Abstract
This paper offers a broad review of some aspects in the design and analysis of panel studies, chiefly of household panel surveys. Both the analytic benefits and the potential problems of panel surveys are briefly outlined, and selected methodological and operational issues, which crucially affect data quality are highlighted. These questions are then considered under four headings: (i) dynamic population and its implications for initial sampling and following rules; (ii) panel length and number of waves; (iii) tracking and tracing techniques, and other strategies for maintaining high participation rates; (iv) questionnaire design and strategies for collecting retrospective information. While no technical details are offered, there is some discussion of the possible drawbacks and advantages of the different approaches described.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ashenfelter, O. & Solon, G. (1982). Longitudinal labor market data. Sources, uses and limitations. In: Proceedings of the Conference on labor force measurements for policy formulation. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, pp. 109–126.
Bernard, H. R. et al. (1984). The problem of informant accuracy: the validity of retrospective data. Annual Review of Anthropology 13: 495–517.
Biemer, P. P. et al. (eds.) (1991). Measurement Errors in Surveys. New York: Wiley.
Courgeau, D. & Lelièvre, E. (1988). Analyse démographique des biographies. Paris: INED. ie]]Deutsches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung (ed.) (1990). Das Sozio-oekonomische panel (GSOEP). Version 4, Berlin [translation: All-University Gerontology Center, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY, 1991].
Dippo, C. S. (1989). The use of cognitive laboratory techniques for investigating memory retrieval errors in retrospective surveys, Bulletin of the International Statistical Institute vol. LIII, book 2: 363–382.
Duncan, G. J. (1992). Household panel studies: prospects and problems, Working Papers of the European Scientific Network on Household Panel Studies, Paper No. 54, Colchester: University of Essex.
Duncan, G. J. & Kalton, G. (1987). Issues of design and analysis of surveys across time, International Statistical Review 55: 97–117.
Duncan, G. J. et al. (1993). Poverty dynamics in eight countries. Journal of Population Economics 6: 215–234.
Duncan, G. J., Juster, F. T. & Morgan, J. N. (1987). The role of panel studies in research on economic behavior. Transportation Research 21A: 249–263.
Ghellini, G. & Trivellato, U. (1996). Indagini panel sul comportamento socio-economico di individui e famiglie: una selezionata rassegna di problemi ed esperienze. In: C. Quintano (a cura di), Scritti di Statistica Economica 2. Napoli: Rocco Curto Editore, pp. 271–314.
Heckman, J. J. (1979). Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica 46: 931–961.
Hsiao, C. (1985). Benefits and limitations of panel data [with discussion]. Econometric Reviews 4: 121–188.
Hsiao, C. (1986). Analysis of Panel Data. Cambridge, MA, U.S.A.: Cambridge University Press.
Kalton, G. (1986). Handling wave nonresponse in panel surveys. Journal of Official Statistics 2: 303–314.
Kalton, G. (1993). Panel surveys: adding the forth dimension. In: Proceedings of Statistics Canada Symposium 92.Design and Analysis of Longitudinal Surveys. Ottawa: Statistics Canada, pp. 7–20.
Kasprzyk, D. et al. (eds.) (1989). Panel Surveys. New York: Wiley.
Martini, A. (1989). Seam effect, recall bias, and the estimation of labour force transition rates from SIPP. In: Proceedings of the Section of Survey Research Methods, American Statistical Association, pp. 387–392.
Mátyás, L. & Sevestre, P. (eds) (1996). The Econometrics of Panel Data. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands.
O'Muircheartaigh, C. (1996). Measurement errors in panel surveys: implications for survey design and for survey instruments. In: Società Italiana di Statistica, Atti della XXXVIII Riunione Scientifica. Rimini: Maggioli Editore, Vol. 1, pp. 219–230.
Rose, D. (1993). European household panel studies, Working Papers of the European Scientific Network on Household Panel Studies, Paper No. 45, Colchester: University of Essex.
Solon, G. (1989). The value of panel data in economic research. In: D. Kasprzyk et al. (eds), Panel Surveys. New York: Wiley, pp. 486–496.
Torelli, N. & Trivellato, U. (1993). Modelling inaccuracies in job-search duration data. Journal of Econometrics 59: 187–211.
Trivellato, U., Marliani, G. & Torelli, N. (1989). Longitudinal analysis of unemployment duration from a household survey with rotating sample: a case study with Italian labor force data. In: Bureau of the Census, Proceedings Fifth Annual Research Conference. March 19–22, 1989.Washington, D.C.: U.S. Dept. of Commerce, Bureau of the Census, pp. 408–427
Trivellato, U. & Torelli, N. (1989). Analysis of labour force dynamics from rotating panel survey data. In: Bulletin of the International Statistical Institute. Proceedings of the 47th Session, Vol. LIII, Book 2, pp. 425–444.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Trivellato, U. Issues in the Design and Analysis of Panel Studies: A Cursory Review. Quality & Quantity 33, 339–351 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004657006031
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004657006031