Skip to main content
Log in

Issues in the Design and Analysis of Panel Studies: A Cursory Review

  • Published:
Quality and Quantity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper offers a broad review of some aspects in the design and analysis of panel studies, chiefly of household panel surveys. Both the analytic benefits and the potential problems of panel surveys are briefly outlined, and selected methodological and operational issues, which crucially affect data quality are highlighted. These questions are then considered under four headings: (i) dynamic population and its implications for initial sampling and following rules; (ii) panel length and number of waves; (iii) tracking and tracing techniques, and other strategies for maintaining high participation rates; (iv) questionnaire design and strategies for collecting retrospective information. While no technical details are offered, there is some discussion of the possible drawbacks and advantages of the different approaches described.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ashenfelter, O. & Solon, G. (1982). Longitudinal labor market data. Sources, uses and limitations. In: Proceedings of the Conference on labor force measurements for policy formulation. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, pp. 109–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernard, H. R. et al. (1984). The problem of informant accuracy: the validity of retrospective data. Annual Review of Anthropology 13: 495–517.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biemer, P. P. et al. (eds.) (1991). Measurement Errors in Surveys. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Courgeau, D. & Lelièvre, E. (1988). Analyse démographique des biographies. Paris: INED. ie]]Deutsches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung (ed.) (1990). Das Sozio-oekonomische panel (GSOEP). Version 4, Berlin [translation: All-University Gerontology Center, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY, 1991].

    Google Scholar 

  • Dippo, C. S. (1989). The use of cognitive laboratory techniques for investigating memory retrieval errors in retrospective surveys, Bulletin of the International Statistical Institute vol. LIII, book 2: 363–382.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, G. J. (1992). Household panel studies: prospects and problems, Working Papers of the European Scientific Network on Household Panel Studies, Paper No. 54, Colchester: University of Essex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, G. J. & Kalton, G. (1987). Issues of design and analysis of surveys across time, International Statistical Review 55: 97–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, G. J. et al. (1993). Poverty dynamics in eight countries. Journal of Population Economics 6: 215–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, G. J., Juster, F. T. & Morgan, J. N. (1987). The role of panel studies in research on economic behavior. Transportation Research 21A: 249–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghellini, G. & Trivellato, U. (1996). Indagini panel sul comportamento socio-economico di individui e famiglie: una selezionata rassegna di problemi ed esperienze. In: C. Quintano (a cura di), Scritti di Statistica Economica 2. Napoli: Rocco Curto Editore, pp. 271–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heckman, J. J. (1979). Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica 46: 931–961.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsiao, C. (1985). Benefits and limitations of panel data [with discussion]. Econometric Reviews 4: 121–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsiao, C. (1986). Analysis of Panel Data. Cambridge, MA, U.S.A.: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalton, G. (1986). Handling wave nonresponse in panel surveys. Journal of Official Statistics 2: 303–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalton, G. (1993). Panel surveys: adding the forth dimension. In: Proceedings of Statistics Canada Symposium 92.Design and Analysis of Longitudinal Surveys. Ottawa: Statistics Canada, pp. 7–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kasprzyk, D. et al. (eds.) (1989). Panel Surveys. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martini, A. (1989). Seam effect, recall bias, and the estimation of labour force transition rates from SIPP. In: Proceedings of the Section of Survey Research Methods, American Statistical Association, pp. 387–392.

  • Mátyás, L. & Sevestre, P. (eds) (1996). The Econometrics of Panel Data. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Muircheartaigh, C. (1996). Measurement errors in panel surveys: implications for survey design and for survey instruments. In: Società Italiana di Statistica, Atti della XXXVIII Riunione Scientifica. Rimini: Maggioli Editore, Vol. 1, pp. 219–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, D. (1993). European household panel studies, Working Papers of the European Scientific Network on Household Panel Studies, Paper No. 45, Colchester: University of Essex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solon, G. (1989). The value of panel data in economic research. In: D. Kasprzyk et al. (eds), Panel Surveys. New York: Wiley, pp. 486–496.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torelli, N. & Trivellato, U. (1993). Modelling inaccuracies in job-search duration data. Journal of Econometrics 59: 187–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trivellato, U., Marliani, G. & Torelli, N. (1989). Longitudinal analysis of unemployment duration from a household survey with rotating sample: a case study with Italian labor force data. In: Bureau of the Census, Proceedings Fifth Annual Research Conference. March 19–22, 1989.Washington, D.C.: U.S. Dept. of Commerce, Bureau of the Census, pp. 408–427

    Google Scholar 

  • Trivellato, U. & Torelli, N. (1989). Analysis of labour force dynamics from rotating panel survey data. In: Bulletin of the International Statistical Institute. Proceedings of the 47th Session, Vol. LIII, Book 2, pp. 425–444.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Trivellato, U. Issues in the Design and Analysis of Panel Studies: A Cursory Review. Quality & Quantity 33, 339–351 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004657006031

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004657006031

Navigation