New Harvard Biological Lab.” Science 76: 158-162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearl, Raymond. 1922. “Trends of Modern Biology.” Science 56: 581-592.

    Google Scholar 

  • Regnier, F. E. and Wilson, E. O. 1971. “Chemical Communication and 'Propaganda' in Slave-making Ants.” Science 172: 267-269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudwick, Martin. 1996. “Geological Travel and Theoretical Innovation: The Role of “Limnal” Experience.” Social Studies of Science 26: 143-159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sax, Karl. 1966. “The Bussey Institution: Harvard University Graduate School of Applied Biology.” Journal of Heredity 57: 175-178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Secord, A. 1994. “Science in the Pub: Artisan Botanists in Early Nineteenth-century Lancashire.” History of Science 232: 269-315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapin, S. 1988. “The House of Experiment in Seventeenth-century England.” Isis 79: 373-404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — 1994. A Social History of Truth. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapin, S. and Schaffer, S. 1985. Leviathan and the Air-Pump. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, G. G. 1961. Principles of Animal Taxonomy. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spieth, H. T. 1978. From Farm Boy to Evolutionist. Oral History with Marvin Brienes. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stresemann, E. 1975. Ornithology. Trans. Hans J. and Cathleen Epstein. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilden, J. W. 1961. “Certain Comments on the Subspecies Problem.” Systematic Zoology 10: 17-23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Traweek, Sharon. 1988. Beamtimes and Lifetimes. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, F. J. 1920. The Frontier in American History. New York: H. Holt and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vernon, K. 1993. “Desperately Seeking Status: Evolutionary Systematics and the Taxonomists' Search for Respectability 1940-1960.” British Journal for the History of Science 26: 207-227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler, G. C. and Wheeler, J. 1963. The Ants of North Dakota. Grand Forks: University of North Dakota.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler, W. M. 1910. Ants. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1913. “The Ants of the Genus Formica.” Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology 53: 379-565.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1917. “The Mountain Ants of Western North America.” Proceedings of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences 52: 457-569.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1923. Social Life Among the Insects. New York: Harcourt, Brace, and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1930. “The Bussey Institution.” In: The Development of Harvard University, 1869-1929, ed. Samuel Eliot Morison, pp. 508-517. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, E. O. 1955. “A Monographic Revision of the Ant Genus Lasius.” Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology 113: 1-199.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1991. “Philip Jackson Darlington, Jr.” Biographical Memoirs of the Members of the National Academy of Sciences 60: 33-44.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1994. Naturalist. Washington, D.C.: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, E. O. and Brown, W. L. 1953. “The Subspecies Concept and its Taxonomic Application.” Systematic Zoology 2: 97-111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — 1955. “Revisionary Notes on the Sanguinea and Neogagates Groups of the Ant Genus Formica.” Psyche 62: 108-128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, E. O. and Regnier, F. E. 1971. “The Evolution of the Alarm-defense System in the Formicine Ants.” The American Naturalist 105: 279-289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winner, L. 1980. “Do Artifacts Have Politics?” Daedalus 109: 121-136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winsor, M. P. 1976. Starfish, Jellyfish, and the Order of Life. New York: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1991. Reading the Shape of Nature. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zabusky, S. E. 1995. Launching Europe. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerman, Michael. 1977. “Pilgrims in the Wilderness: Community, Modernity, and the Maypole at Merry Mount.” The New England Quarterly 50: 255-275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Buhs, J. Building on Bedrock: William Steel Creighton and the Reformation of Ant Systematics, 1925–1970. Journal of the History of Biology 33, 27–70 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004712911037

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004712911037

Navigation